//
you're reading...
9-11, Made In Israel, Terrorism, Uncategorized

9-11: Made In Israel

This book proves beyond reasonable doubt that Israel and the Mossad carried out the terrorism WTC on 9-11. It shows how the “9-11 Truther” movement was created/infiltrated by these same Zionists and that it is NO
SECRET. The American people are the only ones who don’t know. Read this, and pass it on: – MacGalactus

patriots911
Click the link to read in PDF format: 9-11: Made In Israel PDF
Comments on Victor Thorn’s Previous Works
In 9-11 on Trial, Victor Thorn has organized an enormous amount of important information, most of which was previously difficult to find, into a very readable book—one that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the official story about the collapse of the
WTC is a lie. I wish I had had it when I was writing my own books on the subject. Thorn’s very readable book makes a lot of information available that over 99 percent of us would not otherwise be able to find.
— David Ray Griffin
The New Pearl Harbor
The whole truth of the real story, Thorn’s 9-11 Evil is the first major book to implicate
Israel in 9-11.
— John Kaminski
The Day America Died
Noted author Victor Thorn essentially puts the Bush theory of what happened to these buildings on trial, with simulated witnesses and questioning. And when weighed in the
balance, the Bush theory is found to be wanting.
— John Tiffany
The Barnes Review
After the publication of 9-11 on Trial, it is no longer possible to suppress the basic evidence for controlled demolition.
— D. Alexander Floum
Attorney & law professor
9-11 On Trial should be read and shared with everyone who claims to be an American, or for that matter, everyone, American or not, who believes in a system of law and free and open governance.
— Gary Long
Constitutional activist
Consider Victor Thorn’s The New World Order Exposed your final wake-up call.
— Jim Marrs
Inside Job
Thorn is a shining star in the freedom movement, and his efforts are inestimable.
— Michael Collins Piper
Final Judgment
Thorn’s stated goal is to wake up the reader to what is really happening in the world, and he does so dramatically. Wake them up and give them nightmares for years to come.
— Thomas Fortenberry
Midwest Book Review
I have had very personal and direct experience in some of the vast array of illicit, immoral and deadly acts that Victor Thorn presents in a clear and convincing manner. He gets five stars from me.
— Lt. Col. Daniel Marvin
Expendable Elite
Thorn’s 9-11 Evil is one of those ways of beginning the process of flushing this evil cancer out of the body of mankind that will destroy everything if it is not stopped.
— Mark Glenn
Ship Without a Country
Victor Thorn pulls no punches in this blockbuster must read. But
then again Victor has never been known to pull any punches.
— Vincent Sammartino
9-11 Passenger List Oddity

Made in Israel:
9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America
Victor Thorn
Sisyphus Press
P.O. Box 10495
State College, Pa. 16805-0495
ISBN: 978-1-61364-279-5
Copyright 2011 by Victor Thorn
All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction,
in whole or in part in any form
Front and back cover design: Peter Currenti
Manufactured in the United States of America
First edition: July, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Made in Israel
1) “9-11 Was an Inside/Outside Job” 1
2) New York City Insiders 5
3) Larry Silverstein and WTC 7 7
4) Security 11
5) The Dancing Israelis and Urban Moving Systems 15
6) Mastermind? 19
7) Israel and the Mossad 21
8) Booker Elementary School 25
9) The 9-11 Commission Cover-up 28
10) Israeli Spy Rings 31
11) Muslim ‘Patsies’ 34
12) Neo-cons 40
13) The Final Taboo 50
American Free Press Articles (2008-2011)
14) Proof: Associated Press Foreknowledge—Reads
from 9-11 Script 51
15) Censored! Israel’s Role in 9-11 Attacks 52
16) Pentagon Anomalies Contradict Official Timeline 53
17) Did ‘Doomsday Plane’ Direct 9-11 Attacks? 55
18) Defense Industry Insider Supports Flight 93 Missile Theory 57
19) Microbiologist Mass Murder List Grows 59
20) Opium Production Continues to Set Records in Afghanistan 61
21) Biden Blasted for ‘Bunker Blunder’ 64
22) Jesse Ventura Reveals Black Box Mystery on TV Show 67
23) New Website Questions Israel’s 9-11 Role 68
24) New Pictures from 9-11 Raise More Questions 70
25) Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive? 72
26) Whistleblower Reveals 9-11 Remote Control
Override System 76
27) Were Nukes Used on 9-11? 78
28) Initial Flight 93 News Broadcasts 79
29) Did the Magic of Television Fool Americans on 9-11? 81
30) Interview with CNN Reporter Who Was First on Scene
at Pentagon on 9-11 85
31) Firemen Audiotapes Cast More Doubt on ‘Official’
9-11 Story 87
32) Charlie Sheen Gives 9-11 Truthers a Bad Name 88

“9-11 WAS AN INSIDE/OUTSIDE JOB”
“The most dangerous 9-11 book ever written.”
These emboldened words adorned the cover of 9-11 Evil when it appeared in
2006.
What made this fifth anniversary edition so threatening was contained in one
simple premise: this was the first book ever published that accused the terrorist
nation of Israel of playing a pivotal role in the attacks against America that
occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.
A false-flag operation of this magnitude naturally required that the psychopaths
responsible for it needed to cover every base, especially since their tactical
execution proved so sloppy. Although the vast majority of U.S. citizens were
traumatized into accepting the official version of events (i.e. 19 radical Muslims
under the tutelage of mastermind Osama bin Laden committed the attacks), a
contingent of skeptics would undoubtedly emerge that questioned many of the
glaring inconsistencies.
To combat authentic investigators and researchers, the actual Sept. 11 massmurderers
had already devised a method of dispelling any genuine inquiries into
Israel’s criminal activities. In essence, the ‘9-11 truth movement’ was created
prior to Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli
complicity.
By 2002-2003, ‘truthers’ began appearing at rallies holding placards that read
“9-11 was an inside job.” Initially, these signs provided hope for those who didn’t
believe the government and mainstream media’s absurd cover stories.
But then an awful realization emerged: the slogan “9-11 was an inside job”
was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised.
The reason is obvious. Israeli killers and their neo-con allies used an already
established ‘truther movement’ to reinforce the notion that only elements within
the U.S. government had engineered and executed the 9-11 terror attacks. Of
course individuals such as vice president Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and
Gen. Richard Myers had blood on their hands. But similar to Lee Harvey
Oswald’s characterization as a ‘lone nut assassin,’ these co-opted ‘truthers’
refused to publicize any information that led to knowledge of Israeli involvement
in 9-11.
As such, an appalling sickness infiltrated and took over the 9-11 truth
movement. These purported activists were more than willing to blame elements
within their own government for the 9-11 crimes, but they adamantly denied any
hint of Israel’s central role.
It goes without saying that the PNAC-neo-con crowd is monstrous, but the
‘truthers’ epitomize a treasonous example of betrayal against their own nation by
denying the involvement of a foreign government, namely Israel.
As a result, the compromised (fake) 9-11 truth movement acted as little more
than useful idiots—mind-numbed puppets who were protecting the maniacal band
of killers behind 9-11.
Therefore, a gauge became necessary. Would ‘truth-seekers’ specifically
identify Israel’s murderous deeds, or would they continue to partake in the coverup?
If they opted to not point a finger of blame at Israel, a vital question must then
be asked—why would they intentionally protect the most vile, destructive, antihuman
elements that reside on the planet Earth?
The mantra, “9-11 was an inside job” is only partially true and is inherently
damaging to the ‘truth movement’ because it shifts all attention away from Israel’s
traitorous assault against America. If somebody’s relatives and neighbors
conspired to burn down a family member’s house, what kind of spineless
individual would only focus on their own siblings, yet fail to assign any blame to
those who lived next door? Both parties deserve damnation, yet ‘truthers’
continually give Israel a free pass.
How can the truth about Israel’s savagery hurt a ‘truth movement’? It’s like
letting someone rape your mother and deliberately not bringing charges against
them. Ponder the ramifications of this cowardly approach to justice.
If a person compromises their Self by settling for lies and omissions in regard
to Israeli crimes and corruption, then they might as well surrender the crux of their
entire being because they’ll forever have a Sword of Damocles hanging over their
head.
If a person claims to be a ‘truther,’ then it’s an all-or-nothing endeavor. The
Sword mentioned earlier is Israeli terrorism, Israeli domination of U.S. foreign
policy, Israeli control of Congress through organizations such as AIPAC, and
Israeli collusion with evil elements within the uppermost tier of our government.
Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know the truth about Israeli’s 9-11 barbarity.
Their willingness to perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and
vile as those who launched the attacks. There are no degrees of separation in this
matter. It’s a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth about Israel’s Murder,
Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected bed as these murdering dogs lie in.
Picture this scenario in a different context. Imagine that your house has been
burglarized, and the policemen subsequently describe the culprits as wearing
brown shoes and blue shirts. Their getaway car was a green 2006 Chevy, the
intrusion occurred near midnight via a broken window, and they stole a television
set and camera.
Once these details have been established, the homeowner asks, “Who were the
thieves?”
At that point the cops reply, “We won’t tell you who did it, even though we
know their names.”
Nobody would tolerate this type of smokescreen, yet that’s precisely what the
vast majority of fake ‘truthers’ have chosen to do. Instead of exposing the
criminals, they’ve sided with them.
This rabbit-hole extends even deeper. In 9-11 Evil, I focused primarily on
Israel’s role in 9-11. But today, it’s clear that Sept. 11 was a Jewish plot against
America and humanity as a whole.
In this light, the institutionalized 9-11 truth movement has actually been
founded and sponsored all along by the Israeli lobby, with many of its well known
members being Jewish (Nicolas Levis, Jonathan Gold, Dylan Avery, Jason
Bermas, Jonathan Elinoff, Luke Rudkowski, Daniel Abrahamson and Mike
Berger). During an Apr. 19, 2009 radio broadcast Bermas responded to a caller,
“9-11 is not a Jewish conspiracy.” He continued by saying that those who
criticized the Jews “should be hung or electrocuted.”
Another fitting portrayal of this subterfuge occurred on May 8, 2006 during an
Alex Jones radio broadcast.
Alex Jones: You and I have both been criticized—I don’t know if you’re
aware of this—uh, for not saying that Israel carried out the [9-11] attacks. Now,
now, I’m sorry, folks. Israel can’t make NORAD stand down.
9-11 Truth.org representative Mike Berger (Jewish): (hearty laughter)
Alex Jones: Israel . . . Israel . . . Israel can’t make F-16s be off doing drills that
day. Israel certainly is part of this whole global system, certainly involved in falseflag
ops in Israel and Europe. They’ve been caught; it’s been in their major papers.
I’ve reported on that, but from all the angles I’ve looked at this, it’s this multinational
crime syndicate manipulating our government that orchestrated 9-11, and
to say that Israel did it is a poison pill.
Jones then ratcheted-up his well-calculated disinformation campaign by
claiming that Israel had been made a scapegoat in this matter. “Folks, I’ve done
the research. Israel could not carry out these [9-11] attacks.”
On Jan. 27, 2008 during another broadcast, Jones reiterated his allegiance to
the Zionist criminal cabal with this smokescreen. “I’ve said many times that I do
not believe Israel carried out 9-11.”
Jones’ words are patent Jewish propaganda as he perpetuates a tactic used
time-and-again. As opposed to vehemently highlighting Israel’s role in 9-11, Jones
cloaks their guilt by using code words such as Zionists, neo-cons, Illuminati,
Satanists, globalists, New World Order, Nazis, or a ‘multi-national crime
syndicate.’
By diverting attention away from Israel, and more importantly, Judaism itself,
Jones and his ilk contribute to the cover-up. Their silence becomes outright
complicity. Further, compromised 9-11 truth groups only link to and promote
other like-minded sites that participate in their Israeli protection racket. All other
genuine truth-tellers are undeniably ignored, marginalized, attacked and mocked—
a modus operandi similarly used by cronies in the Jewish-owned mainstream
media.
The pattern is obvious. Faux conspiratologists complain about the government
and news sources not telling the truth, yet they’ve erected an utter blackout on data
regarding Israeli and 9-11. For every 9-11 researcher that divulges the truth about
Israel, 999 don’t. Their hypocrisy is glaringly obvious. The mainstream media
denies coverage to most information critical of Israel. So does the 9-11 truth
movement. They’re two peas in the same pod, controlled by the same hidden
forces.
As it stands now, the vast majority of pieces have been fit to the 9-11 Puzzle in
regard to the World Trade Center controlled demolitions, Shanksville and the
Pentagon strike. Sure, minutia arguments will always exist, but for all intents and
purposes, 9-11 has been ‘solved’ beyond any reasonable doubt.
Therefore, only one issue remains: honing in on the Jewish plot against
America that was facilitated via the 9-11 attacks. There is only one sacred cow left
to slaughter: Israeli complicity. Everything else is simply spinning around on a
hamster wheel.
In the following pages, readers will discover indisputable truths that expose
widespread Jewish involvement in 9-11. As they’ll learn, no other nation, race or
people figure as prominently as do the Jews and Israel. Countries such as Chile,
China, France or Australia cannot be substituted in place of Israel because they
weren’t the plotters. Jews, on the other hand, were involved up to their ears.
Israel’s predominance is so overwhelming that any ‘truther’ who fails to
recognize it has willingly become an accomplice in this crime.
George W. Bush was strangely correct in his assessment, “You’re either with
us, or you’re with the terrorists.” Except in this case, the actual terrorists who
committed extensive crimes against humanity are Israelis who implemented their
Jewish agenda.
9-11 was not simply an ‘inside job.’ This type of intentional conditioning and
psychic driving—conducted by Jewish mind-benders who learned their tricks of
the trade from P.R. master Edward Bernays (Jewish)—must be transcended, for
more accurately, 9-11 was an ‘inside/outside job.’
Regrettably, the fake 9-11 truth movement has always been an integral part of
the plotter’s overall plan, even before the fateful morning of Sept. 11, 2001. As the
general public was duped by the Osama bin Laden/19 Muslim hijackers cover
story, conspiracy aficionados were likewise bamboozled by a slew of
interconnected (and incestuous) 9-11 organizations whose primary purpose was to
deflect attention away from Israel’s continuing reign of terror.
You’ve been betrayed, but fortunately this book will set the record straight.
NEW YORK CITY INSIDERS
The most memorable flashpoint of the 9-11 terror attacks—one that forever
remains fixed in the minds of television viewers—was the dramatic fireball that
burst from the south tower after it was impacted by United Airlines Flight 175 (or
a facsimile thereof) at 9:03 a.m.
To make this traumatic scene possible, the WTC complex required a transfer
from New York’s Port Authority (NYPA) into privately owned hands. These
individuals could then manipulate events to facilitate the implanting of explosive
charges inside the twin towers that ultimately caused them to collapse into their
own footprints. The 2 airliners that struck them were merely a pretext that would
later be conveniently used as an excuse for their demise.
A band of Jewish businessmen choreographed the WTC complex sale into the
hands of Larry Silverstein.
Lewis Eisenberg (Jewish): As chairman of New York’s Port Authority, he
initially authorized the lease transfer from the NYPA to Silverstein. Eisenberg also
contributed significant amounts of money to the Bush-Cheney 2000 presidential
campaign, while also being a partner at the Jewish-controlled Goldman Sachs
bank. He served as a planning board member of both the United Jewish Appeal
and United Jewish Federation, in addition to being vice president of AIPAC
(American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the most powerful lobbyist group in
Washington, DC.
Frank Lowy (Jewish): He acquired a 99-year lease for 427,000 square feet of
retail space in the WTC complex. Following the 9-11 attacks, he received billions
in insurance compensation. Earlier in his life, ‘Commando’ Lowy belonged to a
Jewish terrorist organization named Hagganah, while also being a member of
Israel’s Golani Brigade. Lowy later founded the Israeli Institute for National
Strategy and Policy, and enjoyed a close relationship with Israeli politicians such
as Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert and Ariel Sharon. Lowy also
harbors strong interests in the Holocaust and Israeli politics.
Ronald Lauder (Jewish): Under New York Gov. George Pataki, Lauder acted
as the chairman and prime moving force for a commission that lobbied for
privatization of government-owned properties, especially the WTC complex. Their
efforts were eventually successful, allowing Larry Silverstein to become its owner.
Lauder also belongs to the following organizations: president of the World
Jewish Congress, Jewish Theological Seminary, ADL (Anti-Defamation League),
American-Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, World Jewish Congress, and
president of the Jewish National Fund. Lastly, Lauder began a training school for
Mossad agents located in Herzliya, Israel.
Stephen A. Schwartzman (Jewish): He fits into the picture as president and
CEO of the Blackstone Group, which held the mortgage for WTC 7. This 47-story
structure fell at 5:20 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2001. WTC 7 housed Rudy Giuliani’s
emergency command bunker on the 23rd floor. Schwartzman also holds
membership in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Maurice Greenberg (Jewish): As CEO-godfather of AIG (American
International Group), Greenberg boasted of being the largest U.S. underwriter of
commercial and industrial insurance in 2001. Greenberg’s family ran 3 subsidiary
companies (Marsh McLennan, ACE and Kroll) that originally insured the WTC
complex after Larry Silverstein purchased it. Then, prior to 9-11 they sold their
share of these contracts to other companies, who were left footing the monumental
insurance bill paid to Silverstein.
Ironically, in the years following 9-11, Greenberg’s AIG made enormous
amounts of money from increased insurance hikes that were blamed on
‘terrorism.’ AIG subsequently received billions in bailout money under the
government’s TARP program.
Greenberg also served as director of the New York Federal Reserve, CFR
deputy chairman, and was closely affiliated with Shaul Eisenberg of the Mossad.
In 1993, Greenberg’s AIG—along with the Blackstone Group—purchased a
private spy agency named Kroll Associates. Kroll conveniently became
responsible for security at the WTC complex. It’s been speculated that Mossad
demolition experts were provided access to the WTC towers via connections
between Greenberg and Kroll Associates.
Jeffrey Greenberg (Jewish): CFR member and chairman of Marsh
McLennan, a company that originally insured the WTC complex after Larry
Silverstein’s purchase.
Evan Greenberg (Jewish): CFR member and CEO of ACE Limited, a
company that originally insured the WTC complex after Larry Silverstein’s
purchase.
Michael Cherkasky (Jewish): CEO of Kroll Associates.
Zim Israel Navigation Company (Jewish owned): As one of the world’s
largest shipping container companies, they rented space in WTC 1 on the 16th and
17th floors until a few days before it was felled via a controlled demolition. When
Zim broke their lease and frantically vacated the premises, they forfeited a
$50,000 security deposit. Zim was nearly half-owned by the nation of Israel, while
its other owner was Frank Lowy (Jewish).
FBI agent Michael Dick, who had already been investigating Israeli spy rings
inside the U.S., delved into Zim’s suspicious move. Michael Chertoff (Jewish) of
the Justice Dept.’s criminal division interjected and removed Dick from his duties.
Salomon Brothers (Jewish): In 1988, they signed a long-term lease for WTC
7, thereby becoming its primary tenants. WTC 7 is also known as the Salomon
Brothers Building.
LARRY SILVERSTEIN AND WTC 7

“Lucky” Larry Silvestein (Jewish): On July 24, 2001 Silverstein finagled a
99-year lease for the WTC complex. At that time, each 110-story tower had
become a white elephant because they were teeming with asbestos. The cost of
removing these toxic materials was estimated at $1 billion.
In fact, asbestos covered every steel beam in the towers, so city officials were
more than willing to dump this albatross rather than renovate the towers to meet
code requirements. Further, the towers were technologically outdated and suffered
from inefficient elevator systems. Only partially leased, WTC 1 and WTC 2 had
become a serious financial burden. As part of the package to obtain this
complex—only weeks prior to Sept. 11, 2001—Silverstein’s $15 million
investment included a reworked insurance policy to cover terrorist acts. In Apr.
2004 he won an award of $4.8 billion as a result of the 9-11 attacks.
WTC 7 Collapse: By 9:03 a.m. on the morning of Sept. 11, the north and
south towers had already been struck by flying missiles. However, at 9:30 a.m.,
New York City attorney Michael Hess and Barry Jennings, deputy director of
NYC emergency services, both heard internal explosions inside WTC 7. No
airliner of any kind had impacted this structure, and neither of the twin towers had
yet collapsed.
At 11:30 a.m., even though there were no fires inside WTC 7, Larry Silverstein
lied by claiming that he ordered all firefighters out of the building. No firemen
whatsoever were inside WTC 7 at that time.
Jeffrey Shapiro (Jewish): A reporter for Fox News, Shapiro claimed that
several NYPD officers told him that they overheard Silverstein speaking on the
telephone to his insurance carrier to determine whether they’d authorize a
controlled demolition of WTC 7.
At 1:00 p.m., policemen were already clearing the area around WTC 7 for a
demolition. A woman present on the scene—4 ½ hours before the building fell—
insisted that fire department officials told her the structure was going to be
“brought down.”
By 2:20 p.m., a CNN video shows an unidentified rescuer yelling, “Keep your
eye on that building. It’ll be coming down soon.”
This same CNN video depicts at 2:25 p.m. a second unidentified rescuer
chiming in, “The building’s about to blow up. Moving back . . . we’re walking
back. There’s a building about to blow up.”
Rescuers were informed at 3:00 p.m. that WTC 7 was going to collapse.
Ground Zero workers could be seen congregating and waiting for the tower to
“blow up.” In contrast, deputy fire chief Nick Visconti later observed, “One
command was, oh, that building is never coming down; it didn’t get hit by a plane.
Why isn’t somebody in there putting the fire out?”
By late afternoon, two small fires had mysteriously broken out on the 7th and
12th floors.
Firehouse magazine reported that at approximately 3:30 p.m. anyone near
WTC 7 was pulled back because it would soon be coming down. The clairvoyance
of all these individuals is amazing. Still, John Norman, battalion chief, didn’t
believe their assessments. He said, “I looked at 7 World Trade Center. There was
smoke showing, but not a lot, and I’m saying that it isn’t going to fall.”
His professional opinion cannot be denied, for never in the history of
architecture has a steel-framed building collapsed due to fire. Never, especially
one that hadn’t been subjected to an airline strike and only suffered from 2
miniscule office fires.
CNN correspondent Aaron Brown committed a glaring error by announcing on
live television at 4:15 p.m., “Building 7 in the WTC complex is on fire and has
either collapsed, or is collapsing.” This pronouncement predated the controlled
demolition by one hour and five minutes.
Firefighter Scott Holowach told of how it seemed as if everyone knew the
tower was going to collapse, even though no visible damage existed. “We ended
up back on Vesey Street and West Street just hanging out until tower 7 came
down.”
Paramedic Steven Pilla reiterated this thought. “We didn’t go any further
because building number seven was coming down. That was another problem to
wait for building seven to come down.”
BBC correspondent Jane Stanley blurted to a live British audience at 5:08 p.m.
that WTC 7 had just collapsed, 12 minutes before it actually fell. WTC 7 can still
be seen standing in the television shot behind her. Ms. Stanley had obviously read
prematurely from her script, similar to CNN’s Aaron Brown.
A CNN broadcast televised live only minutes before WTC 7 imploded showed
a man on the street saying with horror, “The whole thing is about to blow up. The
building is about to blow up.” A huge explosion is heard on camera, followed by
the man yelling, “We gotta get back. Seven is exploding!”
Another television broadcast showed a frantic FDNY member ushering people
away from WTC 7. “There’s a bomb in the building,” he screamed. “Start clearing
out.” At that moment a magnificent explosion is clearly heard emanating from
WTC 7, so loud that it’s unmistakably captured on film.
Kevin McPadden, also present at the scene, is recorded on film relating how a
Red Cross worker told him, “You have to stay behind this line because they’re
thinking about bringing the building down.” McPadden said he next heard
someone doing a countdown . . . 3-2-1 . . . then the sound of huge explosions as
the ground rumbled. WTC 7 lay in a pile of rubble 7 seconds later.
An emergency worker who moonlit as a first-year NYC medical student stood
before WTC 7 where he heard what sounded like a clap of thunder emanating
from inside the building. Seconds later he saw a shockwave rippling through this
structure as windows proceeded to shatter outward. Almost immediately
thereafter, WTC 7 folded in upon itself and imploded.
Larry Silverstein later recalled during a Sept. 10, 2002 PBS broadcast of
America Rebuilds, “We’ve had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest
thing to do is pull it [WTC 7]. And they [the fire department] made the decision to
pull, and we watched the building collapse.”
Silverstein also mentioned trying to “contain the fire” despite the fact that only
2 miniscule blazes burned inside the building. Not a single person died in WTC 7,
which contradicts Silverstein’s claim of a “terrible loss of life.” In the vernacular
of construction industry workers, to “pull a building” specifically refers to a
controlled demolition. By the way, WTC 7 also housed a clandestine New York
CIA station, not to mention Rudy Giuliani’s emergency bunker on the 23rd floor.
Many researchers in the know assert that the 23rd floor provided a perfect vantage
point to view the twin towers, and thus served as an operational command center
to carry out the controlled demolitions of WTC 1 and WTC 2.
Following the collapse of WTC 7, CBS anchor Dan Rather observed live on
the air that it was “reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on
television before where buildings are deliberately destroyed by well-placed
dynamite to knock it down.”
Ariel ‘the Butcher’ Sharon (Jewish) and Benjamin Netanyahu (Jewish):
Both Israeli prime ministers were close acquaintances of Larry Silverstein. Prior to
9-11, Netanyahu and Silverstein spoke on the phone every Sunday afternoon.
Netanyahu coined the “war on terror” term in his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism.
Roger and Lisa Silverstein (both Jewish): Each of Larry Silverstein’s
children worked for their father in the WTC towers, yet both failed to show up at
work on the morning of 9-11 because they were “running late.” Further,
Silverstein religiously had breakfast every single morning at the north tower’s
‘Windows of the World’ restaurant located on the 107th floor. However, on
September 11th he was absent from his routine due to a “doctor’s appointment.”
No wonder he earned the nickname “Lucky Larry.”
Rudolph Giuliani (Zionist): On the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001 ABC News
anchor Peter Jennings interviewed New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who
slipped when saying, “We set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street when we were
told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse. And it did collapse before
we could actually get out of the building.”
Some pivotal questions arise from his statement, such as: (a) how was Giuliani
warned about this ominous event, (b) who precisely predicted the WTC collapses,
and (c) why would someone anticipate such a catastrophe when firefighters
exhibited full confidence in being able to douse the miniscule office fires?
More importantly, since never before in history had a steel-framed skyscraper
collapsed due to fire or from being struck by a flying object, why would anyone
suddenly say that on this specific day, that trend would be reversed? In addition,
other steel-framed buildings raged under extreme inferno conditions—far worse
than what happened to the twin towers—and not a single one fell.
Why would anyone expect WTC 1 and 2 to inexplicably drop at freefall speed?
Unless, of course, they knew each tower—along with WTC 7—was wired to the
gills with explosive charges (or even worse).
Years later, when questioned in 2007 abut this strange revelation by a 9-11
truth activist, Giuliani lied, “I didn’t know the towers were going to collapse.” But
when his words were replayed verbatim to him, Giuliani hemmed and hawed that
he thought they were going to fall “over a long period of time” . . . “in seven to ten
hours” . . . “the way other buildings collapsed.”
But again, no steel-framed high-rise ever fell due to fire, despite some of them
being ablaze for up to 48 hours. Lastly, when Giuliani uttered, “It did collapse
before we could actually get out of the building,” he did so with a distinct sense of
urgency . . . not as someone who nonchalantly dismissed the collapse as a future
event later that day.
Bruce Teitelbaum (Orthodox Jewish Zionist): Rudy Giuliani’s primary
fundraiser and chief-of-staff
Sarah Kasirer (Jewish): Along with her husband Bruce Teitelbaum, Kasirer
coordinated Mayor Giuliani’s interactions with the Jewish community in New
York City. She also served on the National Jewish Democratic Council and was
the vice president of a Zionist organization named Edah.
Richard Sheirer (Jewish): As Giuliani’s right-hand man and commissioner of
the mayor’s Office of Emergency Management, Schierer authorized and oversaw
the removal of crucial evidence from Ground Zero, then had it transported to
nearby waste yards.
SECURITY
To augment the enormous endeavor of planting explosives inside the twin
towers, as well as subverting the airports involved in this false-flag attack, security
had to be controlled by a host of rogue agencies associated with the plot.
Jules and Jeremy Kroll (Jewish): This father-son combo owned Kroll
Associates, a firm responsible for security at the WTC complex. Alternately
known as “Wall Street’s CIA” due to their shadowy connections, Kroll received
their security contract from NYC’s Port Authority following the failed 1993
bombing. Lewis Eisenberg (Jewish) led New York’s Port Authority.
Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex, can be tied to Jules Kroll via his
wife. Mrs. Kroll worked with Silverstein at the United Jewish Appeal Federation,
Israel’s largest fundraising organization. Kroll himself knew Silverstein through
their affiliation with New York’s Citizens Budget Commission.
Since Kroll had full access to the twin towers, no one would have been in a
better position to allow an outside agency to wire these buildings with explosives,
or even miniature tactical nukes.
Jerome Hauer (Jewish): Managing director of Kroll Associates at the time of
9-11, Hauer was a staunch Zionist whose mother served as honorary president for
New York’s Hadassah chapter of the Daughters of Zion.
Hauer also acted as the director of Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s Office of
Emergency Management (OEM) from 1996-2000 where he spearheaded the
construction of a pivotal command bunker on the 23rd floor of WTC 7.
Incredibly, only minutes after the collapse of the north and south towers, none
other than Jerome Hauer appeared on the CBS news network with anchor Dan
Rather, whereupon he expertly laid out the government’s ‘official’ cover story.
According to Hauer, the towers fell after being impacted by high velocity planes.
Then, when coupled with intense heat from the fires, each building’s structural
integrity eventually weakened, causing them to fall.
Of course, each of these factors has been thoroughly debunked. At any rate,
how Hauer could have known so many intricate engineering details on the
morning of 9-11, without any investigation, is unfathomable. It appeared as if he
were reading note-for-note from the 9-11 Commission Report published nearly 3
years later on July 22, 2004.
Hauer’s reach extended even further. One week prior to the faux anthrax
mailings, he advised the White House that they should stockpile Cipro, an
antibiotic used to deflect the effects of anthrax. Later, he took charge of NIH’s
(National Institute of Health) response to the anthrax scare, repeatedly blaming
Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda as the culprits.
Last but not least, Hauer hired FBI agent John O’Neil as head of security at the
World Trade Center. O’Neil, also known as Osama bin Laden’s number one
nemesis, resigned from the FBI because his superiors continually thwarted his
investigations following the USS Cole attack in Yemen. Of course, bin Laden
needed to remain free so that the U.S. government could blame him as their
Orwellian perfect enemy and 9-11 bogeyman.
O’Neil curiously died on his first day at work inside the WTC towers on the
morning of 9-11.
Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzman (both Jewish): Owners of ICTS
International, these men were responsible for security procedures at both departure
airports involved in the 9-11 ‘hijackings’. Many of their employees formerly
belonged to Israeli intelligence, or were Shin Bet agents. Atzman acted as a
treasurer for Israel’s Likud political party during the 1980s, and was convicted of
campaign finance fraud in 1996.
According to Wayne Madsen’s article, Mossad Run 9-11 Arab ‘Hijacker’
Terrorist Operation, “In Aug. 2001 the first Mossad team flew with [Mohammed]
Atta and other Hamburg ‘al Qaeda’ members to Boston. Logan International
Airport’s security was contracted to Huntleigh USA, a firm owned by an Israeli
airport security firm closely connected to Mossad—International Consultants on
Targeted Security (ICTS). ICTS’s owners were politically connected to the Likud
Party, particularly the Netanyahu faction, and then-Jerusalem mayor and future
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
Patriot Act—authored by Michael Chertoff (Jewish) and his lackey, Viet
Dinh: Inserted into this legislation at the last minute was language that made
‘foreign security companies’ such as ICTS immune from 9-11 lawsuits. Even
more damning, any individuals involved in future court battles weren’t granted
access to this information prior to their legal proceedings. In effect, ICTS and
other similar firms were shielded from providing any evidence regarding their
connection to 9-11.
Dinh later helped defend two former AIPAC employees—Steven Rosen
(Jewish) and Keith Weissman (Jewish)—for violating provisions of the U.S.
Espionage Act.
Ehud Olmert (Jewish): Former Israeli prime minister from 2006-2009,
Olmert requested that his former colleague, Menachem Atzman of ICTS, handle
security at the 9-11 departure airports.
As the Likud mayor of Jerusalem in 2001, Olmert secretly visited NYC on
Sept. 10, 2001 on the eve of 9-11. Not a single newspaper or media outlet reported
Olmert’s clandestine trip until years later.
Marvin Burns (Jewish): The engineering firm Burns and Roe Securacom
later became Securacom, which landed security contracts for the WTC complex,
Dulles International Airport and United Airlines (all of whom had direct
connections to 9-11).
Securacom oversaw security at the World Trade Center, and had on its board
of directors Marvin Bush, brother of Pres. George W. Bush.
Micha Macover (Jewish): CEO of Odigo, a Herzliya, Israeli-based instant
messaging provider located only 2 blocks from the WTC complex. [Herzliya is, by
the way, home of the Mossad.] 2 hours prior to the 9-11 attacks, Odigo admitted
that they issued warnings to at least 2 employees. Macover is quoted as saying, “I
have no idea why the message was sent to these 2 workers, who didn’t know the
sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they
accidentally got it right.” A joke? How could anyone take that explanation
seriously?
Yuval Dror (Jewish) of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz disclosed in an Apr. 10,
2004 article entitled Odigo Says Workers Were Warned of Attack, “Odigo, the
instant messaging service, says that 2 of its workers received messages 2 hours
before the twin towers attack on Sept. 11 predicting the attack would happen.”
Macover confirmed these revelations. “2 workers received the messages and
immediately after the terror attack informed the company’s management.” Odigo
proceeded to notify the Mossad and FBI, yet FBI agents failed to relay this
information to occupants and employees at the twin towers.
By best estimates, only 3 Jews died inside the towers on the morning of Sept.
11. In addition, on Sept. 10, 2001 a Tokyo branch of the Jewish-controlled
Goldman Sachs banking empire warned its American colleagues to avoid
buildings in New York City the next day.
Amdocs (main computer systems located in Israel): They controlled the
voluminous records of practically every telephone call made in the U.S. by the 25
largest phone companies. They were also responsible for billing and directory
assistance for 90 percent of U.S. phone companies and were able to perform
‘traffic analysis’ to determine any ‘patterns’ in communications. Amdocs was
fingered for selling their phone records on the sly.
The documentary Missing Links unequivocally characterized Amdocs
influence in these terms. “It is virtually impossible to make a call on a land-line
without generating an Amdocs record.”
Jacob ‘Kobi’ Alexander (Jewish): Connected to the Mossad, Alexander (a
dual Jewish-Israeli citizen) was CEO of an Israeli company named Comverse
Infosys, which also purchased Odigo instant messaging service.
During a 4-part series for Fox News, Carl Cameron reported, “Comverse
works closely with the Israeli government and under special programs gets
reimbursed for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by the
Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade.”
Comverse was the primary source provider of computer equipment to the
federal government, which in turn was used for wiretapping. In this context, they
were responsible for installing automatic tapping equipment into practically every
phone across the United States. Israeli agents were then able—at their discretion—
to hear nearly every phone conversation in America if they so desired. These taps
could not be detected because they were automatically integrated into the telecom
systems.
Along with Amdocs, Comverse was caught illegally selling telephone data,
while also possessing the capabilities to build back doors into their phone systems.
Anyone with access to this technology could eavesdrop instantly on a targeted
phone conversation, whether authorized or unauthorized.
Comverse is largely recognized as the company that recorded Pres. Bill
Clinton’s sex chats with Monica Lewinsky. This data was then used to blackmail
him.
Checkpoint Systems (headquartered in Israel): Responsible for a large
percentage of firewalls installed into computers for both the federal government
and large U.S. corporations. Checkpoint was able to install backdoors into the
firewalls of these computers, allowing them unlimited access.
Amit Yoran (Jewish): As founder and director of a database security firm
called Guardium, Yoran was a manager of computer security at the Pentagon. He
later became a cyber-security czar for Michael Chertoff’s Department of
Homeland Security.
Michael S. Goff (Jewish): Marketing manager of Ptech, a computer firm
whose software was loaded with an array of Trojan horses and trapdoors. Their
products became an integral part of the United States’ most sensitive computerized
national security systems that failed to automatically scramble fighter jets during
the high-alert emergencies of 9-11.
Goff was also under the employ of Guardium and another computer software
firm named Mitre. Both Ptech and Mitre held office space at the FAA (Federal
Aviation Administration), and thus coordinated information technology efforts
between NORAD, the Air Force, FBI, Army and the FAA. Any of these entities
could have been remotely manipulated via this backdoor software, and all were
severely compromised on 9-11.
THE DANCING ISRAELIES & URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS

If one were to randomly survey 100 people and ask them who were the first
individuals arrested following the 9-11 attacks, it’s safe to say that most would
reply, “Muslims.” However, largely due to unrelenting media conditioning, they
would be mistaken.
Sivan & Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari
(all Jewish): Minutes after WTC 1 was struck by an airliner, the FBI’s Newark
field office issued a BOLO (Be On Lookout) bulletin for a group of men that were
driving a van that had recently left a New Jersey waterfront property. The alert
read, in part, “White 2000 Chevrolet van with an ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on
back. Seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, New Jersey at the time of first
impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Individuals with van were seen
celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosions. FBI Newark Field
Office requests that if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.”
Shortly thereafter, the van was located and stopped. The 5 men inside [see
above names—all Jewish] were arrested. When a police officer initially
approached their van, Sivan Kurzberg told him, “We are Israelis. We are not your
problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”
Policemen soon discovered that these 5 suspects, later known as the Dancing
Israelis, were dressed as Arabs. When searched, their van contained:
• $4,700 cash
• Foreign passports
• Box cutters
• Maps of New York City with certain monuments highlighted
• Recently taken photos of the men celebrating as the WTC towers burned in
the background. Some of them were audacious enough to hold lighters in front of
the camera, like teenagers do at rock concerts.
NBC News reported that when their van was eventually stopped before
reaching the Holland Tunnel, the following message was called into Jersey City
police dispatchers. “There’s a minivan heading toward the Holland Tunnel. I see a
guy by the Newark Airport mixing some junk, and he has a sheikh uniform.”
Officers later revealed to the Bergen Record, “Bomb-sniffing dogs were
brought to the van and they reacted as if they had smelled explosives.”
The Bergen Record also disclosed on Sept. 12, “Sources close to the
investigation said they found evidence linking these men to the bombing plot.”
On Oct. 16, 2001 Israel National Review featured the following news blurb.
“The Israeli detainees were suspected of plotting to blow up a New York bridge,
although this allegation never reached most Americans who were being told of
‘Muslim plots’ against America.”
Indeed, a second group of Israelis were caught with truck bombs near the
George Washington Bridge, while a third contingent was apprehended inside a van
with a mural painted on its side depicting the 9-11 attacks. Police suspected that
the men intended to blow up the bridge.
CNN’s Deborah Feverick reinforced this information, stating that law
enforcement officials found tons of explosives inside a van near the George
Washington Bridge. Dan Rather of CBS News similarly reported that a truckload
of explosives was discovered in close proximity to the George Washington Bridge.
Arresting police officer Scott DeCarlo later explained that the Israelis lied
about their circumstances by claiming they were driving along Manhattan’s West
Side Highway when the twin towers were impacted.
Their attempted deception is abundantly clear as can be determined from this
excerpt by an unidentified caller who notified the Jersey City Police.
Dispatcher: Jersey City Police
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, two or three guys in there. They look like
Palestinians and they’re going around a building.
Caller: There’s a minivan heading toward the Holland Tunnel. I see the guy by
Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has a sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He’s dressed like an Arab.
Forward (New York City-based Jewish weekly): The Mar. 15, 2002 edition
of this publication noted that on the morning of 9-11, 2 of the men detained in a
van were in the possession of explosives that they intended to use in order to
blowup the George Washington Bridge. They added that FBI officials concluded
that at least 2 of the passengers inside the van were Mossad agents.
Along with the box cutters and bomb-making materials, each of the occupants
inside the van carried return airplane tickets back to Israel. Although Fox News
and KHOU-TV originally reported these incidents, they soon removed the Israeli
art student stories from their websites.
Ram Horvitz (Jewish): As the Israeli attorney for Paul Kurzberg, Horvitz
explained that the heartless and inhumane celebratory behavior seen in the
photographs could be attributed to nothing more than “youthful foolishness.” He
also proposed that his client refused to take a polygraph test because he “once
worked for Israeli intelligence in another country.”
Mark Regev (Jewish): As Israel’s embassy spokesman in Washington, DC he
likewise dismissed espionage charges against the 5 Dancing Israelis,
characterizing their excitement over the twin tower collapses as “youthful
foolishness.”
To the contrary, their developed film showed these monstrous individuals
sporting happy expressions as the twin towers smoldered behind them. This
exuberance was exhibited both in New Jersey’s Liberty State Park, and later atop a
roof in Weehawken, New Jersey.
Eyewitnesses provided these accounts of their behavior:
• “They were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery.”
• “They seemed to be taking a movie. They were like happy; you know, they
didn’t look shocked to me. I thought it was strange.”
• “They were jumping for joy after the initial impact.”
• “They were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the
World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves
in front of the wreckage.”
• “Still more witnesses saw them celebrating with high fives.”
On Sept. 14, 2001 Fox News confirmed these reports. “A group of 5 men had
setup video cameras aimed at the twin towers prior to the attacks on Tuesday, and
were seen congratulating one another afterwards.”
In the Sept. 12, 2001 edition of The Bergen Record, staff writer Paulo Lima
interviewed an eyewitness at Liberty State Park, who recalled the Dancing Israelis.
“It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was
going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.”
While every other person on the planet Earth reeled with shock and fear, these
sub-humans cheered the destruction and carnage while jumping up and down.
Oded Ellner (Jewish): After being extradited back to his home country of
Israel, Ellner—along with 2 of the other Dancing Israelis—appeared on an Israeli
television talk show in Nov. 2001. When asked why they were so close to the
action on the morning of Sept. 11 (i.e. filming the WTC collapse), Ellner replied,
“The fact of the matter is: we are coming from a country that experiences terror
daily. Our purpose was to document the event.”
The most obvious question is: how did these young men even know there was
an event to document? Hardly anybody else in America (except the plotters) did.
In this light, a persistent question continues to be asked in 9-11 circles. When
did these men set-up their film equipment to ‘document the event?’ CIA agent
Robert Baer confirmed that their cameras were put in place prior to when
American Airlines Flight 11—or a craft purported to be AA 11—struck WTC 1.
Other eyewitnesses agree that the Dancing Israelis had prepared their equipment
before the first plane’s impact. They then proceeded to congratulate one another
afterward.
Dominic Suter (Jewish): Owner of a New Jersey-based company named
Urban Moving Systems. Suter employed art students more commonly known as
the Dancing Israelis.
Vince Cannistraro, a CIA counterterrorism operations chief, stated that within
the intelligence community, Urban Moving Systems was acknowledged as a
Mossad operation.
The Forward, Israeli’s leading weekly newspaper, reported that an unnamed
U.S. government official told them, “The assessment was that Urban Moving
Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it. The conclusion
of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs.”
The FBI had Suter on a “suspect list for his suspected involvement in terror
attacks.” Other law enforcement reports stressed, “Urban Moving has been set up
or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical
Islamists.”
In the days following 9-11, authorities interrogated Suter on one occasion, but
upon their return, they discovered that he had fled to . . . Israel.
According to residents in the neighborhood near Suter’s Urban Moving
Systems in Weehawken, N.J., when FBI agents eventually searched his
warehouse, they uncovered pipes, detonator caps, traces of anthrax, fertilizer and
other chemicals used in making explosives.
An Urban Moving Systems employee later told the Bergen Record that his
Israeli coworkers “laughed about the Manhattan attacks the day they happened. I
was in tears, but these guys were joking, and that bothered me. These guys were
like, now America knows what we go through.”
In Wayne Madsen’s aforementioned article, he reports, “The Mossad cell
operating in the Jersey City-Weehawken area of New Jersey through Urban
Moving Systems was suspected by some in the FBI and CIA of being involved in
moving explosives into the World Trade Center.”
Note: On June 22, 2001 Suter’s Urban Moving Systems received a $498,750
‘loan’ from the Small Business Administration, which is an agency within the
United States government. Shortly after 9-11, Suter fled to Israel.
Roy Barak and Motti Butbul (both Jewish): Around noon on Sept. 12, 2001
Barak, a former Israeli paratrooper, and Butbul—both employed at Urban Moving
Systems as drivers—were stopped by law enforcement officials near York, Pa.
Inside their van police found box cutters. Following a lie detector test, the FBI
suspected that Barak was either a terrorist and/or Mossad spy.
Michael Chertoff (Jewish): After the Dancing Israelis were imprisoned in a
high security section of the Metropolitan Detention Center known as the
Administrative Maximum Special Housing Unit, dual-Israeli citizen Michael
Chertoff of the Justice Dept. was the man most responsible for securing their
freedom in Nov. 2001.
The Dancing Israelis were therefore quietly released and sent back to their
homeland after being detained for 71 days. On Mar. 7, 2007 Christopher
Ketcham’s article for Counterpunch (High Fivers and Art Student Spies: What Did
Israel Know in Advance of the 9-11 Attacks) contained the following bombshell.
“A former CIA counterterrorism expert told me: There was no question but that
(the orders to close the investigation) came from the White House. It was
immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a
cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9-11.”
Ehud Olmert (Jewish): Jerusalem’s mayor interjected himself into this
predicament by lobbying his pal, New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, to have
these Israeli nationals released.
When the men were originally taken into custody, they claimed to be enrolled
at Israel’s Bezalel Academy of Art and Design. But when Pnina Calpen (Jewish),
a representative of this institute, was contacted, she denied that any of these
individuals ever studied there during the past decade.
Rather, all of these men had actually been employed by the Israeli military
and/or intelligence. Their occupations included:
• Electronic intercept operator
• Bodyguard to an IDF (Israeli Defense Force) commander
• Demolition/explosives ordnance specialist
• Intelligence officer
• Special Forces member
• Son of an IDF two-star general
It’s not a stretch of the imagination to conclude that these specialties would be
fitting for anyone intending to carry out a series of terrorist attacks.
MASTERMIND?
Rabbi Dov Zakheim (Jewish): On May 4, 2001 the Dept. of Defense
appointed Dov Zakheim as their comptroller and CFO. 4 months later on Sept. 10,
2001—one day prior to the Sept. 11 attacks—Sec. of Def. Donald Rumsfeld
announced at a press conference that the Pentagon had inadvertently ‘lost’ $2.3
trillion in military spending. Rummy’s exact words were, “According to some
estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions.”
This money supposedly vanished into thin air . . . or could there be another
explanation? As comptroller, Zakheim’s primary duty as chief bean counter was to
oversee the Pentagon’s books. If $2.3 trillion disappeared on his watch, where did
it go?
Plausibly, certain individuals who sold their souls to facilitate the 9-11 attacks
were handsomely paid-off. Were these funds pilfered from the DOD coffers under
the guidance of Dov Zakheim?
To understand this man, it’s necessary to know that Zakheim’s grandfather was
a Russian rabbi that married a member of Karl Marx’s (Jewish) family. On the
other hand, his father belonged to Betar, a murderous Jewish terror organization
that joined forces with notorious gangs such as Stern, Haganah and Irgun.
Zakheim was educated in a Jewish temple as a schul rabbi. He later attended
the London School of Jewish Studies where he became acquainted with Talmudic
Jewish Mysteries. After arriving in New York, Zakheim taught economics at
Yeshiva Univ.
As a dual Israeli-American citizen, Zakehim became a columnist for the
Jerusalem Post and an editorial board member for Israeli Affairs. He also holds
membership in the CFR, and was an integral member of the highly influential
Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
In Sept. 2000 Zakheim signed onto the PNAC’s pivotal and controversial
manifesto—Rebuilding America’s Defenses—that served as a Pax Americana
blueprint for the 9-11 attacks. In essence, this PNAC missive stated: we need a
catastrophic and catalyzing event, reminiscent of Pearl Harbor, that will properly
reconfigure the American mindset and mobilize them to accept another series of
long, protracted wars in the Middle East and Eurasia.
Other luminaries to sign this document were:
• Richard Perle – Jewish
• Paul Wolfowitz – Jewish
• Eliot Abrams – Jewish
• John Bolton – Jewish
• William Kristol – Jewish
• Aaron Friedberg – Jewish
• Lewis Libby – Jewish
• Norman Podhoretz – Jewish
• Henry S. Rowen – Jewish
• Vin Weber – Jewish
• Robert S. Zoellick – Jewish
• Donald Rumsfeld – Zionist
• James Woolsey – Zionist
• Richard Armitage – Zionist
• William Bennett – Zionist
Zakheim’s direct hands-on connections to the events of 9-11 are quite
damning, especially since many researchers have concluded that the planes
impacting WTC 1 and WTC 2 were remotely controlled. First, he acted as CEO
and corporate vice president for Systems Planning Corp., a defense contractor that
specialized in the design of electronic warfare technologies and remote controlled
aircraft systems. These Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) allowed ground
controllers to remotely takeover the command of an aircraft.
Systems Planning Corp. manufactured flight termination technology for the
Radar Physics Group, who produced a scientifically advanced Flight Termination
System. This creation could remotely control aircraft, including passenger jets. It
also held the capability to overtake up to 10 different flights at a time, in addition
to overriding the pilot’s onboard controls to terminate its mission.
Systems Planning Corp. also owned a subsidiary known as Tridata Group that,
after the 1993 WTC bombing, was tasked to investigate this FBI-coordinated
crime. Therefore, Tridata—and Dov Zakheim—now had access to all of the WTC
blueprints, as well as a familiarity with the building’s structural integrity.
Lastly, during his tenure at the Pentagon, the military ‘lost’ 56 fighter planes,
32 tanks, and 36 Javelin missile command launch units. Zakheim further brokered
a contract where 32 Boeing aircraft were shipped to Florida’s MacDill Air Force
Base as part of a tanker lease deal. He also sold numerous F-15s and F-16s to
Israel at an enormously reduced rate.
Israeli Aerospace Industries (Jewish owned): Various airlines leased planes
equipped with FTS (Flight Termination Systems) from this company.
ISRAEL AND THE MOSSAD
To gauge how Israeli leaders—as well as their counterparts in world
government, the media, and academia—viewed the 9-11 attacks, an examination
of their words is very eye opening.
Benjamin Netanyahu (Jewish): Considered by many to be one of the primary
architects of 9-11, Bibi has been a prominent member of the war-mongering Likud
Party since 1993. Likudians were the successors of a Jewish terrorist organization
known as Irgun.
Netanyahu is closely associated with WTC complex owner Larry Silverstein,
and in his 1995 book, Fighting Terrorism, he coined the seminal phrase, “The war
on terror.”
When asked by the New York Times what 9-11 meant to the nation of Israel, he
replied, “It’s very good. Well, not very good . . . but it will generate immediate
sympathy.”
Later, an Israeli newspaper called Ma’ariv reported that Bibi told an audience
at Bar Islan, “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the twin
towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.” He added that these
catastrophes and wars would “swing American public opinion in our favor.”
Ehud Sprinzak (Jewish): A terrorism expert at Jerusalem’s Hebrew
University, he said that from Israel’s perspective, 9-11 was the most important
public relations act ever committed in their favor.
Ami Ayalon (Jewish): As head of the Israeli military, he disclosed that since
Sept. 11, his nation’s leaders have been euphoric.
Ariel Sharon (Jewish): Israeli prime minister when the Sept. 11 attacks
occurred. On Oct. 3, 2001 he made a bold statement to Shimon Peres (Jewish)
during an appearance on the Kil Yisrael Radio show. “Every time we do
something you tell me America will do this and will do that. I want to tell you
something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the
Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Sharon, oddly clairvoyant, canceled his address to an Israeli lobbyist group in
New York City on the eve of 9-11.
Ehud Olmert (Jewish): As Jerusalem’s mayor, he felt his duties transcended
mere national politics. So, on Sept. 10, 2001 he furtively visited New York City,
an event that went unreported in the media for years. Who did he meet in the Big
Apple, and why were the details of his trip so secretive?
Isser Harel (Jewish): A notorious Israeli spymaster and terrorist, Harel
delivered a prediction to American-Zionist Michael D. Evans on Sept. 23, 1980
that New York City, specifically the World Trade Center towers, would be the
target of a ‘bombing’ sometime in the future. His reasoning: NYC existed as the
symbol of ‘freedom and capitalism’ . . . the same exact mantra repeated ad
nauseum by corporate media hacks on the morning of Sept. 11. Harel harbored an
obsessive fixation with the twin towers.
Coincidentally, Harel’s past duties included: Dir. of Haganah intelligence, a
member of Shin Bet, and Mossad chief.
Daniel Lewin (Jewish): A member of the Israel Defense Force’s (IDF)
Sayeret Matkal commando unit that specialized in ‘anti-hijacking’ takeover
maneuvers. Allegedly, Lewin was aboard Flight 11 on 9-11, whereupon he
struggled with one of the purported al-Qaeda terrorists. Initial reports had him
being shot, but since that angle didn’t fit into the prearranged 9-11 script,
spokesmen later altered their story, characterizing him as a stabbing victim.
Although Flight 11 had the capacity to carry 165 passengers, only 76 of the
seats were supposedly filled on the morning of 9-11. What are the odds that 5
Muslim terrorists, in addition to a high-level IDF Special Forces operative, were
all passengers on the identical flight that touted such an inordinately low
occupancy rate? Then, this same flight gets ‘hijacked’ and is flown into New
York’s north tower.
Prince Nayef: Saudi Arabian Interior Minister. He asked journalists, “Who has
benefited from the Sept. 11 attacks? I think the Jews were the protagonists of such
attacks.”
Hamid Gul: Pakistani General and former director of Pakistan’s Intelligence
Service (ISI). He categorically proclaimed to Arnaud de Borchgrave of United
Press International in the weeks following 9-11, “The Israeli Mossad and its
American associates are the obvious culprits.”
When asked, “Who did September 11?” he continued, “Mossad and its
accomplices. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World
Trade Center, CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece
of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put
public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from
thinking for themselves.”
Finally, he commented, “The attacks against New York and Washington were
Israeli engineered. The attacks started at 8:45 a.m., and 4 flights are diverted from
their assigned air space and no Air Force fighter jets scramble until 10:00 a.m.
Radars are jammed, transponders fail, and no IFF—Friend or Foe ID—challenge.
In Pakistan, if there is no response to an IFF, jets are instantly scrambled. This was
clearly an inside job.”
Canada’s Stern-Intel: On Sept. 17, 2001 one of their reports implicated
Israel. “A U.S. military intelligence source revealed details of an internal
intelligence memo that points to the Israeli Mossad intelligence service having
links to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.”
Andreas von Buelow: A former member of the German Federal Ministry of
Defense, von Buelow publicly equivocated that Arabs didn’t mastermind 9-11.
Instead, Israel’s Mossad engineered the attacks. He continued, “If what I say is
right, the whole U.S. government should end up behind bars. They have hidden
behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence—that they invented the story
of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda—in order to hide the
truth of their own covert operation.”
Francesco Cossiga: Former Italian president. He told the newspaper Corriere
della Sera, “All the intelligence services of America and Europe know well that
the disastrous attack had been planned and realized by the Mossad, with the aid of
the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries in order to
induce western powers to take part in Iraq and Afghanistan wars.”
Mohamed al-Amir: Author Eric D. Williams quoted this Cairo attorney and
father of one of the suspected 9-11 hijackers in his book, Puzzle of 9-11. “America
knows that it was Mossad who did this operation.”
Muhammad Khalaf: Egyptian general. “If we take into account who sold the
communications systems—they were Israeli and Zionist companies that control
the production of surveillance and communications equipment in the U.S.”
Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Former director of Strategic Studies at the U.S. Army
War College. During a Mar. 2010 radio interview with author Mark Glenn, he
disclosed, “It is 100 percent certain that 9-11 was a Mossad operation, period.” He
added that high-level U.S. military officers are aware of Israel’s role in 9-11.
Professor A.K. Dewdney: In a Jan. 22, 2002 article entitled Ghost Riders in
the Sky, this computer specialist wrote, “A U.S. military intelligence report
revealed details of an internal intelligence memo linking Mossad to the World
Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The memo was in circulation 3 weeks before
the attacks.”
David Stern (Jewish): An expert on Israeli intelligence operations, he claimed
that the Mossad had planned covert operations on U.S. soil to turn public opinion
against Arabs. This plot required high-level military precision and the advanced
resources of our intelligence agencies that were extremely familiar with civilian
flight paths and aerial assault tactics. Familiarity with Air Force One’s flight
operations was also a prerequisite.
Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS): Their Sept. 10, 2001
68-page report focused on the external threats of terrorism. SAMS officers
described the Mossad as such: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to
target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”
William Wendy: A freelance photographer for New York Times magazine. As
he stood outside the Pentagon on 9-11, he recalled during a 2008 interview with
Lisa Guliani of WING TV, “I remember press people talking at the time about
how the whole thing looked like an American-Israeli operation, like the Mossad
had a hand in it. That was the word on the street.”
Dr. Mahathir Mohamad: Former Malaysian prime minister. He stated that
the assault against the U.S. on 9-11 was staged as an excuse to “mount attacks on
the Muslim world” and to subsequently engage in wars.
Alan Hart: As a former BBC senior Middle East correspondent, Hart admitted
that 9-11 was a Mossad operation that would have been aided and abetted by
certain corrupt American leaders.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: During a Sept. 23, 2010 speech before the U.N.
General Assembly, Iran’s president declared that the United States government
orchestrated the 9-11 attacks in order to save the Zionist regime in the Middle
East.
BOOKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 at approximately 6:30 a.m., Pres. Bush
embarked on his standard morning jog near the Colony Beach and Tennis Resort
in Longboat Key, Fla. As he was readying for his run, a van with several ‘Middle
Eastern’ men arrived at the hotel’s security gate and informed secret service agents
that they were there to conduct a ‘poolside’ interview with the commander-inchief.
These men even requested a specific secret service agent, but when their
details didn’t pan out, they were turned away. Later that morning at around the
time when WTC 1 was struck, quite possibly the same van was seen again with
‘Middle Eastern’ men yelling out the window and thrashing their fists in anger,
“Down with Bush.”
Who were these men? It’s impossible to know for certain, but considering the
Israeli penchant for dressing as Arabs and utilizing vans for their operations, could
this simply be another ‘Muslim set-up,’ or was it an authentic attempt to eliminate
America’s leader?
At 8:52 a.m., Pres. George W. Bush entered the Booker Elementary School in
Sarasota, Fla. whereupon he took a seat (with TV cameras rolling) in front of the
students in a classroom. Soon, a black teacher began a lesson where her children
repeated the following words: Kite … hit … steel … plane … must.
It was the morning of 9-11, and these specific words are quite interesting.
‘Kites’ are flying objects that ‘hit’ something ‘steel’ (such as 110-story
skyscrapers); then, more exacting, a ‘plane’ ‘must’ be used.
As this exercise unfolded, another one likewise came to fruition in New York
City, which caused Chief of Staff Andrew Card to whisper—only seconds later—
in Pres. Bush’s ear at 9:07 a.m. that WTC 2 had just been struck by a plane and
that America was now under attack. After delivering this urgent message, Card
walked away.
Ari Fleischer (Jewish): After Card exited the room, White House Spokesman
Ari Fleischer—standing behind the students away from their notice—held up a
piece of paper with the following passage written in capital letters: “DON’T SAY
ANYTHING YET.”
As chaos ensued in the Big Apple, FAA Dir. Jane Garvey reported that up to
11 airliners may have been hijacked at that time. If her initial uncertainties were
accurate, one of those planes may have been aimed at the school in which Pres.
Bush sat (especially since his visit had been well-publicized on local news
stations, as well as on the White House website).
But rather than springing into action, Bush remained inside the classroom for
26 minutes, and then took another 29 minutes to put the military on ‘high alert’.
Meanwhile, the school itself had no protection or air cover. Everyone, including
the students, was a sitting duck, with all of their lives in jeopardy. Still, secret
service agents failed to escort Bush from the premises. Why didn’t they decide to
whisk him away instead of allowing him to stay at a locale that had been publicly
announced?
The president’s handlers later revealed that he didn’t want to upset the kids, an
excuse which seems preposterous. In other words, it’s preferable to be more
worried about their feelings than their lives. So, as he sat for minute after perilous
minute, Bush joked with the youngsters, completely relaxed as if he didn’t have a
care in the world.
Everywhere else—in New York, the nation’s capital, at the FAA, and on
television sets nationwide—pandemonium reached insane levels. But Pres. Bush
sat, on camera, like a fumbling stumblebum.
On the other hand, he now had the perfect alibi. His agents, similarly, didn’t
exhibit the least amount of fear because they knew that there would be no attempt
on the president’s life. The script had already been written, and as Bush sat with
these adolescents, other aspects of the plan were waiting to be executed.
At last, half-an-hour later, Bush stepped into Air Force One and departed from
Florida. Strangely, no military fighter jets accompanied this flight to provide
protection. To magnify the dangers of this helter-skelter situation, Vice President
Cheney informed his commander-in-chief that White House security codes had—
at least according to him—been compromised. This news meant that rather than
returning to Washington, DC, Cheney would remain in charge while Bush rerouted
to Offutt Air Force Base.
Even more peculiar were Bush’s responses to questions (on 2 different
occasions) of when he’d first learned of the 9-11 attacks. In Jan. 2002 at a town
hall meeting in Ontario, Calif. he explained, “When we walked into the classroom,
I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on, and you
know, I thought it was pilot error, and I was amazed that anybody could make
such a terrible mistake.”
On another occasion, he added, “I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to
go in. And I used to fly myself, and I said, well, there’s one terrible pilot. I said, it
must have been a horrible accident.”
Some have excused Bush’s lapse as a slip of the tongue or inadvertent mistake,
but he repeated this story twice at different venues. Therefore, we need to question
his portrayal of events. For starters, when Flight 11 struck WTC 1 it wasn’t
televised live by any local or national networks. Secondly, Bush supposedly didn’t
have access to a television set while inside his limousine. TV sets were only
accessible 15 minutes later at the school.
So, how could he have seen a plane crash into WTC 1 when it wasn’t actually
televised (only the second impact was broadcast)? In addition, on what exact
television set did Bush view this event when, allegedly, none were available
during his commute inside the motorcade? In fact, an amateur video of WTC 1
being hit wasn’t broadcast anywhere until Sept. 12—one day later.
The only reasonable explanation is that U.S. intelligence-manned cameras
were aimed at the twin towers, and the images were subsequently transmitted via
closed-circuit television to Bush and his secret service agents prior to his entrance
into the Booker Elementary School.
The situation gets even more interesting when we examine what took place
following Bush’s departure from the Florida school. It seems that after Air Force
One took-off and was in-flight, a caller phoned the airborne craft and informed
them: “Air Force One is next.”
In Washington, DC Vice President Dick Cheney had taken complete control of
the White House, sending Bush to Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska. While
onboard Air Force One, reports surfaced that a threat had been issued against the
president (“Angel is Next”) while all their security codes had been breached. A
coup had apparently occurred . . . right inside the War Room in our nation’s
capital.
Various reports claimed that callers may have infiltrated the National Security
Agency’s (NSA) state-of-the-art surveillance systems and obtained their secret
codes. According to the Debka Intelligence Files, “They seemed to have at their
disposal an electronic capability that was more sophisticated than that of the
NSA.” As mentioned, Cheney notified the president that infiltrators had used his
top-secret code name—Angel One—thus showing the sophistication and inside
knowledge of their operation.
An elementary question must be asked: who had the capacity to penetrate the
NSA’s most impenetrable security systems: 19 ragtag Afghani cave dwellers, or
the Mossad?
David Frum (Jewish): As Bush speechwriter at the time of 9-11, he projected
the White House stance that Israel was America’s greatest ally in the Middle East,
and they would be our most valuable ‘partner’ in the global war against terrorism.
He also coined the ‘Axis of Evil’ label. In addition, Frum’s cadre of speechwriters
inflated the number of Israelis who died in the WTC collapse to 130. In actuality,
no more than 3 Jews—and quite possibly only 1—perished in the WTC collapse at
Ground Zero that morning.
THE 9-11 COMMISSION COVER-UP

Executing a false-flag attack is only one element of a successful terrorist plot.
The second part of this equation revolves around covering-up the identity of the
criminals and their activities. Conspiracy researchers denounced the Warren
Report after John F. Kennedy’s assassination as the greatest travesty of justice this
country had ever seen. That verdict remained until the 9-11 Commission (and the
many tentacles extending from it) proved even ghastlier.
Alvin K. Hellerstein (Jewish): A fervent Zionist and Israeli nationalist who
belonged to numerous NYC Jewish groups, Hellerstein’s links to Jewish Mafia
figures date back to the mid-1950s. As a judge for the U.S. District Court in
southern New York, he oversaw numerous influential 9-11 cases that related to the
airlines, airport security provided by ICTS (a Jewish-owned firm), and WTC
owner Larry Silverstein.
In addition, he presided over cases for the few families that refused to accept
the government’s Victim Compensation blood money. Hellerstein ultimately
interjected himself into this situation by obstructing justice and eliminating the
threat of investigation for any relatives that balked at being bought off and/or
silenced. He also launched a furious attack against courageous 9-11 widow Ellen
Mariani. After being railroaded, Mariani commented, “This bastard judicial
system is so corrupt.”
Kenneth Feinberg (Jewish): Feinberg spearheaded the 9-11 Victim
Compensation Fund. This dastardly scheme effectively corralled 97 percent of the
families whose relatives died on the morning of Sept. 11. By receiving billions in
taxpayer money, family members were thwarted from engaging in any future
lawsuits against the government, airlines or security agencies.
Along with Judge Hellerstein, they unleashed a torturous war of vengeance
against those who refused to be silenced. In the end, due to obstruction and
coerced out-of-court settlements, not a single 9-11 case has ever effectively
reached trial with a victorious outcome.
Diane ‘Dede’ Feinberg (Jewish): The wife of Kenneth Feinberg and cochairwoman
of the Jewish Federation. At one event hosted by the Feinbergs, both
Benjamin Netanyahu and Def. Min. Ehud Barak were in attendance. Mrs.
Feinberg is also an executive member of the United Jewish Appeal, and sits on the
board of governors for the Jewish Agency, which harbors close affiliations with
the Mossad.
Michael Chertoff (Jewish): A Talmud-teaching rabbi’s son, dual IsraeliAmerican
citizen and Zionist supremacist, Chertoff’s position in the Justice Dept’s
Criminal Division allowed him to lobby (and ultimately release) over 100
members of Israel’s extensive spy ring that engaged in espionage against the U.S.
He is also reported to be the man who first compiled the infamous list of ‘19 Arab
hijackers’ shortly following the 9-11 attacks. Chertoff likewise played a pivotal
role in shuttling the arrested Dancing Israelis back to their home country, thus
avoiding prosecution in an American courtroom. His wife, Meryl, was employed
as a regional director for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Chertoff later
became Sec. of Homeland Security (DHS) and co-authored the Patriot Act.
Alan Dershowitz (Jewish): ABC News reported that this high-profile attorney
negotiated for the release of the Dancing Israelis by acting as a conduit between
the U.S. government and Israeli officials.
Michael Mukasey (Jewish): This Orthodox Jewish judge gained notoriety by
overseeing litigation between WTC owner Larry Silverstein and the insurance
companies that would eventually be forced to pay him billions in compensation.
Mukasey also thwarted any inquiry into the arrests of the Dancing Israelis. He
went on to defend Pres. Bush’s CIA torture policies.
Sheila Birnbaum (Jewish): After only 3 percent of the 9-11 victim families
refused to accept Kenneth Feinberg’s compensation fund hush money, Ms.
Birnbaum was appointed as a ‘special mediator’ to harass, intimidate and strongarm
the individuals who wanted their cases heard in court.
Philip Zelikow (Jewish): Dual Israeli-American citizen, his appointment as
executive director of the 9-11 Commission allowed him to become the primary
gatekeeper who determined what information would—and more importantly,
would not—reach fellow members. This committee’s blatantly corrupt final report
was largely the creation of Zelikow, who promoted the myth that 19 Muslim
extremists, under the guidance of Osama bin Laden, ‘hijacked’ 4 airliners with
nothing more than box cutters. Then, after crashing 2 airliners into the WTC twin
towers, these structures defied every known law of science and collapsed into their
own footprints within 10 seconds. Zelikow also maintained close relationships
with Condi Rice and Karl Rove.
Zelikow had already composed an extensive, detailed prototype of the 9-11
Commission’s final report months before the cover-up artists ever convened. His
pre-work was so intricate that it contained chapters, headings and sub-headings.
Henry Kissinger (Jewish): Originally selected by Pres. George W. Bush to be
executive director of the 9-11 Commission. Conflicts of interest prevented this
career criminal from assuming the post.
Stephen Cauffman (Jewish): As the program manager for NIST (National
Institute of Standards and Technology), he helped cover-up the controlled
demolition of WTC 7. He claimed that fires destroyed this 47-story steel-framed
structure, even though office fires inside the Salomon Building could barely be
seen at street level.
Paul Mlakar & Mete Sozen (both Jewish): Integral members of ASCE’s
(American Society of Civil Engineers) investigative squad that covered-up the
controlled demolitions of WTC 1 and WTC 2. They also performed this same
function in 1995 by concealing how explosives planted in the Alfred P. Murrah’s
basement destroyed that federal building, not an ANFO bomb in Timothy
McVeigh’s Ryder truck.
Alan D. Ratner (Jewish): Metals Management—the company that Ratner
owned, along with the SIMS Group—were given the task of removing evidence
from Ground Zero after the twin towers were demolished. Of course, every steel
beam and girder were crucial elements of the most vital crime scene in America,
yet investigators would never be allowed to inspect the vast majority of these
remains. Ratner exported tons of steel to China, receiving his 6 pieces of silver as
payment for committing treason against his country.
Benjamin Chertoff (Jewish): To combat growing skepticism over the
government’s convoluted ‘official’ explanation of events on 9-11 (i.e. the silliest
of all conspiracy theories), Jim Meigs, editor of Popular Mechanics, appointed
Ben Chertoff to write one of the most explosive and audacious pieces of
propaganda ever conceived. These Popular Mechanics articles were so easily
debunked that anyone with an eighth graders knowledge of physics could easily
pick them apart. It has yet to be definitively proven whether he is the cousin of
former DHS Sec. Michael Chertoff.
Cass Sunstein (Jewish): During a Sept. 15, 2010 interview, Tod Fletcher, a
research assistant for Prof. David Ray Griffin’s book Cognitive Infiltration, told
this writer, “In a 2008 paper [for the Journal of Political Philosophy entitled
Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures], Sunstein called for a secret government
operation that would breakup groups of ‘hardcore extremists’ who supply antigovernment
conspiracy theories.”
He continued, “Because Sunstein believes that these people, many of them 9-
11 truthers, exist in a realm of ‘informational isolation’ and are ‘crippled
epistemologically,’ they’re more likely to become violent, dangerous, and engage
in forms of terrorism. Thus, federal agents should be allowed to directly
undermine their ranks and regulate the Internet.”
In the 100+ years that steel-framed buildings have been erected, only 3 have
ever fallen due to—supposedly—fire. Oddly, all 3 structures were leased by the
same man (Larry Silverstein), they all fell on the same day (Sept. 11, 2001), in the
same fashion (controlled demolitions), all at freefall speed.
ISRAELI SPY RINGS
Prior to Sept. 11, 2001, 140 Israeli nationals were apprehended as part of a
massive investigation into an espionage ring that was operating in our country. It’s
obvious that all of these clandestine operations were not happening by chance.
They needed a driving force behind them. According to an article in the Sunday
Herald by investigator Neil Mackay, “Government documents refer to the spy ring
as an organized intel-gathering operation designed to penetrate government
facilities. Most of those arrested had served in the Israeli armed forces—but
military service is compulsory in Israel. Nevertheless, a number had an
intelligence background.”
Following the 9-11 attacks, 60 more Israelis were detained, and in Carl
Cameron’s highly-touted report for Fox News, his sources revealed that there were
‘tie-ins’ between these Israelis and Sept. 11, and that, “Evidence linking these
Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about the evidence that has been
gathered. Its classified information.”
The FBI and DEA were so alarmed by these developments that in the early part
of 2001 they issued an alert to other government agencies telling them to be on the
lookout for individuals purporting to be “Israeli art students.” These reports also
stated that the suspects were focusing their energies on military bases and other
federal buildings, as well as the FBI itself and the residences of American
intelligence operatives and those in law enforcement.
3 months after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Fox News planned on running a 4-
part series on widespread Israeli spy rings that were operating within the United
States. Carl Cameron compiled this report that exposed the largest spy ring to
ever exist within this nation. Considering what had happened in New York City
and Washington, DC earlier that fall, one would assume that the American
public would have an immense interest in this subject. Yet, for some
inexplicable reason, Fox pulled the story after it had already been researched,
filmed, edited and produced (needless to say, quite a daunting task).
Ruppert Murdoch (staunch Zionist): The biggest question is: who had
enough sway over Ruppert Murdoch to get this explosive story pulled before it
aired?
A clue may be found in Carl Cameron’s unaired report, which documented
how 60+ Israeli nationals were arrested or detained immediately following the 9-
11 attacks, while 140 more had been incarcerated prior to 9-11. The
investigation that eventually nabbed these individuals dealt with a very heady
subject: Israeli espionage within the United States.
Some people may balk at this highly volatile assertion, stating that the
Mossad had tipped-off U.S. officials prior to 9-11 about the possibility of a
domestic strike. But as Cameron pointed out, much of their data was either not
shared with our intelligence, or it was of a “non-specific and general” nature.
Even more damning is the fact that Israeli spies had been following and
compiling dossiers on certain Arabs for months after they had entered this
country, and knew precisely what they were doing in regard to their travels.
These Arab citizens would later be ‘named’ as the 9-11 terrorists. Were these
men actually involved in the attacks, or were they simply identified, trailed, and
later fingered as the fall guys?
Before dismissing this scenario, consider that Cameron’s investigation
pointed-out that the Israeli spies who entered our country were from the Univ. of
Jerusalem and Bazola Academy and were posing as art students. They also had
repeated contact with various government personnel. Cameron had access to
high-level government documents stating that Israelis were targeting and
penetrating U.S. military bases, the DEA, FBI, along with other government
facilities and secret offices. In addition, they were also focusing on the private
homes of law enforcement officials and intelligence personnel. To make this
situation even stickier, these ‘art students’ had served in Israel’s military
intelligence, specializing in electronic surveillance and explosives.
This story has been verified in a 60-page report filed by the DEA and other
government agencies, and has also been confirmed by DEA spokesman William
Glaspy. The Israeli spies in question focused not only on the above-mentioned
areas of our government, but instillations such as MacDill Air Force Base and
Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City were warned to be on the lookout for
potential Israeli spies posing as ‘art students.’
The underlying foundation for Israel’s spy operations in the U.S. can be
found in a defense intelligence report cited by Carl Cameron which states that
Israel has “a voracious appetite for information” and that they are “motivated by
strong survival instincts which dictate every possible facet of their political and
economic policies. It [Israel] aggressively collects military and industrial
technology and the United States is a high priority target.”
One of the many avenues available to the Mossad in regard to data collection
is the Israeli-based private telecommunications company Amdocs Limited,
which handled all of the call records and billing for the 25 largest American
phone companies. In other words, virtually every telecom record in our country
was routed through Amdocs. What precisely does this mean? In simplest terms,
this company had access to almost any phone call that was placed within the
U.S. This situation is so precarious that the NSA—one of our nation’s most
secretive agencies—issued a report warning that American calls were falling into
foreign hands.
If we look back at the months preceding Sept. 11, 2001 when dozens of
potential Arab ‘terrorists’ were entering this country and making scores of
telephone calls, who were the parties listening to them? Answer number 1:
Israel’s Amdocs, Ltd. Plus, who was tracking these Arabs as they entered and
moved around our country? Answer number 2: the Mossad via their ‘art student’
cutouts. In this light, who do you think would have a better opportunity to create
a scapegoat-scenario than the Israelis, especially when we consider that the
United States had now been dragged into a war against one of their greatest
threats—Saddam Hussein’s Iraq? On top of that, America’s foreign policy is
almost exclusively run by the Zionist-oriented neo-cons, while our CIA and
Mossad have been in bed together for decades.
Further, if you don’t think that Amdocs could be compromised, consider the
widespread drug investigation that took place in Los Angeles, 1997. As Carl
Cameron reported, the feds were looking into a vast Israeli organized crime
syndicate operating out of New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Las Vegas, Canada
and Egypt. What our law enforcement officials were finding, though, was that
the Israeli criminals they were tracking had the beeper numbers, cell phone
numbers, and home numbers of the cops who had them under surveillance. Plus,
they admitted to having hundreds more.
Jane’s Information Group, a highly respected UK publication that analyzes
global intelligence and the defense industry, reported on Mar. 13, 2002: “It is
rather strange that the U.S. media with one noticeable exception seem to be
ignoring what may well prove to be the most explosive story since the Sept. 11
attacks, the alleged breakup of a major Israeli espionage operation in the United
States which aimed to infiltrate both the Justice and Defense Departments.”
In a 1996 report, the General Accounting Office (GAO) revealed, “According
to a U.S. intelligence agency, the government of Israel conducts the most
aggressive espionage operation against the U.S. of any U.S. ally.”
A 1996 Defense Intelligence Report likewise stated, “Israel aggressively
collects military and industrial technology and the U.S. is a high priority target.”
David Steinmann (Jewish): The organization responsible for suppressing, and
ultimately taking this story off the Fox News website, was JINSA (Jewish Institute
for National Security Affairs). Their president and CEO was David Steinmann,
who also acted as director of CAMERA (Committee for Accurate Middle East
Reporting in America). These groups mobilized their members to make phone
calls, send faxes, write letters, and e-mail Fox News to cancel any mention of the
Israeli spy rings.
When commenting on how his expose was killed (Dec. 13, 2001), Cameron
stated matter-of-factly: “Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told
Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying is considered career
suicide.”
John F. Sugg of Tampa’s Weekly Planet confirmed this sentiment in an Apr.
22, 2002 article entitled Israeli Spies Exposed: “Fox confirms there was intense
pressure on the network by pro-Israeli lobbying groups such as the AntiDefamation
League and the misnamed Committee for Accuracy in Middle East
Reporting (CAMERA).”
MUSLIM ‘PATSIES’
Of all the CCTV videos at each of the 3 originating airports used on 9-11, not a
single frame clearly depicts any of the alleged 19 ‘hijackers’ who supposedly
overtook 4 airliners. The government claims that one of the videos does show a
suspected terrorist, but the pictures are too blurry to make a positive identification.
The public was further told that all of these 19 men boarded various airliners
used on 9-11, but not a single Arab name appeared on any of the flight manifests.
To bolster this point, at the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in Alexandria, Va. the FBI
never presented a single stitch of evidence proving that these ‘hijacker’ names
appeared on the passenger manifests.
Even more curious, FBI Dir. Robert Mueller explained away this discrepancy
by claiming that the ‘hijackers’ may have used aliases. If they had concealed their
identities, how was the government so readily able to identify them . . . literally
within days by Sept. 14?
Moreover, within hours of the 9-11 terror strikes, why did FBI agents scour the
houses and flight schools used by the ‘19 hijackers’ if they had not even been
identified until Sept. 14?
What follows is a list of preposterous events leading up to the identification of
these 19 individuals:
• Government officials said they located one hijacker because he used an ATM
machine in Portland, Me. However, there are hundreds of thousands of these
money machines in the U.S. How could the feds pinpoint his specific ATM within
hours even though at that time they didn’t even know who the ‘hijackers’ were?
• Mohamed Atta’s travel bag and passport were conveniently ‘left behind’ at
the Boston Airport.
• Although officials justified the lack of airplane wreckage in Shanksville, Pa.
by claiming that it had ‘liquified’ into the ground, they were miraculously able to
locate the passport of Ziad Jarrah despite little, if any, other remains.
• Similarly, military spokesmen explained the lack of airplane wreckage at the
Pentagon by saying that Flight 77 mysteriously ‘vaporized’ into this structure.
However, if the intense heat was able to melt high-grade steel and aluminum, how
were they able to conveniently find in an undisclosed pile of rubble the student ID
of ‘hijacker’ Majed Moqed?
• Finally, to complete this scenario, a NYC police chief somehow tripped upon
the passport of ‘hijacker’ Satam al-Suqami pristinely sitting atop a pile of debris at
Ground Zero.
Even stranger, the public was told that hijackers stormed the cockpit of Flight
93 and overtook the pilots. Yet, these pilots never once entered hijack codes into
their transponders—a procedure that only takes 2 seconds to perform.
Investigators later determined that no evidence existed that ‘hijackers’ ever
broached the cockpit of Flight 93.
Further, the ‘terrorists’ in question ranged in size from 5’5” to 5’7”. In other
words, they were small and scrawny. Plus, they were only armed with box cutters
and possibly a few knives.
Conversely, many of the pilots and co-pilots in the 4 ‘hijacked’ jets were exVietnam
vets, boxers, weightlifters and former military men. In addition, there
were dozens of passengers on each flight that could have undoubtedly thwarted
these ill-equipped, slight men.
The entire story is so fishy that it’s hardly believable, especially when
considering the research of Prof. David Ray Griffin. He asserts in The New Pearl
Harbor that 6 of the purported 19 hijackers were still alive in the days following
9-11:
• Waleed al-Shehri
• Ahmed al-Nami
• Saeed al-Ghamdi
• Mohand al-Shehri
• Salem al-Hazmi
• Abdulaziz al-Oman
On Sept. 25, 2001 Mohamed Atta’s father insisted that on Sept. 12, 2001—one
day after 9-11—his son phoned him to dispute announcements that it was he who
was pictured in an airport security video from Portland, Me. He added that Atta
despised Osama bin Laden, while it was his personal opinion that the Mossad and
Christian Zionists were the ones who actually executed the 9-11 attacks.
Another interesting anecdotal story revolves around Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
(KSM) who allegedly claimed during an interrogation session that he didn’t
‘command’ the ‘hijackers’ to attack Westchester County, New York’s Indian Point
nuclear power plant because “it was probably guarded and we’d get shot down.”
So, instead, they selected the Pentagon because, after all, why would the world’s
most heavily guarded military installation have weapons on hand or anti-aircraft
capabilities to shoot down a kamikaze airliner? The entire premise is absolutely
absurd.
Another point must be brought into the equation. What part did Israeli
intelligence or military operatives play in creating a ‘legend’ or paper trail around
the mythical 19 ‘terrorists’ that would ultimately be used to turn them into Lee
Harvey Oswald fall guys?
Had these Israeli operatives been trailing the Muslims for an extended period
of time prior to 9-11? A DEA report characterized the Israeli spies as being part of
an “organized intelligence gathering activity.”
Incredibly, these Mossad agents were residing in the exact same Hollywood,
Fla. neighborhoods as the Muslims.
This infamous Israeli spy ring that operated in America from the late 1990’s to
mid-2001 (and beyond) had as one of its primary functions the trailing of 19 preselected
‘Arab terrorists’ who would eventually take the fall for 9-11. These Israeli
operatives focused most of their attention on the state of Florida for one primary
reason: that’s where the majority of ‘terrorists’ resided (10 of the 19). In fact, on
Apr. 22, 2002 John F. Sugg of Tampa’s Weekly Planet reported in the
aforementioned article Israeli Spies Exposed that Mohamed Atta’s address was:
3389 Sheridan Street
Hollywood, Florida
Oddly enough, a group of Israeli spies resided at:
4220 Sheridan Street
Hollywood, Florida
Could the closeness of their locales be a mere coincidence? Think again,
because Israeli spies also mirrored the activities of other Arab patsies in Florida,
San Diego, Arizona, Minnesota, Arkansas and Texas.
The FBI confirmed this data, citing that Israeli spies and the Arabs they trailed
lived in inordinately close proximity to each other in Irving, Tx, Miami, and
Hollywood, Fla. from Dec. 2000 to Apr. 2001.
Jack Abramoff (Jewish): According to Daniel Hopsicker of Mad Cow News,
less than a week before the 9-11 attacks, a number of the mythical ‘hijackers’
embarked upon a cruise off the coast of Florida. Jack Abramoff, the famous
criminal lobbyist who later faced a sentence of 5 years in prison, owned the Sun
Cruz Casino boat they used.
Hopsicker’s work on the deliberate recruitment of Muslim ‘terrorists’ into
America is invaluable. Even though he still clings to the misguided notion that
these individuals were the actual hijackers on 9-11, his book Welcome to
Terrorland is a phenomenal account of how the mythical 19 were put in place to
eventually become patsies.
What follows is an encapsulation of Hopsicker’s book. When Mohamed Atta
originally moved to Venice, Fla. he resided with an employee of Huffman
Aviation, which was owned by a man named Rudi Dekker.
Dekker later had a warrant out for his arrest that emanated from the DEA and
U.S. Customs. The charge: smuggling. He also stated that the U.S. government
was partly responsible for the flood of Arab students into the U.S. for training at
flight schools.
Although Dekkers perennially failed in his business endeavors, he still
occupied a $2.5 million mansion. Dekker also had close ties with a man named
Rusty Hilliard. Interestingly, 3 weeks after Atta began his flying lessons at
Huffman Aviation, a Lear jet leased to Hilliard was seized on July 6, 2000 by the
feds. They discovered 43 pounds of heroin inside. The owner of this aircraft was
Huffman Aviation. Locals in Venice, Fla. made it clear that Dekker and Hilliard’s
drug-related operations received a green light from the DEA and Venice Airport.
Hopsicker notes that Mohamed Atta was a huge cocaine user who purchased
his drugs from a Fla. flight-training center in Venice that was owned by Rudy
Dekker’s colleague, Arne Kruithuf. Further, Atta met with Dekkers in Aug.
2001—only one month before 9-11—even though Dekkers intentionally misled
Congress by saying that he never saw Atta after Dec. 2000.
Another revelation in Welcome to Terrorland is that Rusty Hilliard purchased
his heroin-packed Lear jet from the same operatives that supplied it to Barry Seal,
the largest drug transporter in U.S. history.
This point is crucial because after he left Dekkers Flight School, Atta trained at
a Charlotte County, Fla. airport co-owned by Dietrich Reinhardt, who
coincidentally did business with Dekkers and Huffman Aviation, located only
half-an-hour away. A co-partner at this airport was a CIA propriety called Caribe
Air. Reinhardt was also a close associate of Barry Seal.
So, after Dekker shuffled Atta down the road to Reinhardt, 23 helicopters
disappeared from the county sheriff’s office at the precise time that Atta trained
there.
Another peculiar twist enters the picture. Reinhardt delivered missiles to Iran
as a part of the George Bush, Sr.-engineered scheme known as the October
Surprise. Intriguingly, in this author’s book, Hillary (and Bill): the Drug Volume,
a man known as the Arkansas kingpin—Jackson Stephens—played a key role in
the BCCI scandal, Mena drug trafficking, and Iran-Contra.
Drug transporter Barry Seal fingered Stephens—“the old man”—as the
primary figure behind the importation of cocaine into Mena, Ark. Stranger yet,
many of the guns and drugs that were ferried between the Contras and the U.S.
were facilitated through Venice, Fla. Jackson Stephens and the Boone Law Firm
maintained a major presence in Venice, with many saying they ran the town.
In addition to narcotics and weaponry, Venice also served as the U.S. portal
through which the eventual 9-11 ‘terrorists’ gained entry into America. Hopsicker
writes that Osama bin Laden’s brother, Yeslam, sent Muslim students from
Geneva to flight training schools in Venice.
Hopsicker quoted an anonymous Huffman executive who told him, “I thought
these guys (Atta) were double agents . . . I gleaned early on that the operation I
was working for had government protection. They (Atta and company) were let
into this country. How did the FBI get here so soon?”
He added, “We heard that 16 of the 19 terrorists had been on Interpol’s most
wanted list. They were let into this country for a specific reason. It was a business
deal.”
This executive’s suspicions were well founded because, even though the 19
‘hijackers’ weren’t publicly identified until Sept. 14, on the afternoon of 9-11 FBI
agents were already snooping around Rudi Dekker’s Huffman Aviation for
evidence.
The Washington Post weighed in on Sept. 23, 2001. “The FBI knew terrorists
were using U.S. flight schools.” They continued, “The FBI had been aware that 4
or 5 groups linked to Osama bin Laden had operated in the United States, and
knew for years that suspected terrorists with ties to Osama bin Laden were
receiving flight training at schools in the United States.”
Hopsicker lays a trump card with the following information. 7 ‘hijackers’ came
to the U.S. by invitation of the U.S. government and received training at American
military institutions. 3 of these men actually carried identification cards issued by
either Pensacola’s Naval Air Station or Lackland Air Force Base. On the other
hand, Mohamed Atta was a graduate of the U.S. International Officer’s School
located at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama. It’s also reported that while
residing in Hamburg, Germany Atta received subsidy payments from the
“Congress-Bundestag Program”—a joint venture funded by U.S. taxpayers.
Hopsicker ups the ante another level by theorizing that in Oct. 1994 the
Taliban took over Afghanistan’s opium empire, with Osama bin Laden controlling
the trade. The CIA then transported heroin into the U.S. via Venice, Fla.
Hopsicker concludes that 9-11—at least in part—was a heroin war between the
CIA and Taliban to ultimately seize control of this multi-billion dollar industry.
Then, in the days after 9-11, Hopsicker addresses the controversial issue of
how certain bin Laden family members were scurried out of the U.S. According to
Welcome to Terrorland, the CIA facilitated this move by using Lear jets owned by
Wally Hilliard, the financier behind Huffman Aviation.
On Sept. 4, 2003 World Net Daily announced, “Within a week of the
‘hijackings,’ private planes picked up individuals from 10 cities, including Los
Angeles, Washington, Houston and Boston . . . The Boston Globe reported at the
time that 2 flights were bound for Saudi Arabia with members of the bin Laden
clan on board.”
On Sept. 30, 2001 the New York Times wrote, “Saudi Arabia supervised the
urgent evacuation of 24 members of Osama bin Laden’s extended family from the
United States in the first days after the terror attacks on New York and
Washington.”
In all, 10 flights—between Sept. 13 and Sept. 24—escorted 300 people out of
the U.S., many of them Saudis or close associates and family members of Osama
bin Laden. None of these passengers were subjected to thorough investigations
even though the government hadn’t yet fully lifted its ban on flight restrictions for
the general public.
Two other side notes: when Pres. George W. Bush read a story about goats to
children at the Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, he was located less than 20
miles away from Rudi Dekker’s flight school—Huffman Aviation—in Venice,
Fla.
Secondly, this quote from Zacarias Moussaoui is quite eye opening. “It is
beyond reasonable doubt that the FBI was facilitating the movement of the 19
hijackers in and out of the country.”
Once these ‘terrorists’ were established here in the U.S., Israeli ‘art students’
then began trailing their every move, creating a ‘legend’ that would later be used
against them after the 9-11 attacks.
Ephraim Halevy (Jewish): Mossad chief who dispatched Israeli spies to
create a ‘legend’ or profile for the 19 Arabs who would later be identified as ‘9-11
hijackers’.
Mossad Ran 9-11 Arab ‘Hijacker’ Terrorist Operation by Wayne Madsen
(excerpts)
• “British intelligence reported in Feb. 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the
Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9-11
Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and
Pentagon . . . The British intelligence report was suppressed by the government of
then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.”
• “A Mossad unit consisting of 6 Egyptian and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated
‘al Qaeda’ cells in Hamburg (the Atta cell), south Florida and the United Arab
Emirates in the months before 9-11.”
• “The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them
specific orders.”
• “A three-man Mossad unit traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with
Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama bin Laden. In fact, they
were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.”
• “The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9-
11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C.”
• “In mid-August, the Mossad team running the Hamburg cell in Boston
reported to Tel Aviv that the final plans for 9-11 were set. The Florida-based
Mossad cell reported that the documented ‘presence’ of the Arab cell members at
Florida flight schools had been established.”
• “Wayne Madson Reports has learned from a Pentagon source that leading
Americans tied to the media efforts to pin 9-11 on Arab hijackers, Osama bin
Laden and the Taliban were present in the Israeli Embassy on Sept. 10, 2001 to
coordinate their media blitz.”
NEO-CONS
Of course Israeli terrorists could not have carried out the 9-11 attacks without
cooperation from within the U.S. government. When the Israeli Defense Force
(IDF) engaged in a deadly assault on the USS Liberty in 1967, they had already coopted
the services of Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson, Def. Sec. Robert McNamara, and
CIA spook James Jesus Angleton.
Prior to Sept. 11, 2001 the treasonous criminal element within our country that
aided and abetted the Israeli killers congregated under the collective umbrella
known as neo-conservatism (or neo-cons). Below is a dossier dedicated to the
abysmal figures known as Israel Firsters.
Leo Strauss (Jewish): An atheist and guiding light for the neo-cons, Strauss
received a crucial fellowship from the Rockefeller Foundation that began his
career at the Univ. of Chicago. Strauss advocated a Machiavellian-style form of
deception that could be utilized by society’s ruling elite. He felt such tactics were
not problematic if used by governments because their citizenry weren’t capable of
appreciating the ‘truths’ they proposed. Therefore, an “end justifies the means”
philosophy became perfectly acceptable for his sycophantic followers.
As the ex-Trotskyite mentor for his acolytes, Strauss promoted the use of
‘noble lies’ to further their agenda. Biographer Shadia Drury described Strauss as
a ‘new Machiavelli’ and said that he was “a great believer in the efficacy and
usefulness of lies in politics.”
Irving Kristol (Jewish): The modern-day neo-con founding father. Michael
Collins Piper, author of the seminal Final Judgment, depicted him as leading a
“small, mostly Jewish group of New York intellectuals operating in the senior
Kristol’s sphere of influence known to insiders as the Family.”
Adam Shulsky (Jewish): A protégé of Leo Strauss, he directed the Office of
Special Plans (OSP). Shulsky worked under Def. Sec. Donald Rumsfeld as his
primary disinformation agent. Shulsky spent the Cold War era studying Soviet
disinfo techniques. At OSP he reported directly to Paul Wolfowitz, and coauthored
a research paper entitled Leo Strauss and the World of Intelligence that
promoted the idea that “a certain amount of deception is essential in government.”
On May 15, 2003 Al Cronkrite wrote in Judeo-Christian Decadence at the
Fount of Power, “There are several significant characteristics of the Office of
Special Plans. Most importantly, it is primarily Jewish and strongly Zionist. It is
religiously humanistic, but tainted with the Pharisical Jewish notion of superiority.
It is clannish and secretive, and it follows a Jewish pattern of being the power
behind the throne.”
The deadly OSP was directed by Leo Strauss’ protégé Adam Shulsky, and
overseen by Under-Sec. of Def. William Luti. These individuals were central to
implementing the war, for not only were they the ones processing Ahmad
Chalabi’s Iraqi reports, but they also cherry-picked all of the other information
presented to the White House. While manipulating this incoming data, Shulsky
and company ultimately took precedence over every other intelligence agency,
causing the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to quake in fear, while
at the same time declaring that the CIA didn’t have what it took to “get the job
done.”
The Office of Special Plans was so obsessively focused on its goals that retired
Air Force Lieut. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski described this small coterie of men as
such: “It was organized like a machine. The people working on the neo-con
agenda had a narrow, well-defined political agenda. They had a sense of mission”
(The Lie Factory—Mother Jones, Jan. 2003 by Robert Dreyfuss & Jason Vest).
This mission, of course, was war, and the onus to implement it was placed in the
hands of various Israeli First think tanks.
Paul Wolfowitz (Jewish): Deputy Def. Sec. and member of the Defense
Policy Board. Wolfowitz was the dark visionary force behind the Office of Special
Plans, which was otherwise known as “the Cabal.” He later became president of
the World Bank.
Richard “The Prince of Darkness” Perle (Jewish): Perennial Bilderberg
attendee and chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board. In the 1970s, Sen.
Henry Jackson’s office expelled Perle after the NSA caught him passing highly
classified documents to Israel.
On the morning of 9-11, the Defense Policy Board was under the direct
command of Perle. He wielded so much power that in 1986 The Washington Post
quoted a high-ranking State Dept. official as calling him “the most powerful man
in the Pentagon.”
In essence, the U.S. war machine took its marching orders from the Defense
Policy Board, which possessed inordinately more control than an underling such
as Def. Sec. Donald Rumsfeld.
During the 1980s, Britain’s Labor Party Leader Denis Healey referred to Perle
as “the person in charge of World War III.” Plus, Michael Collins Piper wrote in
The High Priests of War, “In 1970, after the National Security Council ordered a
wiretap of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Perle was revealed to be passing
classified information to an officer of the Israeli Embassy.” Last but not least,
Perle—who was appointed as head of the Defense Policy Board by George W.
Bush himself—became very wealthy selling weapons to the Israeli Defense Force
[the most bloodthirsty killers on earth].
In a Dec. 2002 interview, author John Pilger provides a clearer understanding
of Richard Perle’s paranoid, Dr. Strangelove mentality where he advocates
multiple wars in simultaneous theaters of engagement:
“This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them
out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do
Iraq . . . this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the
world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together
clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war . . . our children will sing great songs
about us years from now.”
The Prince of Darkness’s lunatic vision of an imperialistic Israeli war machine
is undeniably scary. In regard to 9-11, only one entity would be in a position to
create such an elaborately deceptive scenario—the Israeli-loyal Defense Policy
Board that was manned at every top-level position by rabid pro-war Zionists that
had no compunction whatsoever to spill blood or sacrifice human lives as
collateral damage. These individuals ultimately controlled the Pentagon’s big
guns.
So, what we have here is the Zionist-aligned Defense Policy Board (the real
power behind the War Machine’s throne) controlling every top spot at the
Pentagon, with PNAC-signatories Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney following
in fully compliant lockstep. Therefore, when we look at the military’s ‘standdown’
on the morning of 9-11, if anybody [like Alex Jones] says that Israel didn’t
control it, they’re absolutely incorrect, for the entire Pentagon think-tank was an
insanely obsessed cabal of Jewish murderers who were calling all the shots. Of
course, LIHOP apologists and incompetence/negligence peddlers will spew their
propaganda to conceal the Jewish angle. However, none of their bait-and-switch
tactics can alter the fact that mastermind Richard Perle, the Defense Policy Board,
and their legion of Zionist crazies carefully orchestrated the NORAD-FAAmilitary
‘stand-down’. Quite simply, the Defense Policy Board wielded much
more power than all of the other law-abiding generals and admirals, and by
creating mass confusion via their war games, or dispatching jet fighters late and/or
in the wrong direction, they were able to pull-off the stand-down.
Members of the Defense Policy Board
• Henry Kissinger (Jewish)
• James Schlessinger (Jewish)
• Eliot Cohen (Jewish)
• Paul Wolfowitz (Jewish)
• Douglas Feith (Jewish)
• Kenneth Adelman (Zionist)
• James Woolsey (Zionist, former CIA Dir.)
• Newt Gingrich (Zionist)
Douglas Feith (Jewish): Donald Rumsfeld appointed Feith to create the OSP,
in addition to the Counter-Terrorism Evaluation Group (CTEG) immediately
following the 9-11 attacks. Feith also coordinated the accumulation of fake
documentation that accused Saddam Hussein of stockpiling Weapons of Mass
Destruction (WMDs), while later overseeing reconstruction of Iraq and the U.S.
invasion. In 1976, the National Security Council dismissed Feith after he was
caught stealing classified documents for Israel.
Ari Shavit (Jewish): A senior correspondent and member of the editorial
board for Haaretz newspaper. In the Apr. 9, 2003 edition of Forward magazine,
he revealed, “The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neo-conservative intellectuals,
most of them Jewish.”
Marc Grossman (Jewish): As Under-Sec. for Political Affairs on Sept. 11, he
clandestinely met with Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad, who led Pakistan’s grossly corrupt
ISI intelligence services. Mahmoud channeled $100,000 to Mohamed Atta in the
summer of 2000.
Rabbi Marvin Hier (Jewish): Founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He
said of Pres. George W. Bush, “I have never heard any American president, from
Reagan to Clinton, ally himself so closely with the Israeli position.”
Natan Sharansky (Jewish): George W. Bush’s in-house intellectual guru.
This frothing Zionist authored a seminal book that served as the driving force
behind Bush’s second inaugural speech, The Case for Democracy.
William Kristol (Jewish): Son of Irving Kristol, this ardent warmonger and
PNAC signatory is the co-editor of the influential Weekly Standard magazine that
set the stage for America’s invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq after the 9-11 attacks.
Other high profile media luminaries that pushed the Muslim terrorist angle were
Charles Krauthammer (Jewish), Norman Podhoretz (Jewish) and Mortimer
Zuckerman (Jewish).
Team B (Jewish): A cadre of war hawks inside the Israeli government that
intensely lobbied U.S. legislators to provide more weaponry and financial aid to
Israel. They’re described as being “almost incestuous” in their fraternal bond and
advancement of a Greater Israel agenda.
Ariel Sharon (Jewish): Israeli Prime Minister at the time of 9-11. The Likud
Party he founded had a great deal of influence over the neo-cons.
Jewish Lobbyist Groups
• AIPAC: American Israeli Political Action Committee. With over 60,000
members, they’re the most powerful foreign policy lobby in Washington, DC.
• AEI: American Enterprise Institute
• JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
• American Jewish Committee
Project for a New American Century: This group called for a ‘New Pearl
Harbor’ (i.e. the 9-11 terrorist attacks) to thrust American into a protracted Middle
East war. Their essential paper on this subject, entitled Rebuilding America’s
Defenses, withheld these crucial lines: “The process of transformation, even if it
brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic
and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Some of its signers included:
• Eliot Abrams – Jewish
• Gary Bauer – Jewish
• Eliot Cohen – Jewish
• Aaron Friedberg – Jewish
• Donald Kagan – Jewish
• William Kristol – Jewish
• David Wurmser – Jewish
• Daniel Pipes – Jewish
• Stephen Bryen – Jewish
• Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby – Jewish
• Norman Podhoretz – Jewish
• Stephen Rosen – Jewish
• Henry Rowen – Jewish
• Paul Wolfowitz – Jewish
• William Bennett – Zionist
• Dick Cheney – Zionist
To insure that a dramatic, highly recognizable villain would play the 9-11
patsy, it became necessary for Osama bin Laden—a bearded 6’5” turban-wearing
Muslim—remain free. So, the Israelis and neo-cons blackmailed Pres. Bill Clinton
with a host of incriminating evidence that they held over his head. In return for the
president not being impeached or imprisoned, his administration protected the
Taliban and al-Qaeda so that a ready-made enemy could be targeted and American
television viewers would be duped in the hours following 9-11.
In the meantime, Mossad spies within the U.S. began creating a ‘legend’
around the eventual ’19 hijackers’ while Clinton’s ‘inept and incompetent’
military neglected to arrest bin Laden on numerous occasions from 1998-2000.
Their bogeyman remained at large.
To further mislead a gullible public away from the true motives behind 9-11—
namely that U.S. military forces would fight Israel’s Muslim enemies for them,
while at the same time paying astronomical amounts of interest to Jewish bankers
via their war efforts—another cover-story had to be disseminated.
Enter charlatans from the political left and a largely fake 9-11 truth movement
to dangle a carrot that 9-11 was Dick Cheney’s war for oil. Even the 2003 Shock
& Awe strike against Saddam Hussein was originally called ‘Operation Iraqi
Liberation’ . . . OIL. Coupled with sensationalized claims of ‘peak oil’ by
individuals inside the 9-11 truth movement like Mike Ruppert, all attention had
once again been shifted away from Israel.
Obviously the securing of strategic oil reserves did play a role in this global
‘clash of civilizations.’ Unocal, for one, led the way in an attempt to obtain land
surrounding the Caspian Sea, and even worked closely with the Taliban at first. In
fact, on Aug. 15, 2001 Taliban leaders traveled to Houston where they met with
Unocal executives to negotiate whether oil pipelines would be built through
Afghanistan. Unocal naturally enjoyed close ties with Dick Cheney’s Halliburton.
However, the Taliban refused their offers, a move that created irreparable amounts
of animosity.
It goes without saying that Cheney had a vested interest in these deals. Thus, in
addition to the infamous PNAC manifesto, another largely overlooked article must
be considered. Entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,
this document emerged as the brainchild of Richard Perle (Jewish) and Benjamin
Netanyahu (Jewish).
Other authors recruited to prepare this report were all neo-cons with long
affiliations to Israel’s Likud Party.
• Douglas Feith – Jewish
• Robert Lowenberg – Jewish
• Jonathan Torop – Jewish
• David Wurmser – Jewish
• Meyrav Wurmser – Jewish
After being presented to Benjamin Netanyahu in July 1996, the main tenets of
the Clean Break document included:
• The removal of Saddam Hussein from power
• Armed incursions into Lebanon and Palestinian areas, in addition to possible
future strikes against Syria and Iran
• A repudiation of ‘land for peace’
To accomplish these goals against their despised Arab neighbors, Israel’s main
intent was to recruit U.S. military might. To avoid a finger of blame directed at
their own nation, Israeli P.R. masters cloaked these war-mongering efforts in the
guise of Pax Americana. As such, the Jewish-controlled corporate media would
focus on ‘American imperialism’ rather than the bloodthirsty aims of a Greater
Israel.
Author James Bamford discussed Clean Break on Aug. 7, 2006. “They’ve had
this goal for years, for a decade, at least. In 1996 they came up with the Clean
Break plan which was an outline for how Israel would basically get rid of Iraq and
Saddam Hussein and move into Syria, Lebanon, and on to Iran.”
In addition to foiling Big Oil’s pipeline deals across Eurasia, the Taliban also
double-crossed the CIA in regard to who controlled Afghanistan’s opium fields.
So, even though none of the mythical 19 ‘terrorists’ actually resided in
Afghanistan, a red herring needed to be established that all of them trained there
under the guidance of CIA-created asset Osama bin Laden.
FBI translator Sibel Edmonds testified for over 3 hours before the 9-11
Commission, clearly stating that drug trafficking and money laundering were
intricately involved in the lead-up to Afghani pre-9-11 matters. Not surprisingly,
none of her revelations were included in their final report.
Being quite possibly the most desolate place on Earth, Afghanistan’s rugged
terrain did provide an ideal locale for the cultivation of opium. After the U.S.
vacated Vietnam and the Golden Triangle in 1975, CIA black-budget operatives
required a new hotspot.
Serendipitously, after Bilderberg luminary and Trilateral Commission
cofounder Zbigniew Brzezinski manipulated the Soviet Union into invading
Afghanistan in 1979, the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI joined forces with a band of
ragtag ‘freedom fighters’ known as the mujahideen. Their leader was Osama bin
Laden, whose relatives had been engaging in business deals with the Bush crime
family since the early 1970s.
To finance their war efforts, the CIA and ISI sanctioned narcotics trafficking
by bin Laden’s rebel troops. According to Prof. Alfred McCoy, academia’s
foremost authority on this subject, the CIA funneled a billion dollars in covert
funds to a major drug kingpin named Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.
Eventually, bin Laden emerged as Afghanistan’s primary drug lord and the
world’s leading exporter of heroin. By the 1990s he had hijacked one of
Afghanistan’s commercial airlines to create a shadow air force that was used to
deliver heroin abroad. In addition, with full complicity from the CIA, these rogue
flights also ferried guns and dirty money during the creation of their criminal
network.
As the Taliban seized control of Kabul and other prime opium cultivation
areas, they—in unison with the CIA and ISI—were reaping billions in profits.
Still, tensions grew between these Islamic extremists, the CIA and U.S. oil barons.
As retaliation, the Taliban announced a ban on all poppy cultivation in 1999. Since
they grew the crops, processed and shipped it, this move severely cut into the
CIA’s black budget resources, causing further rifts in this contentious area.
It became apparent that the CIA and Big Oil could no longer work with the
Taliban, so when the neo-con’s PNAC agenda merged with Israel’s Clean Break
aims, the eventual result became a war against the Muslim world. To set the stage,
Prof. Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations and Brzezinski’s The Grand
Chessboard provided the intellectual blueprint.
Considering that the American public had to believe the 9-11 attacks arose out
of thin air without any foreknowledge by U.S. governmental agencies, an element
of incompetence had to be incorporated into their plans. To augment this much
needed aura of ineptitude, a few ‘whistleblowers’ were permitted to voice their
concerns without any heed being taken by law enforcement agencies.
For instance, FBI agent Coleen Rowley passed reams of information onto her
superiors in regard to potential terrorists. Her reports were continually ignored,
suppressed or rejected because it was imperative to keep a ‘legend’ alive for the
mythical 19. The inflammatory Able Danger documents that specifically named
Mohamed Atta prior to 9-11 also surfaced.
6 weeks before 9-11, attorney David Schippers contacted FBI agents and told
them of impending terror attacks that were to be unleashed against lower
Manhattan. His alarm rose to such urgent levels that Schippers even tried to reach
Atty. Gen. John Ashcraft. All of his calls were ignored even though many FBI
agents knew of the attack rumors.
To cement this notion that the U.S. government merely ‘overlooked’ warning
signs, on Aug. 6, 2001 the CIA issued a memo entitled Bin Laden Determined to
Strike in U.S. Although Pres. Bush was vacationing yet again at his Texas ranch,
aides did notify him of this briefing. Contained in the CIA paper was the following
plea, “Hijacked airliners were intended for use as missiles, and the intended targets
were to be inside the U.S.”
Sec. of State Condi Rice would later lie that the Bush administration had no
idea that airplanes would be used as flying projectiles. Similarly, contrary to
reports issued by FBI agents such as Coleen Rowley who knew something was
awry, on Apr. 30, 2002 FBI Dir. Robert Mueller told this whopper. “In our
investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper that mentioned any
aspect of the Sept. 11 plot.”
On the contrary, Pentagon and State Dept. officials began canceling their flight
plans on commercial airliners due to security concerns in the weeks preceding 9-
11.
By early Sept. 2001 preparatory events had reached a fevered pitch. On Wall
Street, the stock market had tanked over 900 points in the preceding 3 weeks.
Investors prepared for an impending crash.
On Sept. 5 a plethora of Muslim or Arab-related websites—up to 500 of
them—inexplicably crashed. Technology experts blamed the cyber attack on a
U.S. anti-terrorism task force that raided the headquarters of a Texas-based
Internet Service Provider named InfoCom Corp. Without access to the ‘web,
Muslims in-the-know weren’t able to issue any pre-9-11 warnings.
By Sept. 6 bomb-sniffing dogs were unexpectedly removed from their posts at
the World Trade Center towers in New York.
Overseas, a killing spree began. On Sept. 9 Commander Ahmad Shah
Masood—leader of the Northern Alliance—was assassinated. Those on the ground
felt that Pakistani ISI hit men were responsible. The body count mounted when 3
Saudis who had knowledge of the impending 9-11 strikes were slain within 8 days
of one another in the days prior to Sept. 11.
Drumbeats of war resounded throughout the corridors of power in Washington,
DC. On Sept. 4—an entire week before 9-11—the White House approved plans to
invade Afghanistan even though this nation made no threats against the U.S. and
didn’t engage in a preemptive military strike. Pres. Bush was expected to sign this
bill on Sept. 9.
Pakistan’s Foreign Sec. Niaz Naik confirmed this news. He confided to the
BBC that senior American officials told him in mid-July, 2001 that the U.S.
military intended to take action against Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden and the
Taliban by mid-October. Naik heard this chatter prior to Sept. 11, and added that
forces responsible for launching the attack were already in place. On Oct. 7, 2001
the U.S. invaded Afghanistan.
After becoming aware of these plans, British Prime Minister Tony Blair
confided, “To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the
public’s consent to suddenly launch a campaign on Afghanistan but for what
happened on Sept. 11.”
It’s noteworthy that Afghanistan’s puppet president, Hamid Karzai, was a
former Unocal employee and up to his neck in the opium trade.
Then, without further ado, on a sunny Sept. 11 morning in New York City at
8:46 a.m. American Airlines Flight 11 (or a facsimile thereof) barreled into WTC
1. 17 minutes later at 9:03 a.m. WTC 2 suffered the same fate when United
Airlines Flight 175 (or a facsimile thereof) impacted it. This event, complete with
a fantastic fireball erupting from the skyscraper, was broadcast live on nationwide
television. At that moment, the entire world changed.
At 9:37 a.m. an event occurred in Washington, DC at the Pentagon. Despite the
government’s insistence that American Airlines Flight 77 struck out military nerve
center, no evidence whatsoever supports their claim.
At any rate, only miles away, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), Rep. Porter Goss (a
Fla. congressman and future CIA Dir.), Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), and fellow members
of congressional intelligence committees were meeting at the Capital with Lieut.
Gen. Mahmud Ahmad, Pakistan’s Dir. of the ISI (their version of our CIA).
Ahmad not only had close ties to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, but also
authorized a wire transfer of $100,000 to Mohamed Atta, the purported 9-11
mastermind. During Russia’s extended war against Afghanistan, which began in
1979, CIA agents joined with the ISI to funnel money and weapons to the
mujahideen, an outfit ultimately led by Osama bin Laden. Why were U.S. senators
having breakfast with the man who led this nefarious outfit?
Ahmad had been in the U.S. for an entire week prior to 9-11, meeting with his
colleagues at the CIA (including CIA Dir. George Tenet), and military officials at
the Pentagon (including Colin Powell). Later, White House operatives altered the
transcripts of these conferences. The reason is clear: Ahmad’s ISI served as the
Taliban’s prime sponsor, and had the full backing and cooperation of his
counterparts at the CIA.
As America suffered the traumatic blowback and aftershocks of 9-11, CBS
News reported that only 5 hours after Flight 77 allegedly struck the Pentagon, Def.
Sec. Donald Rumsfeld had already assigned aides to begin formulating a plan to
strike Iraq. At that point, no evidence whatsoever had surfaced linking Saddam
Hussein to the 9-11 attacks, nor has any been presented since.
By Sept. 13—only 2 days after 9-11—Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad met behind
closed doors at the State Dept. with Dep. Sec. of State Richard Armitage. In his
position as head of the ISI, Ahmad acted as a liaison between Pentagon generals,
the CIA, and officials in the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
In these ensuing post 9-11 days, Ahmad also met with Sen. Joe Biden (D-De),
then chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, and later vice president
under Barack Obama.
On Oct. 7, 2001 war began. In his book At the Center of the Storm: My Years
at the CIA, George Tenet made a startling revelation. Rather than Donald
Rumsfeld’s Dept. of Def., it was actually his CIA that controlled the Afghani
invasion. One of their first priorities entailed liberating known opium warlords that
had been imprisoned in order for them to start replanting the opium fields that had
been eradicated under the Taliban. By 2003, Afghanistan once again began
producing record-breaking levels of opium, a trend that continued for years into
the future.
Daniel Pearl (Jewish): Conspiracy researchers claim that this reporter’s grisly
2002 beheading occurred because he got too close to uncovering the 9-11 money
trail that preceded the Sept. 11 attacks.
THE FINAL TABOO
As previous chapters have revealed, a Jewish element is present in every single
aspect and at every level of the 9-11 phenomenon. From ownership of the WTC
complex (and the businessmen who arranged it) to security (or lack thereof) at the
twin towers and departure airports, nearly every individual involved was Jewish.
In addition, who can deny the role of Mossad-affiliated Dancing Israelis or a
vast Israeli spy network that lurked within U.S. borders before and after the 9-11
attacks? Inside the White House, Jewish spokesmen spun the government’s
‘official’ version of events, while talking heads in the Jewish-controlled media
worked hand-in-hand to perpetuate an extensive cover-up.
To further this miscarriage of justice, judges, attorneys and the 9-11
Commission teamed with Jewish saboteurs. On the other hand, the neo-cons
existed as an unabashed vehicle for the Israel First cabal, allowing one of the 9-11
masterminds, Dov Zakheim, to play a prominent role in the assault against
America. Rubbing salt into this open wound were Israeli leaders such as Benjamin
Netanyahu, whose heartless remarks reflected the lengths of his inhuman nature.
The preponderance of evidence in regard to Jewish guilt and Israel’s role in the
Sept. 11 attacks is overwhelming, undeniable, and beyond any reasonable doubt.
In light of this evidence, where is the 9-11 truth movement? Their resounding
silence and refusal to pursue these Jewish mass-murderers reinforces the notion
that their ‘movement’ was created prior to the fateful morning of Sept. 11, and
they’ve continued to be infiltrated, subverting legitimate truth-seekers ever since.
Only one issue still remains to be exposed in regard to 9-11: Israel’s central
role in planning, choreographing, and executing these crimes. A failure to make
this priority number one is an ad hoc surrender and perpetuation of deception. Any
9-11 ‘truther’ who fails to expose Israel’s role has, in essence, chosen to protect
the worst killers among us.
PROOF: ASSOCIATED PRESS
FOREKNOWLEDGE—READS FROM 9-11 SCRIPT
Proof that the mainstream media had foreknowledge of 9-11 has now been
definitively verified. On the morning of Sept. 11, at 9:04:15 a.m. Liz Foreman,
web-master of WCPO Channel 9 in Cincinnati, posted an article stating, “Plane
Crashes into Pentagon.”
According to the official government story, Flight 77 purportedly crashed into
the Pentagon, but this staged event did not take place until 9:37 a.m.—a full 33
minutes after Ms. Foreman made her post.
Anyone who has studied the 9-11 Pentagon case quickly realizes that from all
available evidence, there is no possible way that a 757 commercial airliner
weighing over 250,000 pounds could have fit into a 16-foot-hole without leaving
any visible wreckage. Nor was supposed hijacker Hani Hanjour—who could
barely drive an automobile—capable of executing the highly complex Top Gun
maneuvers that the government said he did.
Still, how could Liz Foreman have known about this event 33 minutes prior to
it actually happening? On Aug. 4, 2008 this writer phoned her at The Cincinnati
Inquirer, and she readily admitted making the above post at 9:04 a.m. When
further questioned about how she obtained this information, Ms. Foreman
explained that the Associated Press fed this story through the news wire,
whereupon she posted it on the WCPO website. She has also publicly responded to
this point in print, saying that she is not going to fall on the sword for the AP
simply because she posted a press release that they originally ran.
Also included in this same 9:04 a.m. article was further proof that the AP was
operating from a predetermined script. “The Federal Aviation Administration has
shut down all aircraft takeoffs nationwide.” Again, this event did occur, but not
until 9:26 a.m.—22 minutes later than when the AP ran their story.
Not so coincidentally, the AP wasn’t alone in their foreknowledge of 9-11. The
transcript of a BBC broadcast at 4:57 p.m. reads, “The Solomon Brothers Building
in New York (WTC 7), right in the heart of Manhattan, has also collapsed.” Even
earlier, at 4:14 p.m., Aaron Brown of CNN reported, “One of the other buildings,
Building 7, in the World Trade Center complex is on fire and has either collapsed
or is collapsing.” As everyone knows, WTC 7—which was not struck by any
airliners and had only one miniscule fire burning on the twelfth floor—did
collapse via a pre-planned controlled demolition, but the time was 5:20 p.m.—
much later than when the BBC and CNN made their initial reports.
The importance of these revelations relating to the Pentagon attack confirms
information contained in Phantom Flight 93 that the masterminds plotting 9-11
didn’t foresee that when Flight 93’s takeoff from Newark was delayed 41 minutes,
it would foil the precision of their original plan. Subsequently, since a script had
already been written and fed to major news outlets, some—such as the AP—
weren’t notified that their scheme was unraveling, and thus they prematurely
announced that the Pentagon had been struck 33 minutes before any such event
took place.
CENSORED! ISRAEL’S ROLE IN 9-11 ATTACKS
Clear Channel is America’s largest radio conglomerate, and apparently they
don’t want anyone knowing about Israel’s central role in the 9-11 terrorist attacks,
and as such they’ve taken great efforts to insure that this information is
suppressed. What follows is a firsthand account of how high-level censorship
works in this country.
On the fifth anniversary of 9-11, Lisa Guliani and I were invited to appear as
guests on George Noory’s Coast-to-Coast AM radio show (which is owned by
Clear Channel). Noory had originally scheduled us to speak about our activism at
Ground Zero and other venues, but instead during this half-hour slot a historic
event took place. For the first time ever on nationwide radio, the subject of Israel’s
involvement in 9-11 was discussed.
What made this evening even more remarkable was that Coast-to-Coast is
simulcast on over 500 radio stations across the country. So, approximately 8
million listeners worldwide were exposed to the most dangerous and taboo subject
in the field of 9-11 research—Israel’s key role in the attacks on America. 2 days
later, we posted a link to this show (from an independent source) on our WING
TV website, thus making this information available to an even larger audience.
That’s when our troubles began. On Nov. 21, 2006 we received a letter from
Alissa K. Fanning—Corporate Counsel for Clear Channel—informing us that we
must immediately remove the link to our appearance on Noory’s radio show. The
main reason provided for their action was “infringement of intellectual property.”
Their rationale seemed flimsy, however, since dozens of other websites also post
clips from Coast-to-Coast AM.
Over the next few days, I subsequently spoke with Ellen Lockwood, who
represented Ms. Fanning, and tried to work out a solution to this problem. After
being told that we didn’t have copyright permission to offer Clear Channel
programming, I asked if there was some sort of arrangement we could reach.
Ms. Lockweed informed me that Clear Channel has allowed others in the past
to establish a franchise agreement to offer Clear Channel programming, so I told
her we would be willing to enter into such an arrangement. Regrettably, I received
a phone call the next day informing me that Clear Channel would absolutely not
allow me to pay for the right to link to a show that we were invited onto by George
Noory himself, even though we were deriving no monetary gain from the link, and
there was nothing slanderous said against Clear Channel or Coast-to-Coast AM. In
essence, we were offering to give money to a multi-million dollar corporation for
the right to host a single half-hour broadcast, and they flat-out refused.
Furthermore, Ms. Lockwood explained that if we did not immediately remove
this link, she would not only contact our server and attempt to have our WING TV
site taken off the Internet, but there would be legal action taken on Clear
Channel’s behalf against us in the future.
One must wonder: what had we discussed that made Clear Channel take such
extreme measures? For starters, we spoke about a number of points contained in
my book 9-11 Evil, such as the Dancing Israelis, how the first suspects arrested
after 9-11 were Israelis, Michael Chertoff’s duel Israeli/American citizenship,
Urban Moving System’s role as a front for the Mossad, and WTC owner Larry
Silverstein’s links to Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu.
In addition, there were 2 other revelations never before made public on
American radio. First, Ehud Sprinzak, a terrorist expert at Hebrew Univ. in
Jerusalem, said that from Israel’s perspective, 9-11 was the most important public
relations act ever committed in their favor. Secondly, a man named Ami Ayalon,
head of the Israeli military, disclosed that since Sept. 11, their leaders have been
euphoric. Now ask yourself: how many other people anywhere on the globe were
ecstatic about 9-11? Only the Israelis, because this joint neo-con/Mossad terrorist
event laid the framework for our current war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and potentially
Iran.
Both of the above statements coincide with Prime Min. Benjamin Netanyahu’s
disgraceful sentiments. When asked by the New York Times what 9-11 meant for
U.S.-Israeli relations, he replied, “It’s very good. Well, not very good, but it will
generate immediate sympathy.”
PENTAGON ANOMALIES CONTRADICT
OFFICIAL TIMELINE
Was the Pentagon ‘attacked’ on 9-11 at 9:37 a.m. as the government says, or
did another major event occur at 9:31 a.m.—6 minutes earlier—which they’re
trying to cover up? Official sources have placed a great deal of emphasis on their
timeline, but a few glaring inconsistencies exist.
At 9:31:39 a.m. explosions rocked the west wing which caused a calibrated
Navy clock inside the Pentagon, as well as a standard-issue battery operated clock
outside the Heliport, to be knocked from their respective walls and stop. This
occurred 6 entire minutes prior to the crucial time of 9:37 a.m..
Meanwhile, 2 firefighters positioned near the Heliport—Alan Wallace and
Mark Skipper—described seeing a large commercial airliner soaring toward them
25-feet off the ground. The time was 9:31 a.m. It should be noted that neither
Wallace nor Skipper actually saw anything hit the Pentagon because the deafening
roar of the engines was so loud that they ran and ducked for cover, fearing for
their lives. Seconds later they heard a loud explosion, which they presumed was
the aircraft that just flew above their heads. But as we know from the physical
evidence and complete lack of wreckage, Flight 77—or any other large
commercial airliner—never struck the Pentagon.
These firemen weren’t the only ones to notice an event at this critical juncture.
Soon-to-be Danish Foreign Min. Per Stig Moller told the P3 radio station in his
home country, “I saw fire and smoke rising up from the Pentagon at 9:32 a.m. I
think that there has been a bomb detonated.”
Similarly, Army administrator April Gallop, who holds a top secret clearance
inside the west wing, told author Barbara Honegger that she felt and heard a bomb
go off. “Being in the Army with the training I had, I know what bombs sound and
act like, especially the aftermath, and it sounded and acted like a bomb. There was
no plane or plane parts inside the building, and no smell of jet fuel.” The watch
she was wearing at the time read 9:30 a.m.
Other evidence corroborates this pivotal time. The official FAA timeline states,
“0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west wing of Pentagon.” Of course
the ‘event’ they’re referring to wasn’t an airliner crash, but instead some type of
explosion. Still, their time precedes the government’s version by 5 minutes.
Adding to the intrigue are 2 statements made by DOD employees to NBC
reporter Jim Miklashevski on the morning of 9-11. First, after the NYC strikes, a
Pentagon officer uttered this forewarning, “If I were you, I’d stay out of the E-ring
today because we’re next.” Shortly thereafter, another official informed him, “A
bomb exploded.”
The most obvious question is: why do authorities insist on the 9:37 a.m.
timeframe? Since Flight 77 never struck the Pentagon, they needed a diversion to
shift attention away from the initial 9:31 a.m. internal explosions. This distraction
came in the form of a ‘flyover’ that established the 9:37 a.m. benchmark.
In an Aug. 17, 2008 interview, Pentacon filmmaker Craig Ranke informed this
writer that he’s personally interviewed 13 witnesses who saw an airliner fly north
of the Citgo gas station toward the Pentagon. This point is of the utmost
importance because the government purports that Flight 77’s entry was south of
the Citgo [at an entirely different angle]. Plus, although not a single one of these
eyewitnesses actually saw a plane strike the Pentagon, they did describe hearing a
loud explosion and saw a fireball and smoke rising afterward.
So, what we have is a perfect sleight-of-hand, smoke-and-mirrors scenario.
Since Flight 77 never crashed into the Pentagon, there’s a strong possibility that at
9:31 a.m. conspirators used either a wall breaching kit or shape-cutter charges to
create the first two inner-ring holes (those undetectable by the public). Then, to
create the appearance that a commercial airliner slammed into the outer E-ring,
they performed a ‘flyover’ at 9:37 a.m. while simultaneously setting off a final,
external demolition that resulted in the famous 16-foot circular hole. Such an
operation would be extremely easy to facilitate since that section of the Pentagon
had been under construction for ‘renovations’ prior to 9-11.
The Pentagon can be classified as a magician’s illusion in which a gullible
public was led to believe they saw one thing, when in fact the reality was far
different (and much more sinister).
DID ‘DOOMSDAY PLANE’ DIRECT 9-11 ATTACKS?
Was a mysterious white jet photographed over the White House on the
morning of Sept. 11 the actual flying command center for the 9-11 attacks? When
this writer questioned author Mark Gaffney on Aug. 9, 2008 he replied that it is
“certainly one of the implications” posited in his soon-to-be-released book, The 9-
11 Mystery Plane.
This large white aircraft was later identified as an E-4B, a modified Boeing
747-200 that is also known as the ‘Doomsday Plane.’ During our discussion,
Gaffney said the E-4B has “the ability to communicate with all military commands
worldwide” and that it is a “complete substitute for the Pentagon—the world’s
most advanced plane” which can send launch codes for missiles and communicate
with submarines.
The reason for its moniker—the Doomsday Plane—is explained by Gaffney in
a must-read article entitled, Why Did the World’s Most Advanced Electronics
Warfare Plane Circle Over the White House on 9-11? He says the E-4B is
officially designated as the National Airborne Operations Center and “serves as a
flying command, control and communications center in the event of a nuclear war,
or during a national emergency.” Although only 4 exist in the U.S., each E-4B
costs $800 million and is stacked with a communications satellite dish, electronics
that cover the entire radio spectrum, 48 antennae, the ability to produce its own
electricity, and shielding which protects it from EMPs produced by a nuclear
explosion. Tellingly, as a part of Nightwatch and the First Airborne Command and
Control Squadron, their motto is Videmus Omnia—“We see all.”
So, if these Doomsday planes act as America’s aerial command center during a
nuclear war, would it be safe to say that in a staged terrorist attack involving 4
different aircraft and 4 different targets such as what we saw on 9-11, the
masterminds would rely on this fleet of planes to commandeer the operation from
above? Or, if their calculations got thrown off course (i.e. the delay in takeoff of
Flights 77 and 93), would Doomsday planes (there were 3 used that morning)
subsequently coordinate the contingency plan? When asked if this were likely,
Gaffney said he didn’t want to speculate, but “it was certainly possible.”
Indeed, even after the FAA grounded all U.S. flights at 9:26 a.m., a white
Doomsday plane was photographed and witnessed directly over the White House
and Lafayette Park by CNN’s John King, NBC’s Bob Kur, Linda Brookhart of the
Taxpayer Federation, unnamed secret service agents, and the BBC. The sense of
urgency was so immense that another source—a private pilot and independent
researcher—told this writer, “It’s pretty hard to believe that 2 huge E-4Bs could be
‘scrambled’ from Andrews AFB in only 17 minutes while planes were in the air
headed for Washington, but Andrews could not put up a single combat fighter to
defend the city until it was all over.” At least one E-4B stayed in flight over the
Beltway because at 9:41 a.m.—after the Pentagon strike—ABC’s Peter Jennings
reported that this mystery plane was circling the White House.
This fact in and of itself is amazing because most of Washington DC—
including the White House and Pentagon—are contained within the most restricted
airspace on Earth—Area P-56. Yet here it was—after the FAA grounded all flights
during the worst terrorist ‘attack’ in our nation’s history—very slowly circling
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. while it was being evacuated and Vice President Dick
Cheney hunkered in his secured Emergency Operations Center bunker.
Why was it there? In actuality, Mark Gaffney informed me that these 3 E-4Bs
were directly involved in a massive war game called Global Guardian (later
confirmed by the Omaha World-Herald). Along with NORAD, STRATCOM, and
other agencies, this exercise was fully operational on 9-11, with one of the E-4Bs
originating out of Edwards AFB.
The real headquarters for STRATCOM, however, is Offutt AFB near Omaha,
Neb. that directed all of the bombers, missiles, and submarines used in Global
Guardian. As such, the Doomsday planes acted as an “alternate command post for
top government officials from where they can direct U.S. forces and execute war
orders.” Again, does this description fit perfectly into what was transpiring on 9-
11—in essence, a ‘war’ against America?
Offutt plays an even more essential role because when George W. Bush—
along with Karl Rove, Andy Card, and Ari Fleisher—left Florida on 9-11, Air
Force One eventually transported them to the U.S. Strategic Underground
Command Center at Offutt which, according to Gaffney, is the exact same location
to which the Doomsday plane that hovered over the White House returned.
Coincidence? Hardly, because also at Offutt were Adm. Richard Mies,
commander in chief of STRATCOM, as well as Warren Buffett, who was hosting
a charity golf event.
Now, of all the locations on our planet, what are the odds that the ‘world’s
second richest man’ would be at Offutt for a round of golf, along with his special
guest, Ann Tatlock, CEO of Fiduciary Trust located in the WTC towers?
According to the Journal Star, Offutt is also the “military nerve center that is the
‘eyes and ears’ across the globe” with a direct line to the National Military
Command Center in DC. It has likewise been confirmed that Offutt directed the
Global Guardian exercises. Could this be why George W. Bush made a beeline to
Offutt—he had to receive his marching orders after the attacks were carried out?
In addition, Mark Gaffney has proof of a deliberate 25-second time lag for all
radar over the eastern seaboard on 9-11, and that none of the E-4Bs showed up on
radar. Further, former Marine intelligence officer and Black Ice author Dan Verton
identified one of the Doomsday Plane passengers as none other than Brent
Scowcroft, who was Nat. Sec. Adviser under Presidents Gerald Ford and George
Bush I, chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board under Bush II, a
member of the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations, a
Bilderberg attendee on multiple occasions, while also an employee of Kissinger
Associates. If an individual such as Gen. Scowcroft was aboard one of those crafts
on 9-11, it certainly wasn’t to simply take a joy ride.
The above-mentioned pilot source also presented the following information to
this writer. “Since both Rumsfeld and Cheney were involved in COG exercises
[continuation of government] in the 1990s using E-4Bs as their flying command
post, it certainly seems that they were orchestrating a COG operation of some kind
while apparently not concerned that more ‘hijacked’ planes might get through to
Washington. This could indicate either foreknowledge of the attack or a real time
decision to allow the attack to proceed so they could switch control of the entire
government to a ‘unified authority’ when the smoke cleared. If more planes had
been ‘hijacked’ and hit targets in Washington, the disruption might have been
large enough to enable an all out takeover by self-appointed officials on board the
E-4Bs, along with Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and a few others.”
With these words, we have now reached the critical mass of 9-11 and what
truly happened that tragic morning. Was the mystery plane documented in this
article an all-seeing eye in the sky that coordinated the 9-11 terror attacks?
Considering the high-level military men involved, the top-secret programs which
were in operation, and the various agencies directly linked to Global Guardian, it
seems more than likely that it played a central role—even as it hovered above the
White House immediately prior to an ‘event’ occurring at the Pentagon.
DEFENSE INDUSTRY INSIDER SUPPORTS
FLIGHT 93 MISSILE THEORY
Was a missile shot into the ground at Shanksville on the morning of 9-11
instead of Flight 93 being downed by Arab ‘terrorists’? This is the contention
proposed in Phantom Flight 93. Now, a former defense contractor has come
forward to emphatically support this theory, claiming it was actually an AGM-158
stealth cruise missile that produced the 12-foot crater in Pennsylvania.
Although this writer intends to protect the source’s identity, I can say that this
individual has a master’s degree in structural analysis, as well as being employed
as an engineer at a major defense contractor. Building upon this background, the
source took data from Phantom Flight 93 and expanded upon it to fit one of the
final pieces to the 9-11 Puzzle. Beginning with eyewitness Susan McElwain’s
testimony of seeing a white, molded, military-type missile soar approximately 40-
feet over her head near the outskirts of Shanksville, this source set out to discover
precisely what sort of object she saw.
What he arrived at was “the inescapable conclusion that the type of missile she
described is what is termed a stealth cruise missile.” He based this determination
on a number of factors, including the fact that stealth technology is “deliberately
designed so that it will be difficult to detect before it reaches its target.” Since
Mrs. McElwain detected this missile 40-feet above her head, our source points out
that “one of the main tactics used by stealth aircraft and missiles is the ability to
fly at very low altitudes in order to avoid radar and visual detection.” Being so
close to the ground—essentially at treetop level—hardly anyone would be able to
see this missile unless they were right on top of it, as Susan McElwain was.
Further reinforcing his argument: since the missile in question was molded in
one tubular piece, the lack of rivets and joints—which are highly reflective—could
“reduce its radar signature.” In addition, a “stealth missile would be designed to
make little or no sound.” This sentiment precisely mirrors a statement made by
McElwain in Phantom Flight 93.
In his analysis, there is only one fact that seemingly contradicts McElwain’s
missile being an AGM-158, and that is her description of a ‘fin’ on its tail. But
even though a ‘spoiler’ isn’t seen in photographs of the AGM-158, “a big vertical
fin like the one described by Ms. McElwain extends after the missile has been
launched.” Also, the AGM-158 has wings, but these would not be needed either
because “the design of the missile is such that with its wings retracted, the body of
the missile itself acts as an airfoil or wing, giving the missile lift. When flying in
its maximum stealth mode, the wings would remain in a retracted position beneath
the missile,” which is exactly how the conspirators would have wanted it so as to
remain undetected.
Taken one step further, if a stealth missile was shot into Shanksville, it would
seem logical that a stealth-type aircraft would have been needed to launch it.
Could this long overlooked detail explain why so many witnesses described seeing
a low flying white aircraft in the sky over southwestern Pa. on the morning of 9-
11? This plane would have been invisible to radar (which it was), but not to the
human eye.
Since stealth aircraft technology was an integral part of the Shanksville
deception, my source asks whether this part of the country also holds a key to what
happened at the Pentagon. “A stealth aircraft could easily launch a stealth missile
from Pa. and have that missile reach Washington totally undetected. This may
have been how the attack against the Pentagon was carried out. The stealth aircraft
itself did not necessarily have to be in the immediate vicinity of DC in order to hit
the Pentagon with great accuracy. The stealth missile could have traveled on its
own from Pa. to Washington to hit the Pentagon without anyone being the wiser
about where it came from.”
The implications are clear, as this man so adeptly describes. “If it was a stealth
missile which hit the Pentagon, this would explain why the defensive missile
systems protecting the Pentagon were not activated. The radar systems and other
sensors at the Pentagon may not have had a capability for detecting stealth
missiles, which means that the defensive missiles surrounding the Pentagon would
have remained inactive. Those in charge of defending the Pentagon against attack
may never have known what hit them. By not being able to track the missile on
radar, there would be no way to trace it back to its point of origin.”
Lisa Guliani, radio show host Keith Hanson, and I make it very clear in our
book that Flight 93 is the great underreported trigger to unraveling the overall 9-11
conspiracy. As this latest source attests: September 11th wasn’t initiated by 19
Muslim terrorists, but instead it “was obviously a highly sophisticated operation
involving the most advanced technological advancements contained within the
U.S. inventory of weapons systems.” The only question now is: why has Flight 93
been so deliberately and obviously ignored by the 9-11 truth community and other
broadcasters when it is a Pandora’s Box that the government definitely does not
want opened?
MICROBIOLOGIST MASS MURDER LIST GROWS
Is Potential Zionist Anthrax Killer Being Shielded?
Another political body count is mounting. Over the past 7 years, more than
two-dozen of the world’s most esteemed microbiologists—all of who focused on
combating bioterrorism—have died under highly questionable circumstances. One
was stabbed with a sword; another mowed over by a car, while a third was bashed
over the head until dead. There’s more, including a scientist found with repeated
stab wounds to the chest; another was shoved under a chair (naked from the waist
down); one perished in a nitrogen-filled airlock; another was carjacked with his
keys still in the ignition and a full tank of gas.
None of these men died of natural causes. Their murders were deliberate, and
it’s sending a very clear message to virus experts, immunologists, entomologists,
and those researching bio-weaponry—your lives are in grave danger.
The latest casualty was bio-defense pioneer Bruce Ivins, who reportedly
committed suicide on July 29, 2008 at Frederick Memorial Hospital from an
overdose of Tylenol 3. [How he obtained enough pills to kill himself in a mental
hospital is still open to question.] What makes Ivins’ death even more noteworthy
was his direct link to the 2001 anthrax case, first via his potential development of a
vaccine to combat the toxin, and secondly as a 2003 recipient of the Decoration
for Exceptional Service—the most prestigious award a civilian scientist can
receive. Ivins also assisted the government in their investigation of the anthrax
scare.
Those closest to Ivins are publicly skeptical of the suicide story, pointing out
that he was a Red Cross volunteer, played keyboard at his local church, enjoyed
gardening, and was married with 2 children. On the other hand, to paint the most
horrific picture possible, an FBI-affiliated social worker named Jean Duley stated
that Ivins was, in reality, a sociopath, homicidal revenge killer who wanted to
murder his coworkers in a blaze of glory after discovering that he was the target of
a Justice Dept. investigation into the anthrax case.
This testimony is questionable on a number of different levels. For 18 years,
Ivins held one of the highest security clearances possible in the Dept. of Def. As
journalist Scott Creighton asked, “How did all those educated and degreed
psychologists and psychiatrists miss this criminal intent that a social worker [Jean
Duley] picked up on in one group session?” If Ivins exhibited such homicidal
tendencies, wouldn’t it be identified at least once in nearly two decades, especially
since he worked at Fort Detrick, home of the U.S. Army’s Medical Research
Institute for Infectious Diseases at one of the most guarded facilities in the
country?
More importantly, Ivins is now the second victim of a government witch-hunt
that began with the concerted harassment of Dr. Steven Hatfill, whose career and
reputation were irreparably destroyed before receiving a $5.8 million settlement
from the feds. Conveniently enough, less than a month after the government
awarded Hatfill his judgment—with their anthrax case seemingly stalled and going
nowhere because they pursued the wrong man for years—all of a sudden Bruce
Ivins overdosed and the entire matter was suddenly solved. Nobody has to ever
again worry about anthrax-laced letters like the ones Tom Brokaw and Sen. Tom
Daschle received.
But has the real culprit actually been identified, or is there someone else being
shielded from prosecution? The answer may lie with Dr. Philip M. Zack, a Zionist
microbiologist who had already attempted to frame an Arab colleague, Dr. Ayaad
Asaad, for the anthrax scare. Zack, it turns out, is Jewish, and was fired from his
post at Fort Detrick for continually harassing Dr. Asaad in an extremely
discriminatory fashion because he was Arab. However, due to his connections
inside the top-secret lab, security cameras recorded Zack entering Fort Detrick on
numerous occasions. The individual who illegally let him in was Dr. Marian K.
Rippy, also Jewish.
In addition, Zack was well acquainted with military-grade anthrax, the same
type that was used to lace postal packages in 2001. Further evidence implicating
our government were DNA tests linking the original source spores (which are very
rare) to Fort Detrick. Zack again becomes a prime suspect because the anthrax
scare occurred shortly after 9-11 at a time when the neo-cons and Israel were
primed to begin their ‘War on Terror.’ Zack was known as a rabid ‘Arab-hatingJew,’
and the letters attached to each anthrax sample teemed with anti-Semitic
rhetoric meant to implicate Arabs (“Death to Israel, Allah is Great”).
Was the entire anthrax hysteria motivated to cast further suspicion on Muslims
to justify the neo-cons’ desire for a Mid-East war? Was the anthrax scare akin to
Saddam Hussein’s purported WMDs, another tactic to push us toward an Iraqi
invasion? Equally as despicable, were Steven Hatfill and Bruce Ivins mere
scapegoats used by the government to divert attention away from Dr. Zack’s
involvement? Finally, are many of the world’s top microbiologists being murdered
to minimize efforts to counter the effects of a future bio-terrorist attack? Who
would have ever thought that brainy, isolated lab workers held the world’s most
deadly white-collar profession?
Dr. Bruce Ivins was a shy, dedicated scientist. Following his death, he’s been
characterized as a madman wearing a bulletproof vest who poisoned his victims
via the nation’s most deadly act of biological terrorism. But, if the anthrax scare
was simply another neo-con/Mossad psy-op, the implications for a cover-up are
enormous. Many of Dr. Ivins’ colleagues and friends don’t believe claims that he
was a killer, and feel his ‘suicide’ was the result of non-stop, heavy-handed
harassment by government officials. Disease specialist W. Russell Byrne
characterized him as “looking like a guy who was being led to his execution.” Has
another number just been added to the mysterious microbiologist body count?
OPIUM PRODUCTION CONTINUES TO SET RECORDS
IN AFGHANISTAN
“Afghanistan’s heroin-producing poppy crop set another record this season.”
So read Japan Today on July 18, 2007. Afghanistan now supplies over 90 percent
of the world’s heroin, generating nearly $200 billion in revenue. Since the U.S.
invasion on Oct. 7, 2001 their opium output has increased 33 fold (to over 8,250
metric tons a year).
To date, the U.S. has been in Afghanistan for over 7 years. We’ve spent $177
billion in that country alone, and have the most powerful and technologically
advanced military forces on earth. GPS tracking devices can locate any spot
imaginable by simply pushing a few buttons, while satellites and Google Map can
literally look in our front windows.
Still, bumper crops keep flourishing year after year, even though heroin
production is a very laborious, intricate process. The plants must be planted,
grown, harvested, and then after the morphine is extracted it has to be cooked,
refined, packaged into bricks, and transported from rural locales across national
borders. Thousands of people are involved, yet despite the massive resources at
our disposal, heroin keeps flowing at record levels.
Common sense suggests that such prolific trade over an extended period of
time is no accident, especially when the history of what has transpired in this
region is considered. While the CIA ran its operations during the Vietnam War,
the Golden Triangle supplied the world with most of its heroin. When that war
ended in 1975, an intriguing event took place a few years later in 1979 when
Zbigniew Brzezinski covertly manipulated the Soviet Union into invading
Afghanistan.
Behind the scenes, the CIA, along with Pakistan’s ISI, were secretly funding
Afghanistan’s mujahideen to fight their Russian foes. Prior to this war, opium
production in Afghanistan was minimal. But according to historian Alfred McCoy,
an expert on the subject, a shift in focus took place. “Within 2 years of the
onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, the Pakistan-Afghanistan
borderlands became the world’s top heroin producer.” Soon, as Prof. Michel
Chossudovsky notes, “CIA assets again controlled the heroin trade. As the
mujahideen guerillas seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to
plant opium as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders
and local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan intelligence operated
hundreds of heroin laboratories.”
Eventually, the Soviet Union was defeated (their version of Vietnam), and
ultimately lost the Cold War. The aftermath, however, proved to be an entirely
new can of worms. During his research, McCoy discovered that “the CIA
supported various Afghan drug lords, for instance Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The CIA
did not handle heroin, but it did provide its drug lord allies with transport, arms,
and political protection.”
By 1994, a new force emerged in the region—the Taliban—that took over the
drug trade. Chossudovsky again discovered that “the Americans had secretly, and
through the Pakistanis [specifically the ISI], supported the Taliban’s assumption of
power.” These strange bedfellows endured a rocky relationship until July 2000
when Taliban leaders banned the planting of poppies. This alarming development,
along with other disagreements over proposed oil pipelines through Eurasia, posed
a serious problem for power centers in the West. Without heroin money at their
disposal, billions of dollars could not be funneled into various CIA black budget
projects.
Already sensing trouble in this volatile region, 18 influential neo-cons signed a
letter in 1998 that became a blueprint for war—the infamous Project for a New
American Century (PNAC). The initial phase of their plan was executed on Sept.
11, 2001. 15 days later, CIA Dir. George Tenet sent his top secret Special
Operations Group (SOG) into Afghanistan. One of the biggest revelations in
Tenet’s book, At the Center of the Storm, was that CIA forces directed the
Afghanistan invasion, not the Pentagon.
In the Jan. 26, 2003 edition of Time magazine, Douglas Waller describes
Donald Rumsfeld’s reaction to this development. “When aides told Rumsfeld that
his Army Green Beret A-Teams couldn’t go into Afghanistan until the CIA
contingent had laid the groundwork with local warlords, he erupted, ‘I have all
these guys under arms, and we’ve got to wait like little birds in a nest for the CIA
to let us go in?’”
But the real operator in Afghanistan was Richard Armitage, a man whose
legend includes being the biggest heroin trafficker in Cambodia and Laos during
the Vietnam War; director of the State Dept.’s Foreign Narcotics Control Office (a
front for CIA drug dealing); head of the Far East Company (used to funnel drug
money out of the Golden Triangle); a close liaison with Oliver North during the
Iran-Contra cocaine-for-guns scandal; a primary Pentagon official in the terror and
covert ops field under George Bush Sr.; one of the original signatories of the
infamous PNAC document; and the man who helped CIA Dir. William Casey run
weapons to the mujahideen during their war against the Soviet Union. Armitage
was also stationed in Iran during the mid-1970s right before Ayatollah Khomeini
overthrew the Shah. Armitage may well be the greatest covert operator in U.S.
history.
On Sept. 10, 2001 Armitage met with none other than the UK’s national
security advisor, Sir David Manning. Was Armitage “passing on specific
intelligence information about the impending terrorist attacks?” The scenario is
quite plausible because one day later—on 9-11—Dick Cheney directly called for
Armitage’s presence down in his bunker. Immediately after WTC 2 was struck,
Armitage told BBC Radio, “I was told to go to the operations center [where] I
spent the rest of the day in the ops center with the vice president.” These two share
a long history together. Not only was Armitage employed by Cheney’s former
company Halliburton (via Brown & Root), he was also a deputy when Cheney was
Sec. of Def. under Bush the Elder. More importantly, Cheney and Armitage had
joint business and consulting interests in the Central Asian pipeline that had been
contracted by Unocal. The only problem standing between them and the Caspian
Sea’s vast energy reserves was the Taliban.
Do you see how all the pieces are starting to fit together? Since the 1980s,
Armitage amassed a huge roster of allies in Pakistan’s ISI. He was also one of the
Vulcans—along with Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Rabbi Dov
Zakheim—who coordinated George W. Bush’s geo-strategic foreign policy
initiatives. Then, after 9-11, he negotiated with the Pakistanis prior to our invasion
of Afghanistan, while also becoming Bush’s Dep. Sec. of State stationed in
Afghanistan.
Our ‘enemy’, or course, was the Taliban ‘terrorists’, but George Tenet, Colin
Powell, Porter Goss, and Armitage had developed a close relationship with
Pakistan’s military head of the ISI—Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad—who was cited in a
Sept. 2001 FBI report as “supporting and financing the alleged 9-11 terrorists, as
well as having links to al Qaeda and the Taliban.” The line between friend and foe
gets even murkier. Afghan Pres. Hamid Karzai not only collaborated with the
Taliban, but was also on Unocal’s payroll during the mid-90s. He is also described
by Saudi Arabia’s Al-Watan newspaper as being “a Central Intelligence Agency
covert operator since the 1980s that collaborated with the CIA in funding U.S. aid
to the Taliban.”
In retrospect, it’s now clear that capturing a new, abundant source of heroin
was an intricate part of the U.S. ‘War on Terror.’ Hamid Karzai is a puppet ruler
of the CIA, Afghanistan is a full-fledged narco-state, and the poppies that flourish
there have yet to be eradicated, as was proven in 2003 when the Bush
administration refused to destroy the crops, despite having every chance to do so.
Major drug dealers are rarely arrested, smugglers enjoy carte blanche immunity,
and Nushin Arbabzadah, writing for The Guardian, theorized, “U.S. Army planes
leave Afghanistan carrying coffins empty of bodies, but filled with drugs.” Is that
why the military protested so vehemently when reporters tried to photograph
returning caskets?
The entire scenario is a ruse. Pakistan has emerged as a bona fide militarized
police state whose organized crime syndicates transport heroin to foreign markets.
Profits from this lucrative trade are laundered and deposited in updated BCCIstyle
western banks, while the Taliban maintain their own network of opium
farmers, mules (drug runners), and tribal enforcers. In essence, the Taliban, CIA,
ISI, drug dealers, organized crime, Big Oil, arms dealers, the Pentagon, shadow
corporations, mercenaries, money launderers, and various government agencies all
exist in a twisted, symbiotic relationship; their vested interests being the millions
of dollars resulting from war and narcotics trafficking in Afghanistan.
BIDEN BLASTED FOR ‘BUNKER BLUNDER’
How Joe Biden’s latest gaffe shines renewed light on the events of 9-11
Once again, mainstream media sources failed to report the real story behind
the story. On May 16, 2009 Eleanor Clift, Newsweek’s contributing editor, dished
up another tasty entrée of Joe Biden’s specialty—foot-in-the-mouth du jour. At the
Gridiron Club’s annual white-tie gala, the vice president disclosed classified
information regarding Dick Cheney’s infamous underground bunker beneath the
Naval Observatory in D.C.
Being that Biden took over residence from Cheney in the vice presidential
manor this past January, he related to fellow diners (journalists included) how a
young Naval tour guide “showed him the hideaway, which is behind a massive
steel door secured by an elaborate lock with a narrow connecting hallway lined
with shelves filled with communications equipment.” Clift continued, “The officer
explained that when Cheney was in lock down, this was where his most trusted
aides were stationed.”
Heckled by pundits for the umpteenth time, Biden dismissed his statements by
saying that he was actually referring to an “upstairs workspace.” But his words
were obviously misleading because in Dec. 2002 neighbors living adjacent to the
vice president’s residence complained of ‘strange explosions’ emanating from
beneath Cheney’s home. In response, the Naval Observatory’s superintendent sent
each a letter. “Due to its sensitive nature in support of national security and
homeland defense, this project’s specific information is classified and cannot be
released.” The memo also stated, “The work was urgent and needed to be done on
a highly accelerated schedule.” In a Dr. Strangelove-style twist, Cheney (who
denied the very existence of this Bat-cave), ordered Google to obscure his
residence from their satellite maps (which they did).
Cheney and 9-11
With these revelations in mind, some commentators have erroneously stated
that vice president Cheney hunkered down in this bunker during the 9-11 ‘terrorist
attacks’. But as previously stated, construction didn’t officially begin on this
enclave until Dec. 2002. In actuality, at approximately 9:10-9:20 a.m. on Sept. 11,
Cheney was scurried to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC)
beneath the White House east wing. Here, a crucial event took place that had a
profound effect on the purported Pentagon strike.
According to Transp. Sec. Norman Mineta, he entered the PEOC at 9:25 or
9:26 a.m., whereupon he witnessed an aide repeatedly giving the vice president
frantic updates. Mineta provided the following public testimony to the 9-11
Commission on Apr. 23, 2003:
During the time that the airplane [Flight 77] was coming in to
the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in to
say to the vice president, ‘The plane is 50 miles out.’ ‘The
plane is 30 miles out.’ And when it got down to ‘the plane is
10 miles out,’ the young man also said to the vice president,
‘Do the orders still stand?’ The vice president turned and
whipped his neck around and said, ‘Of course the orders still
stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?’
Now, as most prudent observers realize, Flight 77 never struck the Pentagon.
But, an event did take place at 9:37 a.m. where a certain amount of damage
occurred, resulting in 125 deaths. But what are we to make of the ‘orders’ that this
aide questioned Dick Cheney about? In an excellent article by Prof. David Ray
Griffin on Apr. 28, 2008 entitled 9-11 Contradictions: When Did Cheney Enter the
Underground Bunker, he writes, “The expected orders—especially on a day when
2 hijacked airliners had already crashed into buildings in New York—would have
been to shoot down any non-military aircraft entering the ‘prohibited’ airspace
over Washington.”
But since Cheney was repeatedly asked about these ‘orders,’ Griffin concludes
quite perceptively. “The question made sense only if the orders were to do
something unusual—not to shoot the aircraft down. It appeared, accordingly, that
Mineta had inadvertently reported Cheney’s confirmation of stand-down orders.”
Obviously, Flight 77 was never shot down over our nation’s capital (nor did it
strike the Pentagon). In a May 5, 2008 article, 9-11 researcher Aidan Monaghan
stresses that ample notice was given to government officials. “The FAA notified
the military about the suspected hijacking of Flight 77 at 9:24 a.m., if not before.
The FBI’s Washington field office was also notified that Flight 77 had been
hijacked at about 9:20 a.m.” In essence, the Pentagon and White House had an
eternity to react, but failed to do so. Somebody ordered the stand-down, and
operationally at least, one of those men was Dick Cheney.
The Armageddon Plan
Cheney and Def. Sec. Donald Rumsfeld’s hands-on involvement in the
execution of 9-11 can be traced back to what journalist James Mann calls The
Armageddon Plan in the Mar. 2004 issue of The Atlantic magazine. During the
Reagan administration—when Cold War paranoia still ran high—Cheney and
Rumsfeld joined 40-60 other federal officials in a highly classified program
dealing with COG (continuity-of-government).
During these secretive operations, various shadow government teams were
formed in the event of a nuclear strike by the Soviets. In an article for The
Guardian by Tom Vanderbilt entitled Is This Bush’s Secret Bunker?, he describes
how “the president could repair to Mount Weather; Congress had its secret bunker
in Culpeper, Virginia; the Pentagon was given a rocky redoubt called Site R
[Raven Rock] in the mountains of southwest Pennsylvania; while the nation’s air
defenses were run out of NORAD.” Vanderbilt describes Mount Weather as “a
sprawling underground complex bristling with mainframe computers, air
circulation pumps, and a television/radio studio for post nuclear presidential
broadcasts.”
As each of these teams was dispatched to clandestine locales, mock
‘presidents’ were appointed to each. Not surprisingly, both Cheney and Rumsfeld
were designated to be ‘commanders-in-chief’ of their respective squadrons. Mann
also explained, “The capstone to all these efforts was a special airplane, the
National Emergency Airborne Command Post, a modified Boeing 747 based at
Andrews Air Force Base and specially outfitted with a conference room and
advanced communications gear. In it, a president could remain in the air and run
the country during a nuclear showdown.”
Considering these words, let’s fast-forward to Sept. 11, 2001 when bedlam
broke loose in Washington. As Mann concludes in his expose, “Cheney and
Rumsfeld suddenly began to act out parts of a script they had rehearsed years
before. Operating from an underground shelter beneath the White House called the
Presidential Emergency Operations Center, Cheney told Bush to delay a planned
flight back from Florida to Washington.” In the meantime, Rumsfeld sent others,
like Paul Wolfowitz, to out-of-town bunkers.
In essence, while one team of conspirators ran the show in New York City
from Rudy Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) on the 23rd floor
of WTC 7, another team consisting of Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Gen. Richard
Meyers hearkened back to their special training via the Armageddon Plan. When
questioned a few days after 9-11 by NBC’s Tim Russert in regard to their actions
at the time, Cheney responded furtively, “We did a lot of planning during the Cold
War with respect to the possibility of a nuclear incident.”
When Joe Biden spilled the beans about Cheney’s not-so-secret bunker, he
didn’t know how closely he came to opening up an entirely different can of
worms.
JESSE VENTURA REVEALS BLACK BOX MYSTERY
ON CONSPIRACY THEORY TV SHOW
Former Minn. Governor Jesse Ventura’s Dec. 9, 2009 broadcast of Conspiracy
Theory ended with a major disclosure. Not only did recovery and rescue worker
Mike Bellone reiterate earlier 2004 claims that the FBI had recovered 3 of the 4
black boxes from Ground Zero, but he also quoted a supervisor for Flight 11. This
woman monitored actual live transmissions emanating from the airline, and
according to her, the ‘hijackers’ were already in the plane’s cockpit prior to
takeoff. Further, she claimed others on the ground were fully aware of this
situation while Flight 11 taxied on the runway, and they still allowed it to take off.
Initially, Bellone promised to produce this employee for Ventura, but she
declined an interview at the last minute out of fear for her life. After having her
house, car and cell phone bugged, federal officials frightened her into not talking.
Bellone also divulged that FBI officials told him not to discuss this matter with the
media.
Could such startling revelations be the reason why 9-11 Commission members
determined that no black boxes had been located in the Pit’s rubble? If the
American public listened to these recordings and heard Arabic (as well as English)
being spoken, the entire scam would be revealed.
However, this line of reasoning doesn’t imply that the ‘19 terrorists’ blamed
for these attacks were actually the masterminds. Instead, it adds further weight to
the premise that they filled the role of patsies. For starters, there is still no concrete
evidence that any of these individuals ever boarded the 4 flights. Rather, were they
merely useful idiots who mistakenly thought they were partaking in a hijacking,
when in reality Flights 11 and 175 were operated via remote control after take-off
to strike WTC 1 and 2? In this sense, similar to Lee Harvey Oswald who had an
elaborate ‘legend’ created around him prior to the JFK assassination and was
deliberately placed on the scene, were they too the byproducts of an elaborately
constructed plot to shift blame away from the actual plotters?
Additional evidence of a cover-up arose when Ventura questioned FBI
counter-terrorism expert Jack Cloonan, who stated rhetorically, “Does the U.S.
government do things in the dead of night that they don’t want seen in the light of
day? Of course they do.” Then, when told that Sept. 11 may be the first time ever
in the history of recorded flight where 4 black boxes completely vanished,
Cloonan replied, “So what.”
Airline investigative expert Dave Leppard also acknowledged that he’d never
once been at a crash site where the black boxes had not been discovered. He then
proceeded to describe how these very distinct, bright orange boxes made out of
titanium are virtually indestructible. “The odds are almost zero-percent that
they’re not found,” he concluded.
Journalist Dave Lindorff next weighed in by recounting a meeting he had with
NTSB officials. After inquiring whether the FBI had secured these devices, he was
asked, “Do you want the real answer, or the official answer?” An official then
disclosed that all 4 boxes were in the FBI’s possession. Lindorff summarized the
great deception played on us. “Investigators found fingernail-sized shards of bone
to identify the victims, yet we’re to believe that all 4 black boxes are still
missing?”
Mike Bellone, who worked at Ground Zero for 257 straight days, actually saw
one of the recovered boxes 3 to 4 weeks after the WTC collapse, and personally
witnessed the FBI loading this equipment onto a tractor-trailer. He also referred to
New York City firefighter Nicholas Demasi, who claims to have been present
when ‘locaters’ found 2 other boxes.
Why hasn’t the public been made aware of these groundbreaking
developments? Ventura stated point-blank, “Government officials knowingly
destroyed all the evidence at that crime scene. They got rid of every shred of
evidence. They melted it down, built ships out of it, or put it on a boat to China.”
What little else remains is stored in the mysterious Hanger 17 at New York’s JFK
Airport. Absolutely no one is allowed access to this evidence.
NEW WEBSITE QUESTIONS ISRAEL’S 9-11 ROLE
How can the truth hurt a ‘truth movement’? This fundamental question is being
asked by a recently launched website called Rediscover911.com. Specifically,
these disaffected researchers are asking why—after 8 long years—isn’t Israel’s
central role in planning, coordinating, and executing the 9-11 terrorist attacks
being placed at the forefront of new investigations, especially in light of such
overwhelming evidence.
The site’s founder, a Kansas City dentist named Dr. Ed Kendrick, writes on his
website, “9-11 was a murderous Israeli false flag operation with Jewish and
gentile American helpers (sayanim). It was intended to fool Americans into
becoming enraged at Muslims and into fighting Israel’s enemies for her, all the
while picking up the tab for these wars and giving Israel billions outright.”
In a Dec. 29, 2009 interview, Kendrick explained to this writer why such an
elaborate protection racket has been erected by the Zionists and their controlledopposition
network. “There exists a Luciferian presence in the world, and 9-11
was a lie of biblical proportions. The nuclear power Israel is so psychopathic that
they’ll unleash great harm if exposed about 9-11.” He continued, “I can’t envision
freedom for mankind will resurface for hundreds of years if we don’t identify this
criminal cabal and take them to a place where they’ll never again inflict such
damage.”
Regrettably, Kendrick asserts that the neo-con/Israel-first connection that
implemented these terrorist strikes had willing allies in place before Sept. 11,
2001. “From its very inception, the so-called 9-11 truth movement, otherwise
known as the people who say that George Bush and his cronies did 9-11, has been
ultimately led and controlled by the same people that perpetrated the dastardly
attacks.”
Who precisely are these individuals? Echoing a phrase popularized by Michael
Collins Piper, those who refuse to acknowledge Israel’s role are known as Judas
Goats. Kendrick writes, “Judas Goats are prominent figures whose job it is to
broadcast untruths so that people will not know they are in trouble. They are
trained goats used in stockyards to lead sheep and cattle to their slaughter.”
Of course, we need to ask yet again: why would people consciously choose to
act as scripted gatekeepers, thereby letting the real killers escape justice? Worse,
why are they so willing to point a finger of blame at their own country (i.e. the
limited hangout of ‘9-11 was an inside job’ led by Bush & Company) yet utterly
refuse to name participants from a foreign power (the Mossad and Israeli
government)? We already know how, when, where, and why 9-11 occurred.
Shouldn’t every 9-11 truther finally decide to say who did it instead of continuing
to ignore Israel’s role?
Los Angeles activist and Rediscover911.com contributor Zan Overall has spent
the past few weeks passing out fliers, such as in front of the Israeli Consulate on
Wilshire Blvd. He calls 9-11 an “inside/outside job.” During a Dec. 29, 2009
interview with this writer, he surmised, “The 9-11 truth movement knows about
Israel’s involvement. But mentioning anything about the Jewish people is a hotbutton
issue. It’s a big taboo because the Israeli lobby is hugely powerful and you
can’t offend them.”
However, the stakes are even higher. If the American public ever discovered
Israel’s role as 9-11 masterminds, outrage would erupt. Subsequently, the
blowback would be disastrous to our supposed ‘ally’ who’d immediately lose
billions in foreign aid. Secondly, after realizing the depth of their deception and
how we’d been duped into 8 years of war against Afghanistan and Iraq, the ‘myth’
of Osama bin Laden would also become crystal clear.
At this stage, Israel’s very existence and survival would be seriously
jeopardized. When coupled with information regarding their murderous actions
against the USS Liberty, many patriotic-minded Americans would rightfully call
for the U.S. to attack Israel. Or, if we withdrew all support for them in the Middle
East, they’d become open game for the entire Arab world. Terrified of being
exposed for their bloodthirsty treachery, its obvious Israel has done everything
humanly possible to conceal their savage actions. Thus, vast protection rackets
have been established not only in the mainstream media, but also in ‘alternative
media’ venues such as radio, books, websites and activist circles.
As it stands now at this critical juncture in time (with Israel’s next enemy—
Iran—in the crosshairs), 2 primary gauges exist to determine whether a news
source is legitimate. First, do they acknowledge that the official 9-11 story
forwarded by neo-cons and Israel-firsters is an unabashed lie? More importantly,
are they willing to place Israel’s central role in the 9-11 attacks at the forefront? If
these sources refuse to take such absolutely necessary steps, truth-seekers need to
ask an obvious question: why are they so willing to protect a cabal of criminals
that murdered 3,000 innocent American citizens, not to mention our servicemen
stationed abroad who continue doing Israel’s dirty work for them on the
battlefield?
NEW PICTURES FROM 9-11 RAISE MORE QUESTIONS
Pictures are worth a thousand words, and when they’re used to further the
deadly lies of a massive government propaganda campaign, these images become
even more potent. On Feb. 10, 2010 a dozens photos taken from a helicopter on
the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 by NYPD Aviation Unit Detective Greg
Semendinger were made available to media outlets. ABC News obtained them
under the Freedom of Information Act.
When this writer spoke with veteran 9-11 researcher Vinnie Sammartino on
Feb. 11, 2010 he asked a poignant question: “Why were these pictures released
now? What is the purpose?” One reason is obvious. Playing on public emotions,
the neo-con/Israel-first cabal opposed to open trials in a New York City criminal
court for the ‘alleged 9-11 terrorists’ keeps reiterating a common theme. “New
Yorkers don’t need these horrors thrust upon them again.” They repeat this mantra
while the new photos flash across our television screens, re-triggering traumas
from that awful day.
Despite their heavy-handed attempts at fear mongering, long-time researchers
viewing these images see some striking irregularities. First, talking heads continue
mentioning ‘raging infernos’ whose extreme heat purportedly caused the WTC
towers to collapse. Yet it’s clear that after an initial fireball caused by jet fuel
escaped outside WTC 2, the flames were of a minor variety at best.
Sammartino suspects more sinister motives. “I don’t trust anything the
government or mainstream media tells me. Look at photo number one. An entire
floor-line is glaring red. What would cause an entire floor to glow in a straight
line? Fire doesn’t do that. You need temperatures in excess of 2,500 degrees to
melt steel. The towers didn’t have enough fuel available to make an entire floor
glow. The only thing inside them was office furniture and equipment. I think they
may have subtly photo-shopped the pictures just enough not to raise suspicions
except for those with a trained eye.”
Jan Ramirez, chief curator of the National Sept. 11 Memorial & Museum, did
her best to dispel any ‘conspiratorial’ notions during a Feb. 10, 2010 interview
with the Associated Press. After describing how Semendinger’s helicopter
patrolled the skies over lower Manhattan shortly after WTC 1 was struck, Ramirez
said, “Sometime after 10 a.m., they [the NYPD Aviation Unit] were able to predict
that the north tower was going to fall.”
Amazingly, she must not have even looked at the pictures taken by the pilots.
There is no indication whatsoever that these exceptionally strong, well-built
structures were in any imminent danger of collapse. The photographs clearly show
nothing more than minor office fires, not raging infernos. Then, even more
importantly, by photo number three in the sequence, we see WTC 1 in the midst of
collapse. What’s most amazing is that this 110-story building is instantaneously
turning to dust—both concrete and steel—even before it hits the ground. How can
a billion-pound tower be converted into dust while it’s still falling? The power
source needed to wreak such destruction is mind-boggling. Tiny little fires created
by jet fuel and office chairs certainly don’t hold that capacity.
9-11 activist Michael Langston concurred with this analysis in a Feb. 12, 2010
written statement to this writer. “What strikes me most about the billowing dust
clouds is their eerie similarity to the pyroclastic ash clouds of volcanic eruptions,
which are explosive events. This similarity in appearance provides further
evidence that the 9-11 WTC ‘collapses’ were also explosive in nature. A simple
gravitational collapse could not possibly generate enough energy to account for
such an explosive phenomenon.”
In addition, by the time one views the final photograph in this sequence, the
entirety of Battery Park and lower Manhattan are completely engulfed in dust and
smoke. This visual image confirms a theory proposed in Phantom Flight 93 that
WTC 7 was supposed to have collapsed at the same time as WTC 1 & 2 (when
everything was concealed from view). Of course, WTC 7 held Mayor Rudolph
Giuliani’s Emergency Command Center on the 23rd floor. It also served as a
perfect vantage point for the on-site 9-11 plotters to orchestrate the controlled
demolitions. But due to being insufficiently wired, WTC 7 only collapsed at 5:20
p.m.—in full view of cameras that caught a 47-story building fall for absolutely no
reason. Airliners had not struck it, nor did it sustain damage from flying debris.
Plus, only one miniscule fire burned on the twelfth floor. Still, the evidence inside
this building needed to be destroyed, so in 7 seconds it completely collapsed into
its own footprint. This major tactical error so embarrassed the 9-11 Commission
that they didn’t even address it in their ‘comprehensive’ report.
OSAMA BIN LADEN: DEAD OR ALIVE?
On May 5, 2010 Iranian Pres. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told ABC News anchor
George Stephanopoulos, “I heard that Osama bin Laden is in Washington, DC.
He’s there because he was a previous partner of Mr. Bush. They were colleagues
in the old days. They were in the oil business together.”
His statement piqued my interest, for 2 Icelandic filmmakers released a
documentary in Apr. 2010 entitled Feathered Cocaine that alleged bin Laden
resided in a luxurious Tehran penthouse since 2003.
These stories led me to ponder the status of everyone’s favorite bogeyman, an
enigmatic figure who can be anywhere, everywhere, or nowhere—
simultaneously—depending on the particular agenda at hand. What follows is a
timeline chronicling the perfect Orwellian enemy.
In Mar. 2000, Asia Week cited bin Laden’s kidney infection, a medical
problem that placed his life in serious danger.
France’s Le Figaro reported in July 2001 that Dr. Terry Calloway of the
American Hospital in Dubai performed surgery on bin Laden for a urinary
infection related to his kidney disease. He flew there from Quetta Airport in
Pakistan.
During this treatment, Richard Labeviere, Swiss investigative reporter and
author of The Corridors of Terror, claimed that Dubai CIA station chief Larry
Mitchell met bin Laden in the hospital. He then traveled back to CIA headquarters
in Langley on July 15.
Another bombshell arrived during a Jan. 28, 2002 broadcast of the CBS
Evening News with Dan Rather when correspondent Barry Petersen referenced bin
Laden’s admission to a Pakistani hospital in Rawalpindi on Sept. 10, 2001—one
day before 9-11. He added that Pakistan’s ISI informed the CIA of his kidney
dialysis treatment, whereas an onsite staff employee insisted, “I have seen many
pictures of the man. He is the man we know as Osama bin Laden.”
Following the Sept. 11 attacks, FBI files confirmed that from Sept. 14-20, the
bin Laden family chartered 6 different flights to scurry relatives and royal Saudi
members out of America. The U.S. government permitted and helped coordinate
these evacuations.
If bin Laden did lie in a Pakistani hospital on 9-11, it explains his Sept. 16
statement to Al Jazeera. “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears
to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation.” 12 days later,
he similarly told the Pakistani newspaper Ummat, “I am not involved in the Sept.
11 attacks in the U.S.” Bin Laden made 2 other denials as to his involvement.
Coincidentally, in July 2006 FBI officials admitted they “had no hard evidence
connecting bin Laden to 9-11.”
Capitalizing on the mainstream media’s mythmaking, Pres. George W. Bush
snarled on Sept. 17 that he wanted bin Laden “Dead or Alive.” However, on Mar.
13, 2002 he inexplicably flip-flopped. “I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no
idea and I don’t really care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.” Further
denigrating the memory of 9-11 victims, Bush referred to ‘Osama bin Forgotten’
again during a presidential debate on Oct. 14, 2004. “I just don’t spend that much
time on him.”
Did Bush’s dismissive attitude reflect Prof. David Ray Griffin’s thoroughly
researched conclusion in Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive that the purported alQaeda
leader actually died on Dec. 13, 2001 of kidney failure (or associated
complications) in Afghanistan’s Tora Bora mountains? He was buried 24 hours
later in an unmarked grave.
This date is vitally important, for Dec. 13 also marks the last time U.S.
intelligence sources monitored bin Laden’s voice transmissions from Tora Bora.
Up until then, he had been detected on a regular basis. Also, Dec. 13 marked the
first of bin Laden’s ‘confession’ tapes.
Interestingly, Prof. Bruce Lawrence (a bin Laden specialist), Prof. Angelo
Codevilla, David Ray Griffin, 9-11 researcher Vinnie Sammartino, Swiss
scientists at the Dalle Molle Institute, and Richard Mueller of Berkeley’s National
Laboratories all unequivocally refute the authenticity of subsequent bin Laden
audio and videotapes.
Verification of bin Laden’s death arrived in the Dec. 26, 2001 edition of
Egypt’s al-Wafd newspaper (Vol. 15, No. 4633). “A prominent official in the
Afghan Taliban movement announced the death of Osama bin Laden, stating that
he suffered serious complications in the lungs.” They also included his funeral
notice, along with references to family members and al Qaeda colleagues
attending this service.
Scores of other media sources and political leaders have confirmed bin Laden’s
demise.
• Fox News, Dec. 26, 2001: “Osama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to
an unrelated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported.”
• Pakistan Pres. Pervez Musharraf, Jan. 18, 2002: “I think now, finally, he is
dead for the reason he is a kidney patient.”
• CNN’s Peter Bergen, Feb. 1, 2002 (commenting on a Dec. 2001 videotape):
“He looks pretty terrible. He’s barely moving the left side of his body. He’s clearly
got diabetes. He has low blood pressure. He’s got a wound in his foot. He’s
apparently got dialysis for kidney problems. He has aged enormously.”
• FBI counterterrorism chief Dale Watson (July 18, 2002) and Afghan Pres.
Hamid Karzai (Nov. 6, 2002) both said bin Laden was “probably dead,” while the
World Tribune reported on Oct. 16, 2002, “Israeli sources said Israel and the
United States assess that bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in
Afghanistan in December.”
• Utilizing ludicrous doublespeak, Def. Sec. Donald Rumsfeld babbled on Oct.
7, 2002, “Osama bin Laden is either alive and well or alive and not too well, or not
alive.”
• During a Nov. 2, 2008 interview with famed UK personality David Frost,
Pakistani Prime Min. Benazir Bhutto matter-of-factly made reference to bin Laden
being assassinated by al-Qaeda double agent Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh.
• In Mar. 2009 Prof. Angelo M. Codevilla (a U.S. foreign intelligence officer)
quipped, “All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama
bin Laden.”
• Apr. 27, 2009 found Pakistani Pres. Asif Ali Zardari stating, “Osama bin
Laden is probably dead.”
• Prolific 9-11 author David Ray Griffin quoted former Nat. Sec. Council
member Oliver North in an Oct. 9, 2009 article. “I’m certain Osama is dead, and
so are all the guys I stay in touch with.”
• In the Dec. 8, 2009 edition of Time magazine, CIA agent Robert Baer quoted
a colleague who’s been hunting bin Laden for years. “He’s dead, of course. No
wonder there’s no intelligence on him.”
• Lastly, on Mar. 16, 2010 Atty. Gen. Eric Holder testified (with a wink and
nod) during Senate hearings. “The reality is that we will be reading Miranda rights
to the corpse of Osama bin Laden.”
Considering this preponderance of evidence, those who believe Osama bin
Laden is still alive and commandeering al-Qaeda probably also look to the sky
every Christmas Eve to see if Santa Claus is flying over their house in a sleigh.
Yet, some may wonder: why does our government keep perpetuating this
fiction? Mike Rudin of The Conspiracy Files provided the most succinct of
answers on Jan. 10, 2010. “U.S. intelligence services are manufacturing the bin
Laden statements to create an evil bogeyman to justify the so-called war on
terror.”
Addendum
In The New World Order Exposed, this writer dedicated an entire chapter to the
vast connections between the Bush crime family and bin Ladens. Although I won’t
reiterate the entire tale here, it should be known that on Sept. 10, 2001 ex-CIA Dir.
and former Pres. George Bush, Sr. met with one of Osama bin Laden’s brothers at
a Carlyle Group business conference in Washington, D.C.
• Ahmed Rashid, who has written extensively about the Taliban, claims that
U.S. military forces were in attendance with Osama bin Laden in a Rawalpindi,
Pakistan hospital on the evening of Sept. 10, 2001. A hospital employee confirms
this information. “The military had him surrounded.”
• Asia Times reported on July 13, 2002, “Exactly one year ago, from July 4 to
July 14, Osama bin Laden was undergoing medical treatment at the American
Hospital in Dubai. He arrived by plane from Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan
(daily flights either with PIA or Emirates Airlines). He met many wealthy Saudi
princes and businessmen and was also visited by the local CIA chief. He could
have been arrested on the spot—and there would be no excuses for a war against
terrorism. He was not arrested. The rest, of course, is history—with an al-Qaeda
hand in the screenplay.”
• Correspondent Barry Petersen to Dan Rather, anchor of the CBS Evening
News, during a Jan. 28, 2002 broadcast. “CBS News has been told that the night
before the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan. He was
getting medical treatment with the support of the very military that days later
pledged its backing for the U.S. war on terror in Afghanistan.”
Osama bin Laden ultimately made a statement on Sept. 28, 2001 to the
Karachi, Pakistan newspaper Ummat. “I was not involved in the September 11
attacks in the United States, nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists
a government within a government within the United States. That secret
government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. The American system
is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States.”
On June 5, 2006 the Muckraker Report contacted FBI headquarters to inquire
why Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted Poster did not include his alleged
involvement in the 9-11 attacks. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for
the FBI, responded, “The reason why 9-11 is not mentioned on Osama bin
Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting
bin Laden to 9-11.”
Ironically, al-Qaeda’s most recognized spokesman, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, is
actually a Jewish man born in Orange County, Calif. Given the birth name Adam
Pearlman, his grandfather was a “zealous supporter of Israel” and sat on the board
of directors for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALS
9-11 REMOTE CONTROL OVERRIDE SYSTEM
A whistleblower has confirmed that technology capable of remotely
controlling an aircraft from the ground, in addition to entirely locking out the
flight crew and autopilot systems, existed prior to the Sept. 11 attacks.
On May 17, 2010 Rob Balsamo, co-founder of Pilots for 9-11 Truth, broke the
story by interviewing avionics technician Wayne Anderson, formerly of Dalfort
Aviation in Texas. This writer subsequently interviewed both men on May 19 and
20. What emerged from these sessions adds even more validity to the probability
of 9-11 being an inside job.
During late 1996 into early 1997, Anderson participated in tests at Dallas’
Love Field where technicians embedded backdoor software into the avionics of
Boeing aircraft. Once installed, computer engineers on the ground had the ability
to override the pilot and control their autopilot systems, all from an external
location.
It’s been common knowledge for decades that unmanned airplanes could be
remotely flown. But now, Anderson has revealed that aircraft can be programmed
from the ground—via transponders—to such an extent that even when pilots
disconnected the autopilot system and circuit breakers, their aircraft could still be
controlled from a remote source. This development may explain why pilots
weren’t able to transmit emergency signals on 9-11. Those with access codes on
the ground had effectively locked them out by overriding their onboard systems.
Such a tactic may also explain why none of the pilots sent an urgent “I have
been hijacked” transponder code to air traffic controllers. In essence, their
transponder frequencies had already been piggy-backed by technicians that
rendered their onboard communications capabilities inoperable. Pilots didn’t warn
of midair hijackings on 9-11 because, instead, control of their planes had been
taken over by ground-based hijackers
Anderson also told Balsamo that during these tests, pilots were unable to
physically locate the remote guidance system or external power source anywhere
on their control panels. Therefore, after all autopilot functions were rendered
ineffective, the only way to regain control and override the backdoor software was
to completely power-down the aircraft. In mid-flight, such a tactic is obviously
dangerous.
Another disconcerting element to this scenario is: once a pilot’s electronics are
overridden, they’re no longer able to communicate with air traffic controllers
because their cockpit microphones, along with CVRs (Cockpit Voice Recorders)
have been bypassed by the remote control intruders. The same applies to their
emergency transponder frequencies, which are similarly neutralized.
Anderson, formerly employed by Braniff Airlines, told this writer on May 20,
2010, “The original premise for this technology was to foil a terrorist takeover.
But now, pilots are vulnerable to anyone who knows how to misuse this software.
That’s why my superiors clearly didn’t want this information leaking out. It’s not
any secret that industrial espionage takes place.”
When asked if ground controllers possessing the ability to irreversibly take
over an aircraft by locking out the pilots could have been responsible for the Sept.
11 attacks, Anderson replied, “With this software, they were capable of doing 9-
11.”
His response should make everyone reevaluate the particulars of that fateful
morning of Sept. 11, 2001. With supposedly hijacked airliners errantly flying all
across the eastern seaboard, we can now conclude that this false-flag terrorist
event was staged. Not only did the Air Force inexplicably stand-down for over an
hour, the Pentagon and White House also possessed the most advanced antiaircraft
capabilities imaginable, yet never used them. Plus, if this avionic backdoor
takeover technology existed at the time, technicians could have simply overridden
the ‘hijackers,’ retaken control, and safely grounded Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93.
That is, if what we witnessed on television was ‘real’ and not a murderous charade
orchestrated by techno-wizards lurking in the shadows.
Note 1: On Jan. 13, 2002 former German Def. Sec. Andreas Von Buelow
offered an alternative 9-11 theory to Tagesspiegel. “The steering of the planes was
perhaps taken out of the pilots hands from outside. The Americans had developed
a method in the 1970s whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening
into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system].”
Note 2: Takeover technology undoubtedly existed on 9-11, so it’s obviously a
ruse to imply that planes were flying all over the eastern seaboard—even into
Ohio and Kentucky—for extended periods of time. If 9-11 were a legitimately
occurring event rather than a false-flag, ground-based controllers would have
simply taken over each ‘hijacked’ aircraft and grounded them to avert any attacks
on the World Trade Center towers or Pentagon. As already detailed, one of Rabbi
Dov Zakheim’s firms specialized in remote control technology.
WERE NUKES USED ON 9-11?
Were the horrors of 9-11 even worse than anyone imagined? Could New York
City have actually been nuked on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001?
The possibility of such a scenario arose during this writer’s Aug. 23, 2010
interview with aerospace and chemical engineer T. Mark Hightower. As a member
and petition signer of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, Hightower has
studied the works of military explosives experts, investigators from Finland, the
UK and Russia, along with other physicists (both named and ‘anonymous’).
Not claiming to have all the definitive answers, Hightower also doesn’t fall
into the category of researchers who stake out unbending either/or claims and
refuse to budge. Rather, he remains open-minded to new developments and their
analysis. Utilizing this approach, he shared his best evidence for the use of
miniature nuclear devices inside the World Trade Center towers.
From Hightower’s perspective, nano-thermites and conventional explosives
could well have been used in conjunction with an even more lethal energy source
to produce not only a controlled demolition, but also a veritable China Syndrome
directly in the heart of lower Manhattan.
Similar to the Chernobyl meltdown, Hightower explained the phenomenon. “If
nukes were used to disintegrate the World Trade Center’s immense inner core,
only a small percentage actually reacted when these devices were detonated. The
leftover materials subsequently continued to react, and therefore kept producing
tremendous amounts of heat. This continual source of energy explains the molten
steel discovered beneath ground level weeks after 9-11.”
A point of contention arises over this concept. Nano-thermites may explain
how the towers were pulverized in mid-air and turned to dust prior to ever
impacting the ground. But the ‘vaporization’ (as opposed to mere ‘melting’) of
these massive metal columns required something on the level of a nuclear
reaction.
Skeptics question the very possibility of molten steel beneath each tower, yet
its existence has been confirmed by journalist William Langewiesche, WTC
structural designer Leslie Robertson, paramedic Lee Turner, construction company
president Steve Tully, in addition to firefighters, health advisers, Air National
Guard members, and sanitation workers who removed the debris.
Further evidence of energy sources magnitudes beyond typical cutting charges
can be found in reports from NASA and an article in GCN (Government
Computer News). In the weeks and months following 9-11, both described ‘hot
spots’ that exceeded 1300 degrees. Hightower commented on their findings.
“These heat signature images recorded from space couldn’t be produced by simple
detonations.”
Another anomaly involves the numerous automobiles near Ground Zero that
were roasted beyond recognition. Diane Sawyer of ABC News conducted an oncamera
interview with firemen who described cars and buses being “twisted and
melted into nothing.”
Although unable to arrive at irrefutable answers, Hightower weighs in on this
subject. “Some have speculated that an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) caused the
devastation to these vehicles. Whatever the case, the destruction resulted from
much more than a common office fire.” He added in regard to unproven energy
sources, “There are technologies in existence beyond anything the general public
knows about.”
One final suppressed news item must be considered. How can authorities
explain the proliferation of health-related respiratory diseases and deaths
surrounding first responders at Ground Zero? Sicknesses undoubtedly afflict those
at any toxic cleanup site. But the rapid onset of blood and organ cancers more
closely resembles those who were subjected to government radiation tests, or the
tragic survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Is there any correlation between these dying workers and the phenomenon of
instantaneous dust clouds and steel being reduced to a molten state?
Hightower provided a theory of what may have occurred that day. “Regular
detonators and nano-thermites were potentially used as incendiary devices to cut
through metal on the WTC’s exterior sections. But if mini-nukes were located at
the building’s core and shielded from view, no one would have seen their
extremely bright flashes and super-heated explosions. The release was so energetic
that it may have momentarily reached millions of degrees.”
Imagine, it took New York City’s finest a full 100 days to extinguish all the
fires at Ground Zero. A 50-ton press in the WTC’s basement wasn’t found
crushed, but instead completely melted.
Ground Zero chaplain Herb Trimpe may have provided the most riveting
firsthand account. “The fires burned up to 2000 degrees underground before they
actually got down to those areas and they cooled off. I talked to many contractors,
and they saw trapped molten metal. Beams had totally been melted because of the
heat.”
Were simple cutting charges used, or something far more ominous?
INITIAL FLIGHT 93 NEWS BROADCASTS
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 NBC and Fox News aired live feeds from
Shanksville, Pa. where Flight 93 purportedly crashed. Neither of these telecasts
was ever shown again to the American public. The reason is obvious.
During NBC’s initial report, a female newscaster broadcasting from a
helicopter stated that the debris field below covered a 3-to-4 mile radius. Such a
feat is physically impossible if a commercial airliner simply plummeted into the
ground.
She continued, “This is one of those cases where pictures really do tell a story.
The most horrifying aspect of this particular crash scene is how little debris is
visible. There is a large crater in the ground. [The cameraman focuses on a rather
small hole with absolutely nothing else in or around it.] But that’s really all you
see. Investigators out there have found nothing larger than a phone book.”
Incidentally, in Phantom Flight 93, the dimensions of a Boeing 757 are listed:
weight: 255,000 pounds; length: 150 feet; wingspan: 124 feet.
The second on-scene update came from a Fox News reporter who interviewed
Pittsburgh affiliate photographer Chris Chaniki.
Fox: “Chris, I’ve seen the pictures. It looks like there’s nothing there except for
a hole in the ground.”
Chaniki: “Basically, that’s right. The only thing you could see was a big gouge
in the earth and some broken trees.”
Fox: “Any large pieces of debris at all?”
Chaniki: “No, there was nothing you could distinguish that a plane had crashed
there.”
Fox: “Smoke … fires?”
Chaniki: “Nothing. It was absolutely quiet; nothing going on down there. No
smoke, no fire.”
Fox: “How big would you say that hole was?”
Chaniki: “From my estimate, I’d say it was probably 15-20 feet long and 10
feet wide.”’
Fox: “What else could you see on the ground?”
Chaniki: “You couldn’t see anything except dust and ash and people walking
around.”
The one thing nobody saw in the ground that day was a Boeing 757, because it
wasn’t there.
DID THE MAGIC OF TELEVISION
FOOL AMERICANS ON 9-11?
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 did Americans actually witness Flight 175
striking WTC 2, or were they fed an image that had been altered by sophisticated
TV fakery? For years a faction of the 9-11 truth movement called ‘no-planers’ has
been hotly debating this subject. Their claim that no planes crashed into the twin
towers has been a major distraction for legitimate researchers. They’ve also shifted
the focus of attention away from the strong possibility that the planes in question
weren’t commercial airliners, but instead military replacements.
One reason for this controversy stems from the camera angle shown by ABC
News. In their initial footage, the second plane (purportedly a Boeing 767) came
into view and then disappeared behind WTC 1, which almost entirely blocked the
south tower. As such, television audiences weren’t able to see the impending
collision, only a darkened plane that skipped across their screen before ‘exploding’
out of sight.
Beginning in 2003, no-planers claimed that the government used holograms
instead of commercial airliners. Presenting nothing more than fuzzy photographs
and blurry videos, they coined such non-scientific terms as ‘dust pimples,’
‘whatzit,’ ‘King Kong-sized holograms,’ ‘fire perps,’ ‘blurry blobs,’ ‘divebombing
thingies’ and ‘wing-flapping holoshadows’ to describe the alleged
images.
When their hologram theories became a laughingstock, this same crowd next
turned to a concept called TV Fakery to characterize ‘butter planes’ purportedly
flying into the twin towers.
To support their proposal, no-planers cited the work of professional freelance
photographer Evan Fairbanks of KSK Films. By happenstance on the morning of
9-11, he proceeded to videotape a plane plummeting into WTC 2. During
subsequent interviews, Fairbanks spoke of seeing this plane disappear into the
structure “as if a floor had been hollowed out and it was landing in a hangar.”
Admittedly, the aircraft seems to effortlessly glide into the tower as if it were
some type of Hollywood movie. However, after filming this incident, Fairbanks
conveniently surrendered his equipment to 2 FBI agents, who dubbed a copy of his
master tape.
Following the FBI’s entrance onto the scene, discrepancies plagued Fairbanks’
work. First, his footage didn’t include any audio because, according to him, he
accidentally turned-off the sound button. Curiously, a later version of this exact
same video offered dramatic crashing noises of the plane’s impact into WTC 2.
Needless to say, a contradiction exists.
‘Live’ Broadcasts?
Although skeptics lower the number of live-feed broadcasts on the morning of
9-11, in actuality various national and local stations carried the pivotal WTC 2
impact. Unfortunately, Flight 175 or a Boeing 767 is not identifiable in any of
these telecasts.
The most crucial data originated from WABC, recorded ‘live’ by cameraman
Johnny Del Giorno in News Chopper 7. Inexplicably, the helicopter’s pilot
positioned himself in a manner that allowed the north tower, emitting smoke after
being hit at 8:46 a.m. (17 minutes earlier) to almost entirely conceal WTC 2. Thus,
when a darkened aircraft entered their line of vision, it became concealed from
view behind WTC 1 before impacting the south tower.
Similarly, local affiliate WNYW Channel 5 broadcast a live feed, but their
camera angled allowed WTC 2 to block the point of actual impact. Therefore,
viewers gleaned a plane approaching the towers that momentarily slipped from
view. They next saw what appeared to be the aircraft’s nose emerging from the
opposite side of WTC 2 before their screens momentarily went black.
On other stations, particularly CBS, NBC, CNN and NY 1, no plane is
physically presented striking WTC 2 due to long shots or out-of-position camera
angles.
Considering the historic nature of these attacks, the cameramen in question
strangely failed to utilize close-up angles or extreme wide shots. Further, the livefeeds
from these various outlets switched from dark backgrounds to those being
quite bright, as if they were alternating from different news choppers. If a network
such as ABC was purportedly running continuous, unedited live footage from only
one source, why did their backgrounds, color, brightness and camera positions
keep changing?
This point is vital because filmmaker Rick Siegal identified at least 14 different
helicopters in the air over lower Manhattan at 9:00 a.m. on 9-11. Some were news
choppers, while others clearly originated from the U.S. military.
This situation begs the question: why were more than a dozen helicopters able
to circle the skies prior to WTC 2 being impacted, while not a single fighter jet
reached the scene? The reality of a deliberate military stand-down cannot be
denied, especially since they could have thwarted these kamikaze airliners.
Shadow Government
Were simulated landscapes of Manhattan superimposed onto ‘live’ newscast
footage prior to being broadcast? Or, were computer generated images (CGI)
utilized to mask or alter the color schemes and backdrops prior to being uploaded
for real time broadcast on television stations? Further, could image layering and
digital renderings uploaded to a black-ops command center be another element to
the already complicated 9-11 puzzle?
Consider that an in-air cameraman inadvertently caught on film the type of
equipment being used that day: a WESCAM MX-15. These devices are described
as being sophisticated high-tech military camera systems. The manufacturer, L-3
Communications, professes that they’re capable of performing “real time video
edit functions (i.e. live inserts of CGI)” and that “visual imaging can be integrated
with moving maps and communication encryption protocols.”
Moreover, the National Security Agency (NSA) contracted with an ultra-secret
company called SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) to develop
a program called “Trailblazer.” This system’s primary application revolved around
“the NSA’s ability to intercept cell phone calls, e-mails and other electronic
communications.”
In a seminal Mar. 2007 Vanity Fair article, Donald Barlett and James Steele
described SAIC as a “dark and ruthless corporation whose power extends into
every cranny around the globe, whose technological expertise is without peer,
whose secrets are unfathomable.”
Not coincidentally, one of their specialties is ‘information warfare’. In this
light, when a job gets too dirty or risky, the CIA, NSA and FBI turn to stealth
companies like SAIC, who is considered more powerful than all these other
agencies combined. SAIC is also an integral part of the government’s intelligence
gathering network.
Other connections are downright eerie. SAIC acted as one of the firms
responsible for security at the WTC complex prior to 9-11. Further, in 2001
SAIC’s chief operating officer was Duane Andrews, a former special assistant to
Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon.
Scientist and whistleblower Kevin Ryan noted in a Dec. 12, 2009 article
entitled Demolition Access to the WTC Towers that George W. Bush’s brother
Marvin worked for a defense contractor “that was 55 percent owned by SAIC.”
Marvin Bush also sat on the board of directors for Securacom, a company that
provided security for the WTC complex on 9-11.
Ryan and other researchers further discovered:
a) SAIC specialized in nano-thermite technology.
b) SAIC was one of the first companies to arrive at Ground Zero after the twin
towers collapsed.
c) Lt. Col. John Blitch opined, “SAIC had the means and opportunity to
neutralize any unwanted explosives that might have been buried in the pile at
Ground Zero.”
d) SAIC became a major contributor to NIST’s WTC cover-up report.
e) Falsely accused anthrax suspect Stephen Hatfill worked at SAIC with
staunch Zionist Jerome Hauer, who directed Rudy Giuliani’s emergency command
center in WTC 7 from 1996-2000.
f) Hauer hired former FBI agent John O’Neil to a security post at the WTC
complex. Known as “the man who knew too much” about Osama bin Laden,
O’Neil died on 9-11 during the WTC collapse—his first day on the job.
SAIC’s role is imperative in understanding the shadowy private contractors
who worked for NSA, led at the time of 9-11 by Michael Hayden. SAIC also
rebuilt the NSA/FBI surveillance systems that conveniently ‘failed’ in the months
preceding 9-11. Despite their supposed incompetence, NSA spooks were able to
determine the identity of each ‘passenger’ onboard the 4 doomed 9-11 flights far
quicker than the FBI or CIA.
As NSA Dir. from 1999-2005, Hayden later became CIA Dir. under George
W. Bush. During an Apr. 15, 2007 interview with C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb, Hayden
admitted, “The U.S. is run by intelligence agencies.” Still, after arranging
multimillion-dollar contracts with numerous high-tech companies like SAIC,
Hayden’s NSA still suffered a ‘stand-down’ on 9-11 that resembled the
Pentagon’s prolonged lack of response.
Video Manipulation
According to special effects technician Peter Velis, intelligence agencies had
specific goals on 9-11: usurp live digital transmissions generated by military
and/or news choppers, alter the data at a central computer Information Warfare
Center (IWC), and then regurgitate the data back into a ‘live’ network stream that
was subsequently broadcast to television audiences.
During a Sept. 10, 2010 interview with this writer, Velis began, “The ability to
alter live major network videos is the holy grail of criminal activity and military
deception. Since ABC was the only national network to broadcast a full view of
the south tower, those at IWC tried to prevent audiences from seeing that the
aircraft making impact with WTC 2 wasn’t a United Airlines plane, but instead a
remote-controlled military version 767. They wanted to insure that it wasn’t
visually identifiable so nobody could see any unaltered images before they were
doctored.”
Velis continued, “To takeover these live network transmissions, IWC
commanders first positioned helicopters in the sky following the WTC 1 strike
(which no viewers saw live). Black-op departments then intercepted these live
transmissions from specially equipped cameras and washed-out any identifying
marks which showed it wasn’t Flight 175. By slightly skipping the frames and
inserting synthetic color and darkened backdrops, any accurate detail and shape of
the plane was lost.”
He concluded, “This brief manual override by an external agency ultimately
altered the decision-making process of an entire populace.” Indeed, due to the
magic of television, Americans believed that 19 Muslim terrorists hijacked
commercial airliners and flew them into skyscrapers. Although still a conspiracy
theory, Velis’ claims are stunningly accurate because not one local or national
television station allowed viewers to positively identify the second plane striking
WTC 2.
INTERVIEW WITH FORMER CNN REPORTER
WHO WAS FIRST ON SCENE AT PENTAGON ON 9-11
There’s an old saying: Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining. Likewise,
don’t show me a photo taken only minutes after the Pentagon ‘event’ and insist
that a Boeing 757—which is 155 feet long with a 124-foot wingspan and weighs
100 tons—crashed into our nation’s military nerve center.
During an Oct. 19, 2010 interview, this writer questioned former CNN
correspondent Jamie McIntyre about the 200,000 pounds of missing wreckage.
McIntyre explained, “What was left of the plane broke into thousands of tiny
pieces. Most of it was destroyed.”
However, McIntyre’s own words delivered during a live CNN broadcast on the
morning of Sept. 11, 2001 seem to betray this sentiment. “From my close-up
inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
Pentagon.”
He continued, “There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage,
nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane
crashed into the side of the Pentagon.”
Later, as possible ‘damage control’, McIntyre objected that his comments were
taken out of context.
But were they? Pentagon officials initially excused the lack of physical
wreckage by saying the plane, including its black boxes and flight data recorders,
vaporized. Yet, deceased employees and passengers were identified by DNA,
fingerprints and drivers licenses. How could high-grade steel completely
disintegrate, while flesh and plastic documents remained intact?
McIntyre responded, “It’s inexplicable how some stuff survives. It’s a fluky
situation what makes it through and what doesn’t. It’s not inconsistent for some
fragile things to survive while other strong things don’t.”
In other words, we’re supposed to believe this preposterous spin instead of our
own eyes. Also, why is only one 18-foot hole visible on the Pentagon’s exterior
ring? Government spokesmen said it was created by Flight 77’s fuselage, yet a
Boeing’s nose is described by aviation experts as a weak eggshell, a sausage skin,
or an empty beer can. Airplane mechanics cast serious doubt on whether a
fuselage could penetrate 3 immensely strong reinforced concrete walls.
McIntyre admitted that never once did he interview any structural engineers to
determine why the plane’s 5-ton engines didn’t create any holes.
In fact, McIntyre never interviewed a single pilot to determine if Hani
Hanjour—who could barely drive an automobile and was refused permission to
rent a Cessna prop plane months before 9-11—could have commandeered this
aircraft. He called the matter “immaterial.”
Moreover, McIntyre failed to interview any air traffic controllers to ascertain
whether a Boeing 757 could execute a 7,000-foot drop in 2.5 minutes while
pulling a sharp 270-degree turn. Nor did he interview a single airline technician to
verify if this lumbering aircraft could perform such Top Gun maneuvers. Neither
did he contact a single physician in regard to whether Hanjour would have lost
consciousness in-flight due to the excessive G-forces.
McIntyre also neglected to interview any photographic experts or search-andrescue
workers in regard to why no wreckage appeared in the initial photos.
Additionally, Prof. A.K. Dewdney of Western Ontario Univ. conducted
numerous experiments that determined passengers could not have made cell phone
calls that morning. Such technology only became available in 2004. Pilot Russ
Wittenberg confirmed that these devices couldn’t lock onto cell phone towers
from the heights or speeds attributed by the government.
Inexplicably, McIntyre didn’t contact a single electronics expert to verify the
authenticity of these calls.
When asked if he viewed any of the 84 confiscated videotapes that the
Pentagon has refused to release under FOIA requests, McIntyre responded in the
negative. AFP followed-up, “Has there ever been any conclusive video footage
where Flight 77 is unmistakably seen striking the Pentagon?”
McIntyre replied, “As far as we know, there is no video footage comparable to
WTC 2 being struck in New York.”
Considering the Pentagon’s enormous surveillance systems, the government
can’t produce even one identifiable photograph of Flight 77 crashing into this
facility. Moreover, McIntyre didn’t witness the crash, and only arrived on scene
45 minutes later. Worse, he confessed to not doing any research into other
alternate explanations, while adding, “I’m not aware of anyone at CNN exploring
these subjects in any detail.”
By his own admission, McIntyre couldn’t provide evidence of interviewing a
single individual whose perspective differed from the government’s ‘official
version’.
He justified this lack of intellectual and journalistic curiosity with the
following mantras: (a) All evidence points in only one direction, (b) There are no
plausible alternatives, (c) These aren’t relevant lines of questioning, and (d) All
this might make sense if we didn’t know whether American Airlines Flight 77 hit
the Pentagon. But we do know that for a fact, so all this other debate is irrelevant.
Unfortunately, McIntyre still don’t realize that this type of elitist arrogance is
why Americans don’t trust the corporate media. Conversely, he did acknowledge,
“It’s good to keep an open and skeptical mind because the government doesn’t
always tell the truth.” But by neglecting to investigate a single aspect of this story
that contradicts the government’s version, CNN, McIntyre, and his mainstream
media colleagues epitomize lapdog journalism at its shoddiest.
Note: On Oct. 14, 2010 this writer attended an “Influence and Fighting
Propaganda Conference” held at Turning Stone Resort in Verona, NY where, at a
Q&A session, McIntyre admitted that on 5 or 6 different occasions, the Pentagon
asked his network not to report on sensitive stories that could jeopardize national
security. In all cases, CNN acquiesced and withheld, at least temporarily, the
information. At a conference specifically devoted to the subject of propaganda,
could 9-11 have been one of those instances where Pentagon officials used the
pretense of ‘national security’ to put pressure on CNN?
FIREMEN AUDIOTAPES CAST MORE DOUBT
ON ‘OFFICIAL’ 9-11 STORY
A raging inferno blazing with such intensity that it caused the World Trade
Center towers’ steel girders to melt and ultimately collapse. This ‘official’
government story, despite tremendous amounts of propaganda, hasn’t withstood
scientific scrutiny, nor does video evidence support such a convoluted thesis.
Now, Maj. Reginald Shinn and his son Richard have released a short
documentary entitled Let Me Know When You See Fire that examines the final 10
minutes of fireman radio dispatches on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
During a Jan. 27, 2011 interview, Maj. Shinn told this writer, “We know from
hearing these tapes that firemen had reached the 79th floor. There was nothing
hysterical in their voices as the firemen talked back and forth among each other.”
Again, the public has been led to believe that WTC 2 was engulfed in flames
that reached thousands of degrees within the minutes prior to its collapse. But at
one point, Joseph Leavey of NYFD Battalion 15 is heard on the audiotape asking,
“Let me know when you see fire.”
On another transmission, only 7 minutes before the south tower fell, Dep.
Chief Orio Palmer is heard telling his colleagues that he had just reached the 78th
floor. He then states, “We’ve got 2 isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to
knock it down with 2 lines.” Palmer was directly on the scene, and he spoke these
words matter-of-factly, without any impending sense that catastrophe waited only
moments away.
Richard Shinn, producer of this film, commented to AFP, “After hearing these
tapes, it’s clear that conditions inside the south tower were relatively normal. They
were routinely doing what they were supposed to do,” Shinn explained.
To augment this sentiment, he continued. “These firemen were professionals.
Many had been in emergency situations for most of their lives. So, why would
they setup command posts in the lobbies of WTC 1 and 2 if they thought there was
any possibility of danger, or that the towers would come crashing down?” Shinn
asked.
Undoubtedly, the most startling aspect of this film involves the audiotape’s
abrupt ending just 2 minutes prior to the collapse of WTC 2. Richard Shinn
described how New York Port Authority officials redacted the final 2 minutes, and
wouldn’t release its contents even when faced with a FOIA ruling.
An obvious question is: what is contained in these final seconds of audiotape
that the public isn’t allowed to hear? On one hand, this decision may have been
made on humane grounds to prevent any further morbidity tainting an already
horrifying situation.
Or, did the firemen react to massive internal explosions that ultimately felled
the 110-story towers? Obviously, these rescue workers—calm and business-like
up until that point—would have voiced their terror and alarm as the tremendous
amount of energy required to topple these massive structures exploded and echoed
around them.
If the public ever heard their frantic words or descriptions, the government’s
ludicrous cover story of fire melting the internal steel columns would immediately
be exposed as a lie.
CHARLIE SHEEN: PROMINENT ACTOR GIVES
9-11 TRUTHERS A BAD NAME
One of the tactics commonly used to discredit 9-11 truthers is the canard that
they’re ‘anti-Semitic.’ Unfortunately, this rationale is even used among those
within the movement itself. This approach borders on being elitist as they say,
“People can’t handle this information. It’s too controversial.”
For a group that rails against mainstream media suppression, they engage in
the same exact form of censorship. But Israel’s central role in 9-11 must be
addressed because how can the truth hurt a truth movement?
Or, even worse, some members of the alternate press have blatantly formed a
none-too-subtle Israeli protection racket where they’ll blame 9-11 on the
Illuminati, Bush-Cheney, globalists, or the CIA—but never the Mossad or figures
within the Israeli government.
In essence, these factions of the 9-11 truth movement have no compunction
whatsoever of blaming their own government for the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, but they adamantly refuse to point a finger of blame at a foreign entity,
namely Israel. Why would they willingly want to protect these criminal elements?
Charlie Sheen—a 9-11 truther—entered the fray during a Feb. 24, 2011 radio
interview where he mockingly referred to the producer of his hit TV show, Chuck
Lorre, by his Hebrew name, Chaim Levine.
This move caused the Jewish Chronicle to call Sheen’s rants “borderline antiSemitic.”
Naturally, walking in lockstep with this publication, big name radio talk
show hosts began linking Sheen to ‘tinfoil hat wearers’ of the 9-11 truth
movement, as well as ‘anti-Semites’ who believe Israel was responsible for the
Sept. 11 attacks.
Considering Sheen’s recent spate of wildly erratic behavior where he referred
to himself and radio talk show host Alex Jones as “Vatican assassin warlocks,”
genuine researchers—including those at AFP—who’ve proven Israel’s role in 9-
11 are now being smeared by the lunacy of a Hollywood actor whose high-profile
meltdown is harming everyone associated with him

Advertisements

About Mac★Aethyr²³

MC, Wordsmyth, Psychonaut, MAC. Gunslinger.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: